57 research outputs found

    Doublet-Triplet Fermionic Dark Matter

    Full text link
    We extend the Standard Model (SM) by adding a pair of fermionic SU(2)-doublets with opposite hypercharge and a fermionic SU(2)-triplet with zero hypercharge. We impose a discrete Z_2-symmetry that distinguishes the SM fermions from the new ones. Then, gauge invariance allows for two renormalizable Yukawa couplings between the new fermions and the SM Higgs field, as well as for direct masses for the doublet (M_D) and the triplet (M_T). After electroweak symmetry breaking, this model contains, in addition to SM particles, two charged Dirac fermions and a set of three neutral Majorana fermions, the lightest of which contributes to Dark Matter (DM). We consider a case where the lightest neutral fermion is an equal admixture of the two doublets with mass M_D close to the Z-boson mass. This state remains stable under radiative corrections thanks to a custodial SU(2)-symmetry and is consistent with the experimental data from oblique electroweak corrections. Moreover, the amplitudes relevant to spin-dependent or independent nucleus-DM particle scattering cross section both vanish at tree level. They arise at one loop at a level that may be observed in near future DM direct detection experiments. For Yukawa couplings comparable to the top-quark, the DM particle relic abundance is consistent with observation, not relying on co-annihilation or resonant effects and has a mass at the electroweak scale. Furthermore, the heavier fermions decay to the DM particle and to electroweak gauge bosons making this model easily testable at the LHC. In the regime of interest, the charged fermions suppress the Higgs decays to diphoton by 45-75 % relative to SM prediction.Comment: 40 pages, v2: discussion and references on dark matter direct detection expanded, matches published version, v3: formulae in Appendix A correcte

    Anatomy of the Higgs boson decay into two photons in the unitary gauge

    Get PDF
    In this work, we review and clarify computational issues about the W-gauge boson one-loop contribution to the H -> gamma gamma decay amplitude, in the unitary gauge and in the Standard Model. We find that highly divergent integrals depend upon the choice of shifting momenta with arbitrary vectors. One particular combination of these arbitrary vectors reduces the superficial divergency down to a logarithmic one. The remaining ambiguity is then fixed by exploiting gauge invariance and the Goldstone Boson Equivalence Theorem. Our method is strictly realised in four-dimensions. The result for the amplitude agrees with the "famous" one obtained using dimensional regularisation (DR) in the limit d-> 4, where d is the number of spatial dimensions in Euclidean space. At the exact equality d=4, a three-sphere surface term appears that renders the Ward Identities and the equivalence theorem inconsistent. We also examined a recently proposed four-dimensional regularisation scheme and found agreement with the DR outcome.Comment: 1+20 pages, 2 figures, v2 few references added, Appendix A expanded, v3 matches published versio

    Radiative Light Dark Matter

    Full text link
    We present a Peccei-Quinn (PQ)-symmetric two-Higgs doublet model that naturally predicts a fermionic singlet dark matter in the mass range 10 keV-1 GeV. The origin of the smallness of the mass of this light singlet fermion arises predominantly at the one-loop level, upon soft or spontaneous breakdown of the PQ symmetry via a complex scalar field in a fashion similar to the so-called Dine-Fischler-Sredniki-Zhitnitsky axion model. The mass generation of this fermionic Radiative Light Dark Matter (RLDM) requires the existence of two heavy vector-like SU(2) isodoublets, which are not charged under the PQ symmetry. We show how the RLDM can be produced via the freeze-in mechanism, thus accounting for the missing matter in the Universe. Finally, we briefly discuss possible theoretical and phenomenological implications of the RLDM model for the strong CP problem and the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC).Comment: 17 pages, v2: typos corrected, matches published versio

    The Higgs Penguin and its Applications : An overview

    Full text link
    We review the effective Lagrangian of the Higgs penguin in the Standard Model and its minimal supersymmetric extension (MSSM). As a master application of the Higgs penguin, we discuss in some detail the B-meson decays into a lepton-antilepton pair. Furthermore, we explain how this can probe the Higgs sector of the MSSM provided that some of these decays are seen at Tevatron Run II and B-factories. Finally, we present a complete list of observables where the Higgs penguin could be strongly involved.Comment: 22 pages, 6 figures, Invited review article to appear in Mod. Phys. Lett. A, v2: Table 1 updated, comments and references adde

    Complete One-Loop MSSM Predictions for B --> lepton lepton' at the Tevatron and LHC

    Full text link
    During the last few years the Tevatron has dramatically improved the bounds on rare B-meson decays into two leptons. In the case of B_s --> mu+ mu-, the current bound is only ten times greater than the Standard Model expectation. Sensitivity to this decay is one of the benchmark goals for LHCb performance and physics. The Higgs penguin dominates this rate in the region of large tan(beta) of the MSSM. This is not necessarily the case in the region of low tan(beta), since box and Z-penguin diagrams may contribute at a comparable rate. In this article, we compute the complete one-loop MSSM contribution to B --> l+l'- for l,l' = e, mu. We study the predictions for general values of tan(beta) with arbitrary flavour mixing parameters. We discuss the possibility of both enhancing and suppressing the branching ratios relative to their Standard Model expectations. In particular, we find that there are "cancellation regions" in parameter space where the branching ratio is suppressed well below the Standard Model expectation, making it effectively invisible to the LHC.Comment: 30 pages, 4 figures; v.3: corrected factors of (2 pi) in (2.11), (3.1), (A.11), (A.13-14
    corecore