Combined epicardial and endocardial ablation for atrial fibrillation:Best practices and guide to hybrid convergent procedures

The absence of strategies to consistently and effectively address nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation by nonpharmacological interventions has represented a long-standing treatment gap. A combined epicardial/endocardial ablation strategy, the hybrid Convergent procedure, was developed in response to this clinical need. A subxiphoid incision is used to access the pericardial space facilitating an epicardial ablation directed at isolation of the posterior wall of the left atrium. This is followed by an endocardial ablation to complete isolation of the pulmonary veins and for additional ablation as needed. Experience gained with the hybrid Convergent procedure during the last decade has led to the development and adoption of strategies to optimize the technique and mitigate risks. Additionally, a surgical and electrophysiology "team" approach including comprehensive training is believed critical to successfully develop the hybrid Convergent program. A recently completed randomized clinical trial indicated that this ablation strategy is superior to an endocardial-only approach for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. In this review, we propose and describe best practice guidelines for hybrid Convergent ablation on the basis of a combination of published data, author consensus, and expert opinion. A summary of clinical outcomes, emerging evidence, and future perspectives is also given

Phased RF ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND Persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) often requires extensive and/or repeat radiofrequency (RF) ablation procedures. OBJECTIVE The Tailored Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (TTOP-AF) study assessed the effectiveness and safety of the phased RF system in a randomized controlled comparison of medical therapy against phased RF ablation for the management of persistent and long-standing persistent AF. METHODS Patients who had failed at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) were randomized (2:1) to ablation management (AM) or medical management (MM). AM patients were allowed up to 2 ablations. Index and retreatment procedures consisted of pulmonary vein isolation and ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms. MM patients received AAD changes and/or cardioversion. The primary end points of the TTOP-AF study included chronic effectiveness and safety at 6 months and acute safety within 7 days of ablation. RESULTS At 6 months, a greater proportion of AM patients achieved effectiveness off AAD (77 of 138 [55.8%]) compared to MM patients (19 of 72 [26.4%]) (P <.0001). Acutely, 92.8% (128/138) of the procedures were successful while 12.3% (17/138) experienced a serious procedure and/or device-related adverse event . The predefined acute safety end point was not met. The proportion of patients with chronic safety events did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS Catheter ablation of persistent/long-standing persistent AF with the phased RF ablation system is effective with greater reduction of AF compared with MM. More intense anti-coagulation strategies, careful attention to catheter placement relative to the pulmonary vein ostia, and elimination of electrode interaction are expected to reduce the risk of stroke, pulmonary vein stenosis, and asymptomatic cerebral embol