Ring-Exchange Interaction Effects on Magnons in Dirac Magnet CoTiO3_3

In magnetically ordered materials with localized electrons, the fundamental magnetic interactions are due to exchange of electrons [1-3]. Typically, only the interaction between pairs of electrons' spins is considered to explain the nature of the ground state and its excitations, whereas three-, four-, and six-spin interactions are ignored. When these higher order processes occur in a loop they are called cyclic or ring exchange. The ring-exchange interaction is required to explain low temperature behavior in bulk and thin films of solid $^3$He [4-8]. It also plays a crucial role in the quantum magnet La$_2$CuO$_4$ [9,10]. Here, we use a combination of time domain THz (TDTS) and magneto-Raman spectroscopies to measure the low energy magnetic excitations in CoTiO$_3$, a proposed Dirac topological magnon material [11,12] where the origin of the energy gap in the magnon spectrum at the Brillouin zone center remains unclear. We measured the magnetic field dependence of the energies of the two lowest energy magnons and determine that the gap opens due to the ring-exchange interaction between the six spins in a hexagon. This interaction also explains the selection rules of the THz magnon absorption. Finally, we clarify that topological surface magnons are not expected in CoTiO$_3$. Our study demonstrates the power of combining TDTS and Raman spectroscopies with theory to identify the microscopic origins of the magnetic excitations in quantum magnets.Comment: 7 pages, 4 figures in main text, 26 pages and 11 figures in supplemen

Quantum Spin Ice Response to a Magnetic Field in the Dipole-Octupole Pyrochlore Ce2_2Zr2_2O7_7

We report new heat capacity measurements on single crystal Ce$_2$Zr$_2$O$_7$ down to $\sim$ 0.1 K in a magnetic field along the $[1,\bar{1}, 0]$ direction. These new measurements show that the broad hump in the zero-field heat capacity moves higher in temperature with increasing field strength and is split into two humps by the $[1,\bar{1}, 0]$ field at $\sim$ 2 T. These separate features are due to the decomposition of the pyrochlore lattice into effectively decoupled chains for fields in this direction: one set of chains ($\alpha$-chains) is polarized by the field while the other ($\beta$-chains) remains free. Our theoretical modelling suggests that the $\beta$-chains are close to a critical state, with nearly-gapless excitations. We also report new elastic and inelastic neutron scattering measurements on single crystal Ce$_2$Zr$_2$O$_7$ in $[1, \bar{1}, 0]$ and $[0, 0, 1]$ magnetic fields at temperatures down to 0.03 K. The elastic scattering behaves consistently with the formation of independent chains for a $[1, \bar{1}, 0]$ field, while the $[0, 0, 1]$ field produces a single field-induced magnetic Bragg peak at $(0, 2, 0)$ and equivalent wavevectors, indicating a polarized spin ice for fields above $\sim$ 3 T. For both $[1, \bar{1}, 0]$ and $[0, 0, 1]$ fields, our inelastic neutron scattering results show an approximately-dispersionless continuum of scattering that increases in both energy and intensity with increasing field strength. By modelling the complete set of experimental data using numerical linked cluster and semiclassical molecular dynamics calculations, we demonstrate the dominantly multipolar nature of the exchange interactions in Ce$_2$Zr$_2$O$_7$ and the smallness of the parameter $\theta$ which controls the mixing between dipolar and octupolar degrees of freedom. These results support previous estimates of the microscopic exchange parameters.Comment: 20 pages, 10 figure

Reply to "Comment on: 'Case for a U(1)π_\pi Quantum Spin Liquid Ground State in the Dipole-Octupole Pyrochlore Ce2Zr2O7\mathrm{Ce}_2\mathrm{Zr}_2\mathrm{O}_7' "

In his comment [arXiv:2209.03235], S. W. Lovesey argues that our analysis of neutron scattering experiments performed on Ce$_2$Zr$_2$O$_7$ is invalid. Lovesey argues that we have not properly accounted for the higher-order multipolar contributions to the magnetic scattering and that our use of pseudospin-$1/2$ operators to describe the scattering is inappropriate. In this reply, we show that the multipolar corrections discussed by Lovesey only become significant at scattering wavevectors exceeding those accessed in our experiments. This in no way contradicts or undermines our work, which never claimed a direct observation of scattering from higher-order multipoles. We further show that Lovesey's objections to our use of pseudospins are unfounded, and that the pseudospin operators are able to describe all magnetic scattering processes at the energy scale of our experiments, far below the crystal field gap. Finally, we comment on certain assumptions in Lovesey's calculations of the scattering amplitude which are inconsistent with experiment.Comment: 6 pages, 1 figur