62 research outputs found

    Prevalence and mechanisms of resistance to carbapenems in Enterobacteriaceae

    Full text link
    Objectives: To determine the point prevalence of carbapenem-non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae (CNSE) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) isolates among hospitalized patients in Belgium. Methods: Twenty-four hospital-based laboratories prospectively collected 200 non-duplicated Enterobacteriaceae isolates from clinical specimens of hospitalized patients over a 2 month period. All isolates were screened locally for decreased susceptibility to carbapenem drugs using a disc diffusion method according to CLSI interpretative criteria. CNSE strains were referred centrally for confirmation of carbapenemase by phenotypic and molecular testing. Results: From February to April 2012, 158 of the 4564 screened Enterobacteriaceae isolates were categorized as non-susceptible to carbapenems, resulting in a point prevalence of CNSE of 3.5% (95% CI: 2.9%–4.2%; range per centre: 0.5%–8.5%). Of the 125 referred CNSE isolates, 11 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates [OXA-48 (n=7), KPC type (n=3) and NDM type (n=1)], 1 OXA-48-positive Escherichia coli isolate and 1 KPC-positive Klebsiella oxytoca isolate were detected in eight hospitals. None of the 72 carbapenem-non-susceptible Enterobacter spp. isolates were confirmed as CPE. The minimal estimated point prevalence of CPE isolates was 0.28% (13/ 4564; 95% CI: 0.13%–0.44%) overall (range per centre: 0%–1.5%). Conclusions: Despite the overall low prevalence of CNSE found in this study, the detection of CPE isolates in one-third of the participating centres raises concerns and highly suggests the spread and establishment of CPE in Belgian hospitals

    Comparison of an in-house method and the commercial Sepsityperâ„¢ kit for bacterial identification directly from positive blood culture broths by matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

    No full text
    The identification of bacteria directly from positive blood cultures using matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a new challenge to microbiologists. However, the protocols previously described are often difficult to implement in routine and comparisons are not always possible due to the variability of interpretative criteria. This study evaluated the analytical and practical performances of an in-house (IH) method, adapted from previous protocols, and the Sepsityperâ„¢ kit (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Positive blood cultures from 63 different patients were prospectively evaluated by both methods. To enhance the sensitivity of these methods, lowered cut-offs were assessed and validated on 66 additional samples. The IH method produced 86.4% and 73.7% correct genus and species identifications, respectively, when using the lowered cut-offs of 1.4 and 1.6 for correct genus and species identifications. The Sepsityperâ„¢ kit showed similar results (78.0% and 68.4% correct genus and species identification, respectively). However, the IH method is ten-fold less expensive than the commercial option (0.72 vs. 7.45 /analysis) and its turnaround time is approximately 20 min versus the nearly 40 min required for the Sepsityperâ„¢ kit, which includes an extraction step. Finally, the IH method was introduced twice-daily in our routine practice.Comparative StudyEvaluation StudiesJournal ArticleSCOPUS: re.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Fast and Reliable Bacterial Identification by MALDI-TOF MS Directly from Positive Blood

    No full text
    (Abstract D-1292) p. 176info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublishe

    Arcobacter Species: An Unusual Intestinal Pathogen

    No full text
    [Abstract P 36.006]info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublishe
    • …
    corecore