Muscle MRI in Patients with Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy: A Longitudinal Study

Background and ObjectivesOculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) is a rare progressive neuromuscular disease. MRI is one of the techniques that is used in neuromuscular disorders to evaluate muscle alterations. The aim of this study was to describe the pattern of fatty infiltration of orofacial and leg muscles using quantitative muscle MRI in a large national cohort and to determine whether MRI can be used as an imaging biomarker of disease progression in OPMD.MethodsPatients with OPMD (18 years or older) were invited from the national neuromuscular database or by their treating physicians and were examined twice with an interval of 20 months, with quantitative MRI of orofacial and leg muscles to assess fatty infiltration which were compared with clinical measures.ResultsIn 43 patients with genetically confirmed OPMD, the muscles that were affected most severely were the tongue (mean fat fraction: 37.0%, SD 16.6), adductor magnus (31.9%; 27.1), and soleus (27.9%; 21.5) muscles. The rectus femoris and tibialis anterior muscles were least severely affected (mean fat fractions: 6.8%; SD 4.7, 7.5%; 5.9). Eleven of 14 significant correlations were found between fat fraction and a clinical task in the corresponding muscles (r = -0.312 to -0.769, CI = -0.874 to -0.005). At follow-up, fat fractions had increased significantly in 17 of the 26 muscles: mean 1.7% in the upper leg muscles (CI = 0.8-2.4), 1.7% (1.0-2.3) in the lower leg muscles, and 1.9% (0.6-3.3) in the orofacial muscles (p < 0.05). The largest increase was seen for the soleus (3.8%, CI = 2.5-5.1). Correlations were found between disease duration and repeat length vs increased fat fraction in 7 leg muscles (r = 0.323 to -0.412, p < 0.05).DiscussionAccording to quantitative muscle MRI, the tongue, adductor magnus and soleus show the largest fat infiltration levels in patients with OPMD. Fat fractions increased in several orofacial and leg muscles over 20 months, with the largest fat fraction increase seen in the soleus. This study supports that this technique is sensitive enough to show worsening in fat fractions of orofacial and leg muscles and therefore a responsive biomarker for future clinical trials

Multifocal occurrence of extra-abdominal desmoid type fibromatosis – A rare manifestation. A clinicopathological study of 6 sporadic cases and 1 hereditary case

Desmoid-type fibromatosis, also called desmoid tumor, is a locally aggressive myofibroblastic neoplasm that usually arises in deep soft tissue with significant potential for local recurrence. It displays an unpredictable clinical course. β-Catenin, the genetic key player of desmoid tumors shows nuclear accumulation due to mutations that prevent its degradation leading to activation of Wnt signaling and myofibroblastic cell proliferation. The corresponding hot spot mutations are located in exon 3 of the CTNNB1 gene or alternatively, in the APC tumor suppressor gene, most often as a germline mutation. Multifocal desmoid tumors are very rare and clinical characteristics are poorly understood. Here we present six sporadic and one familial case of multifocal desmoid tumors. Four female and three male patients, aged between 7 and 30 years (mean 18.4 years) were identified in a cohort of 1392 cases. Tumors were located in (distal) extremities, thorax, breast, abdominal wall, shoulder, and neck. Four cases showed a CTNNB1 mutation and one an APC germline mutation. In two sporadic cases no CTNNB1 mutation was identified. Four patients showed (multiple) recurrences and one patient was lost to follow-up. In conclusion, multifocal desmoid tumors are a very rare disease and may occur in sporadic cases that are characterized by recurrent CTNNB1 mutations. However, the underlying pathogenesis of multifocal desmoid tumors remains poorly understood with often aggressive clinical behavior and challenging therapeutical management

Multifocal occurrence of extra-abdominal desmoid type fibromatosis – A rare manifestation. A clinicopathological study of 6 sporadic cases and 1 hereditary case

Desmoid-type fibromatosis, also called desmoid tumor, is a locally aggressive myofibroblastic neoplasm that usually arises in deep soft tissue with significant potential for local recurrence. It displays an unpredictable clinical course. β-Catenin, the genetic key player of desmoid tumors shows nuclear accumulation due to mutations that prevent its degradation leading to activation of Wnt signaling and myofibroblastic cell proliferation. The corresponding hot spot mutations are located in exon 3 of the CTNNB1 gene or alternatively, in the APC tumor suppressor gene, most often as a germline mutation. Multifocal desmoid tumors are very rare and clinical characteristics are poorly understood. Here we present six sporadic and one familial case of multifocal desmoid tumors. Four female and three male patients, aged between 7 and 30 years (mean 18.4 years) were identified in a cohort of 1392 cases. Tumors were located in (distal) extremities, thorax, breast, abdominal wall, shoulder, and neck. Four cases showed a CTNNB1 mutation and one an APC germline mutation. In two sporadic cases no CTNNB1 mutation was identified. Four patients showed (multiple) recurrences and one patient was lost to follow-up. In conclusion, multifocal desmoid tumors are a very rare disease and may occur in sporadic cases that are characterized by recurrent CTNNB1 mutations. However, the underlying pathogenesis of multifocal desmoid tumors remains poorly understood with often aggressive clinical behavior and challenging therapeutical management

The diagnostic value of 18F–FDG-PET/CT and MRI in suspected vertebral osteomyelitis – a prospective study

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of 18F–fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing vertebral osteomyelitis. Methods: From November 2015 until December 2016, 32 patients with suspected vertebral osteomyelitis were prospectively included. All patients underwent both 18F–FDG-PET/CT and MRI within 48 h. All images were independently reevaluated by two radiologists and two nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to each others’ image interpretation. 18F–FDG-PET/CT and MRI were compared to the clinical diagnosis according to international guidelines. Results: For 18F–FDG-PET/CT, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in diagnosing vertebral osteomyelitis were 100%, 83.3%, 90.9%, and 100%, respectively. For MRI, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 100%, 91.7%, 95.2%, and 100%, respectively. MRI detected more epidural/spinal abscesses. An important advantage of 18F–FDG-PET/CT is the detection of metastatic infection (16 patients, 50.0%). Conclusion: 18F–FDG-PET/CT and MRI are both necessary techniques in diagnosing vertebral osteomyelitis. An important advantage of 18F–FDG-PET/CT is the visualization of metastatic infection, especially in patients with bacteremia. MRI is more sensitive in detection of small epidural abscesses

Soft tissue tumor imaging in adults : whole-body staging in sarcoma, non-malignant entities requiring special algorithms, pitfalls and special imaging aspects. Guidelines 2024 from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)

Abstract: Objectives The revised European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus guidelines on soft tissue tumor imaging represent an update of 2015 after technical advancements, further insights into specific entities, and revised World Health Organization (2020) and AJCC (2017) classifications. This second of three papers covers algorithms once histology is confirmed: (1) standardized whole-body staging, (2) special algorithms for non-malignant entities, and (3) multiplicity, genetic tumor syndromes, and pitfalls. Materials and methods A validated Delphi method based on peer-reviewed literature was used to derive consensus among a panel of 46 specialized musculoskeletal radiologists from 12 European countries. Statements that had undergone interdisciplinary revision were scored online by the level of agreement (0 to 10) during two iterative rounds, that could result in \u2018group consensus\u2019, \u2018group agreement\u2019, or \u2018lack of agreement\u2019. Results The three sections contain 24 statements with comments. Group consensus was reached in 95.8% and group agreement in 4.2%. For whole-body staging, pulmonary MDCT should be performed in all high-grade sarcomas

Soft tissue tumor imaging in adults : European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology-Guidelines 2023\u2014overview, and primary local imaging: how and where?

Abstract: ObjectivesEarly, accurate diagnosis is crucial for the prognosis of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. To this end, standardization of imaging algorithms, technical requirements, and reporting is therefore a prerequisite. Since the first European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus in 2015, technical achievements, further insights into specific entities, and the revised WHO-classification (2020) and AJCC staging system (2017) made an update necessary. The guidelines are intended to support radiologists in their decision-making and contribute to interdisciplinary tumor board discussions.Materials and methodsA validated Delphi method based on peer-reviewed literature was used to derive consensus among a panel of 46 specialized musculoskeletal radiologists from 12 European countries. Statements were scored online by level of agreement (0 to 10) during two iterative rounds. Either "group consensus," "group agreement," or "lack of agreement" was achieved.ResultsEight sections were defined that finally contained 145 statements with comments. Overall, group consensus was reached in 95.9%, and group agreement in 4.1%. This communication contains the first part consisting of the imaging algorithm for suspected soft tissue tumors, methods for local imaging, and the role of tumor centers.ConclusionUltrasound represents the initial triage imaging modality for accessible and small tumors. MRI is the modality of choice for the characterization and local staging of most soft tissue tumors. CT is indicated in special situations. In suspicious or likely malignant tumors, a specialist tumor center should be contacted for referral or teleradiologic second opinion. This should be done before performing a biopsy, without exception.Clinical relevanceThe updated ESSR soft tissue tumor imaging guidelines aim to provide best practice expert consensus for standardized imaging, to support radiologists in their decision-making, and to improve examination comparability both in individual patients and in future studies on individualized strategies.Key Points center dot Ultrasound remains the best initial triage imaging modality for accessible and small suspected soft tissue tumors.center dot MRI is the modality of choice for the characterization and local staging of soft tissue tumors in most cases; CT is indicated in special situations. Suspicious or likely malignant tumors should undergo biopsy.center dot In patients with large, indeterminate or suspicious tumors, a tumor reference center should be contacted for referral or teleradiologic second opinion; this must be done before a biopsy.Key Points center dot Ultrasound remains the best initial triage imaging modality for accessible and small suspected soft tissue tumors.center dot MRI is the modality of choice for the characterization and local staging of soft tissue tumors in most cases; CT is indicated in special situations. Suspicious or likely malignant tumors should undergo biopsy.center dot In patients with large, indeterminate or suspicious tumors, a tumor reference center should be contacted for referral or teleradiologic second opinion; this must be done before a biopsy.Key Points center dot Ultrasound remains the best initial triage imaging modality for accessible and small suspected soft tissue tumors.center dot MRI is the modality of choice for the characterization and local staging of soft tissue tumors in most cases; CT is indicated in special situations. Suspicious or likely malignant tumors should undergo biopsy. center dot In patients with large, indeterminate or suspicious tumors, a tumor reference center should be contacted for referral or teleradiologic second opinion; this must be done before a biopsy