Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus in Adult Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) consist of a diverse family of tumors which are derived from the neuroendocrine system. Most NETs are well or moderately differentiated tumors with a relatively indolent growth pattern. However, these tumors can cause significant clinical disease due to release of functional products that mediate the carcinoid syndrome and other diverse sequela. They also can grow progressively and cause symptoms from local invasion or distant metastasis. NETs are optimally treated with surgery and somatosatin analogs (SSA’s) to control symptoms but are relatively insensitive to systemic chemotherapy. As a result, patients with advanced unresectable NETs have a poor prognosis. In 2011, two targeted therapies, sunitinib and everolimus were approved in the subset of progressive pancreatic NETs (pNETs). Everolimus is an oral inhibitor of the growth stimulatory mTOR pathway. In Phase 2 trials in NETs and pNETs, everolimus was well tolerated and associated with some response and widespread disease stabilization. In follow-up, randomized Phase 3 trials, everolimus was compared to placebo. In the RADIANT-2 trial, everolimus and a somatostatin analog were used in patients with functional NETs and treatment was associated with an an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS). In the RADIANT-3 trial, patients with pNET were randomized to receive everolimus or placebo along with best supportive care. Everolimus was again associated with improvement in PFS compared to placebo and it has been approved by the FDA for patients with progressive pNET. Everolimus is associated with frequent low grade toxicity but is also notable for increased rates of infection as well as non-infectious pneumonitis. mTOR inhibition with everolimus represents a significant advance in the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors

Effect of microwave oven heating times on androgen receptor antigen retrieval from paraffin-embedded prostatic adenocarcinoma

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of microwave oven heating for antigen retrieval on the immunoreactivity of human prostate carcinoma androgen receptor (AR) in tissue sections. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were microwaved at 5-min intervals for a total of 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 minutes at maximum power (700W). The monoclonal antibody F39.4.1 directed against human AR was used at a 1:10 dilution. Without microwave oven heating, prostatic tissue did not exhibit any AR immunoreactivity. Moderate positivity appeared after three 5-minute cycles of microwave heating. The intensity of immunoreactivity improved progressively with heating times of 20 and 25 min up to an optimum time of 30 minutes, when nuclear staining was most intense with the absence of background staining and without loss of morphological details. While antigen retrieval is effective in restoring antigenicity in a variety of setting, the length of time prostate tissue is exposed to microwave radiation is critical in order to obtain optimal AR immunostaining. AR immunostaining reliably permitted evaluation of the distribution and intensity of positively stained nuclei and the distinction of the various cell types in archival material

Pathology of pheochromocytoma and extra-adrenal paraganglioma

The 2004 WHO classification of endocrine tumors defines pheochromocytoma as a tumor arising from chromaffin cells in the adrenal medulla. Closely related tumors in extra-adrenal sympathetic and parasympathetic paraganglia are classified as extra-adrenal paragangliomas. A pheochromocytoma is an intra-adrenal sympathetic paraganglioma. While arbitrary, this nomenclature serves to emphasize important distinctive properties of intra-adrenal tumors that must be taken into account in clinical practice and research. Those include an often adrenergic phenotype, a relatively low rate of malignancy, and a predilection to occur in particular hereditary syndromes. Current roles of pathology are limited to distinguishing primary or metastatic pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas from other endocrine or nonendocrine tumors, and flagging tumors that show features suggestive of malignant potential or syndromic disease. Future roles may involve more definitive assessment of malignancy, genotype–phenotype correlation, and identification of targets for therapy. Pathology practice currently rests mostly on interpretation of conventional histological sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin, with variable ancillary application of immunohistochemical staining. Malignancy is currently defined by the presence of metastases, not local invasion. Local invasion alone is a poor predictor of metastases, and the absence of apparent invasion does not preclude development of metastases. The two types of aggressive behavior might therefore have different biological underpinnings, and those will be resolved most effectively if consistent terminology is employed. In order to be optimally informative, pathology reports must employ consistent nomenclature and incorporate standard elements. Templates or checklists for minimal standard reporting are recommended by several pathology associations, but identification of some recommended and optional elements is currently subjective or inconsistent