The clinical effectiveness of an integrated multidisciplinary evidence-based program to prevent intraoperative pressure injuries in high-risk children undergoing long-duration surgical procedures: a quality improvement study

The prevention of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) in children undergoing long-duration surgical procedures is of critical importance due to the potential for catastrophic sequelae of these generally preventable injuries for the child and their family. Long-duration surgical procedures in children have the potential to result in high rates of HAPI due to physiological factors and the difficulty or impossibility of repositioning these patients intraoperatively. We developed and implemented a multi-modal, multi-disciplinary translational HAPI prevention quality improvement program at a large European Paediatric University Teaching Hospital. The intervention comprised the establishment of wound prevention teams, modified HAPI risk assessment tools, specific education, and the use of prophylactic dressings and fluidized positioners during long-duration surgical procedures. As part of the evaluation of the effectiveness of the program in reducing intraoperative HAPI, we conducted a prospective cohort study of 200 children undergoing long-duration surgical procedures and compared their outcomes with a matched historical cohort of 200 children who had undergone similar surgery the previous year. The findings demonstrated a reduction in HAPI in the intervention cohort of 80% (p < 0.01) compared to the comparator group when controlling for age, pathology, comorbidity, and surgical duration. We believe that the findings demonstrate that it is possible to significantly decrease HAPI incidence in these highly vulnerable children by using an evidence-based, multi-modal, multidisciplinary HAPI prevention strategy

Decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: patient age and outcome

The overall degree by which different patients may benefit from decompressive craniectomy (DC) remains controversial. In particular, the prognostic value of age has been investigated by very few studies. Many authors state there is no significant benefit in performing a DC in severe head injury after a certain age limit, with most placing the limit at 30-50 years of age. Between 1994 and 2004, 55 patients underwent DC at our institution. Advanced age did not constitute a contraindication to surgery for both ethical and cultural reasons. Thus, the data obtained were not biased by a selection of patients based on age. We analyzed potential predictors of outcome after DC, including sex, age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and presence of mass lesion. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. The independent contribution of predictive factors to outcome was studied using logistic regression analysis. Initial GCS score was found to be an independent predictor of outcome (p = 0.001). No difference in the outcome was observed between patients with GCS 6-8 and GCS 9-15. These two groups have a better prognosis than patients with GCS 3-5. Logistic regression analysis showed age as an independent predictive factor to outcome (p = 0.005). A difference in outcome exists among patients over 65 and patients aged <or=65, while groups aged <40 and 40-65 showed no difference in outcome. Based on these findings, we believe that the age limit for performing DC should be revised