FDG-PET/CT imaging for staging and radiotherapy treatment planning of head and neck carcinoma

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Positron emission tomography (PET) has a potential improvement for staging and radiation treatment planning of various tumor sites. We analyzed the use of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/computed tomography (CT) images for staging and target volume delineation of patients with head and neck carcinoma candidates for radiotherapy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Twenty-two patients candidates for primary radiotherapy, who did not receive any curative surgery, underwent both CT and PET/CT simulation. Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) was contoured on CT (CT-GTV), PET (PET-GTV), and PET/CT images (PET/CT-GTV). The resulting volumes were analyzed and compared.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Based on PET/CT, changes in TNM categories and clinical stage occurred in 5/22 cases (22%). The difference between CT-GTV and PET-GTV was not statistically significant (p = 0.2) whereas the difference between the composite volume (PET/CT-GTV) and CT-GTV was statistically significant (p < 0.0001).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>PET/CT fusion images could have a potential impact on both tumor staging and treatment planning.</p

Hypofractionated radiotherapy after conservative surgery for breast cancer: analysis of acute and late toxicity

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A variety of hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules has been proposed after breast conserving surgery in the attempt to shorten the overall treatment time. The aim of the present study is to assess acute and late toxicity of using daily fractionation of 2.25 Gy to a total dose of 45 Gy to the whole breast in a mono-institutional series.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Eighty-five women with early breast cancer were assigned to receive 45 Gy followed by a boost to the tumour bed. Early and late toxicity were scored according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. For comparison, a group of 70 patients with similar characteristics and treated with conventional fractionation of 2 Gy to a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions followed by a boost, was retrospectively selected.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Overall median treatment duration was 29 days for hypofractionated radiotherapy and 37 days for conventional radiotherapy. Early reactions were observed in 72/85 (85%) patients treated with hypofractionation and in 67/70 (96%) patients treated with conventional fractionation (p = 0.01). Late toxicity was observed in 8 patients (10%) in the hypofractionation group and in 10 patients (15%) in the conventional fractionation group, respectively (p = 0.4).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The hypofractionated schedule delivering 45 Gy in 20 fractions shortened the overall treatment time by 1 week with a reduction of skin acute toxicity and no increase of late effects compared to the conventional fractionation. Our results support the implementation of hypofractionated schedules in clinical practice.</p

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer

Background: The present study assessed clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic prostate cancer patients. Materials and methods: Between 2017 and 2020, 37 lesions (12 osseous and 25 nodal targets) detected with conventional and/or functional imaging, were treated in 29 patients (pts), in different clinical settings: de novo oligometastatic (2 pts), oligorecurrent castration-sensitive (19 pts), castration-resistant (6 pts) prostate cancers and oligoprogressive disease during systemic therapy (2 pts). SBRT was delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy up to a total dose of 21 Gy given in 3 fractions for bone and 30 Gy in 5 fractions for nodal metastases. A total of 34% of pts received hormonal therapy. We evaluated biochemical control [prostate serum antigen (PSA) increase grade 2 was reported. Conclusions: SBRT for oligometastatic prostate cancer offers a good biochemical/local control and tangible delay of hormone/systemic therapy without major toxicities

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer

Background: The present study assessed clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic prostate cancer patients. Materials and methods: Between 2017 and 2020, 37 lesions (12 osseous and 25 nodal targets) detected with conventional and/or functional imaging, were treated in 29 patients (pts), in different clinical settings: de novo oligometastatic (2 pts), oligorecurrent castration-sensitive (19 pts), castration-resistant (6 pts) prostate cancers and oligoprogressive disease during systemic therapy (2 pts). SBRT was delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy up to a total dose of 21 Gy given in 3 fractions for bone and 30 Gy in 5 fractions for nodal metastases. A total of 34% of pts received hormonal therapy. We evaluated biochemical control [prostate serum antigen (PSA) increase &lt; 10%)], progression free-survival (PFS) (time from SBRT to biochemical progression), local control (LC) (time from SBRT to in-field radiologic progression), hormone/systemic therapy-free survival, acute and late toxicities. Results: At 3 months, biochemical response was observed in 20/29 pts (69%). At a median follow-up of 17 months (range 6-33), 8/20 (40%) of the 3-month responders remained free from progression. Two-year PFS and LC were 37% and 70%, respectively. In-field progression occurred in 3/37 (8%) lesions. Hormone/systemic therapy was delayed by an average of 11.6 months (range 3–28). No significant difference in PFS based on the type of lesion or concomitant endocrine therapy was observed and no toxicity &gt; grade 2 was reported. Conclusions: SBRT for oligometastatic prostate cancer offers a good biochemical/local control and tangible delay of hormone/systemic therapy without major toxicities

Reproducibility of patient setup by surface image registration system in conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The reproducibility of patient setup for radiotherapy is based on various methods including external markers, X-rays with planar or computerized image acquisition, and, more recently, surface matching imaging. We analyzed the setup reproducibility of 16 patients affected by prostate cancer who underwent conformal radiotherapy with curative intent by using a surface image registration system.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We analyzed the setup reproducibility of 16 patients affected by prostate cancer candidates for conformal radiotherapy by using a surface image registration system. At the initial setup, EPID images were compared with DRRs and a reference 3D surface image was obtained by the AlignRT system (Vision RT, London, UK). Surface images were acquired prior to every subsequent setup procedure. EPID acquisition was repeated when errors > 5 mm were reported.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The mean random and systematic errors were 1.2 ± 2.3 mm and 0.3 ± 3.0 mm along the X axis, 0.0 ± 1.4 mm and 0.5 ± 2.0 mm along the Y axis, and 2.0 ± 1.8 mm and -0.7 ± 2.4 mm along the Z axis respectively. The positioning error detected by AlignRT along the 3 axes X, Y, and Z exceeded the value of 5 mm in 14.1%, 2.0%, and 5.1% measurements and the value of 3 mm in 36.9%, 13.6% and 27.8% measurements, respectively. Correlation factors calculated by linear regression between the errors measured by AlignRT and EPID ranged from 0.77 to 0.92 with a mean of 0.85 and SD of 0.13. The setup measurements by surface imaging are highly reproducible and correlate with the setup errors detected by EPID.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Surface image registration system appears to be a simple, fast, non-invasive, and reproducible method to analyze the set-up alignment in 3DCRT of prostate cancer patients.</p

IROCA-TES: Improving Quality in Radiation Oncology through Clinical Audits — Training and Education for Standardization

Background: Clinical audits are an important tool to objectively assess clinical protocols, procedures, and processes and to detect deviations from good clinical practice. The main aim of this project is to determine adherence to a core set of consensus-based quality indicators and then to compare the institutions in order to identify best practices. Materials and methods: We conduct a multicentre, international clinical audit of six comprehensive cancer centres in Poland, Spain, Italy, Portugal, France, and Romania as a part of the project, known as IROCATES (Improving Quality in Radiation Oncology through Clinical Audits — Training and Education for Standardization). Results: Radiotherapy practice varies from country to country, in part due to historical, economic, linguistic, and cultural differences. The institutions developed their own processes to suit their existing clinical practice. Conclusions: We believe that this study will contribute to establishing the value of routinely performing multi-institutional clinical audits and will lead to improvement of radiotherapy practice at the participating centres

Urinary toxicity in patients treated with radical EBRT for prostate cancer: Analysis of predictive factors in an historical series

Aim and background &gt; The present study aims to identify predictive factors for urinary toxicity and self-reported symptoms after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer.Methods &gt; Two-hundred and eighty patients treated with EBRT for prostate cancer were included in the present study. Toxicity was scored following the grading system based on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) and Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) were used to analyse self-reported symptoms. Acute and late urinary toxicities were correlated to clinical and treatment parameters, radiation dosimetry data, IPSS and ICIQ-SF.Results &gt; Median patient age was 74 years (range, 64-83). Thirty-one percent experienced acute G1 urinary toxicity, 24% G2 and 3% G3. Fourteen percent experienced G1 late urinary toxicity and 3% G2. Bladder volume &lt; 200 cc was associated with acute urinary toxicity (P = 0.014); use of MRI for treatment planning allowed a lower incidence of late toxicity (P = 0.062) and use of IMRT allowed for reduced incidence in late toxicity (P = 0.038). Maximum bladder dose correlated with late urinary toxicity (P = 0.014). The analysis of self-reported symptoms showed a significant correlation between IPSS baseline values (P = 0.009), presence of nocturia (P = 0.002), bladder urgency (P = 0.024) and incontinence (P = 0.024) and development of acute urinary toxicity at univariate analysis. At multivariate logistic regression analysis, bladder filling, IPSS value, nocturia, and urinary incontinence retained significant correlation with acute toxicity (P = 0.0003).Discussion &gt; Significant independent predictors for acute urinary toxicity grade &gt;= 2 were bladder filling, IPSS value, nocturia, and urinary incontinence at baseline assessment

Three-dimensional surface imaging for detection of intra-fraction setup variations during radiotherapy of pelvic tumors

PURPOSE: Surface-based image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) allows positioning and/or monitoring patients in 3 dimensions (3D), without the use of ionizing radiation. In this study, we report on intra-fraction motion measured by acquisition of multiple images of 3D body surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients treated for pelvic tumors were enrolled. Setup variations (SV) through three consecutive body surfaces acquired by the optical IGRT system Align-RT (Vision-RT, London, UK) were analyzed before, during and at the end of treatment delivery. Displacements along the main axes (X, Y and Z) from initial (I) to mid-treatment (MT) and final (F) acquisitions were recorded. Time and direction of SV were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 6272 images from 792 fractions of 29 patients were available. The main source of misalignment was between I and MT acquisition (p < 0.001). The dominant SV direction was the vertical one (Z axis), with mean SV of -1.20 ± 0.06 mm and -1.55 ± 0.06 mm for I-MT and I-F acquisitions, respectively. The Y mean components of SV were, respectively, -0.95 ± 0.10 mm and -1.0 ± 0.10 for I-MT and I-F acquisitions, while the X deviations were 0.07 ± 0.08 mm for I-MT and 0.26 ± 0.08 mm I-F. CONCLUSION: Three-D surface imaging for patient setup monitoring highlighted remarkable mobility of patients during RT session, especially in the anterior-posterior direction (Z axis). The largest magnitude in patient movements occurred during the first part of delivery. These findings suggest that the initial setup control cannot not to be sufficient to guarantee treatment reproducibility, especially for long-lasting RT treatments