Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics

A Review of Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics by David M. O\u27Brie

What Process is Due? Courts and Science-Policy Disputes

A Review of What Process is Due? Courts and Science-Policy Disputes by David M. O\u27Brie

The Public\u27s Right to Know: The Supreme Court as Pandora?

A Review of The Public\u27s Right to Know: The Supreme Court and the First Amendment by David M. O\u27Brie

Book Review: Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics. by David M. O’Brien.

Book review: Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics. By David M. O\u27Brien. New York, N.Y.: W. W. Norton & Company. 1986. Pp. 384. Reviewed by: Jeffrey Brandon Morris

Book Review: Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics. by David M. O’Brien.

Book review: Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics. By David M. O\u27Brien. New York, N.Y.: W. W. Norton & Company. 1986. Pp. 384. Reviewed by: Jeffrey Brandon Morris

Book Review: The Unpublished Opinions of the Warren Court. by Bernard Schwartz; Swann\u27s Way: The School Busing Case and the Supreme Court. by Bernard Schwartz.

Book review: The Unpublished Opinions of the Warren Court. By Bernard Schwartz. New York: Oxford University Press. 1985. Pp. ix, 470 ; Swann\u27s Way: The School Busing Case and the Supreme Court. By Bernard Schwartz. New York: Oxford University Press. 1986. Pp. 245. Reviewed by: David M. O\u27Brien

Book Review: The Unpublished Opinions of the Warren Court. by Bernard Schwartz; Swann\u27s Way: The School Busing Case and the Supreme Court. by Bernard Schwartz.

Book review: The Unpublished Opinions of the Warren Court. By Bernard Schwartz. New York: Oxford University Press. 1985. Pp. ix, 470 ; Swann\u27s Way: The School Busing Case and the Supreme Court. By Bernard Schwartz. New York: Oxford University Press. 1986. Pp. 245. Reviewed by: David M. O\u27Brien

The Pedagogical Considerations of Using a Constitutional Law Textbook in Political Science

This Review first describes the importance of each consideration by analyzing how a two-volume constitutional law casebook, written by Professor David M. O\u27Brien of the Woodrow Wilson Department of Government and Foreign Affairs at the University of Virginia, can be admirably employed to teach the principle that constitutional law is, in fact, politics. Overall, the volumes are excellent undergraduate political science constitutional law texts. However, the casebook volumes have two flaws. First, they do not address the vital question of what is political science?, a query that ought to be routinely asked by anyone teaching public law courses. Second, they omit sufficient explanation of the fundamentals of conducting legal research and writing, including citation style. These criticisms are explored in more detail in the Review\u27s concluding section

The Pedagogical Considerations of Using a Constitutional Law Textbook in Political Science

This Review first describes the importance of each consideration by analyzing how a two-volume constitutional law casebook, written by Professor David M. O\u27Brien of the Woodrow Wilson Department of Government and Foreign Affairs at the University of Virginia, can be admirably employed to teach the principle that constitutional law is, in fact, politics. Overall, the volumes are excellent undergraduate political science constitutional law texts. However, the casebook volumes have two flaws. First, they do not address the vital question of what is political science?, a query that ought to be routinely asked by anyone teaching public law courses. Second, they omit sufficient explanation of the fundamentals of conducting legal research and writing, including citation style. These criticisms are explored in more detail in the Review\u27s concluding section