The molecular biology and pyridoxine responsiveness of X-linked sideroblastic anaemia. Haematologica 1998;83: 56–70

Pyridoxine-responsive, X-linked sideroblastic anaemia (XLSA) has been shown to be caused by missense mutations in the erythroid-specific ALA synthase gene, ALAS2. These are scattered widely across the part of the gene encoding the catalytic domain and in half the cases affect residues conserved throughout evolution. Only a loose correlation has been found between the in vitro kinetics and stability of the catalytic activity of the recombinant variant enzymes and the in vivo severity and pyridoxine-responsiveness of the anaemia. Enhanced instability in the absence of pyridoxal phosphate (PLP) or decreased PLP and substrate binding have been noted. A detailed explanation of the anaemia and its response to pyridoxine, however, requires greater insight into the structurefunction relationships of this protein than we have at present. Knowledge of its tertiary structure and further knowledge of intracellular factors which impinge on the ability of normal and variant ALAS2 to contribute to haemoglobin production are also required. Mutations in the same gene which affect mitochondrial processing, terminate translation prematurely, or are thought to abolish function altogether cause an XLSA that is refractory to treatment with pyridoxine. A major complication of this disorder is its accompanying increased iron absorption and iron overload which occurs in patients and female heterozygotes. Mutation detection enables the early diagnosis of those affected, targeted education of families, early treatment with pyridoxine and prevention of iron overload. It also allows for a distinction to be made between late-onset variants of this condition and the more insidious refractory anaemia with ring sideroblasts. The next few years of investigation should be illuminating as tools now exist to study all aspects of this protein from the gene to the mitochondrial matrix

Association of germline variants in telomere maintenance genes (POT1, TERF2IP, ACD, and TERT) with spitzoid morphology in familial melanoma: A multi-center case seriesCapsule Summary

Background: Spitzoid morphology in familial melanoma has been associated with germline variants in POT1, a telomere maintenance gene (TMG), suggesting a link between telomere biology and spitzoid differentiation. Objective: To assess if familial melanoma cases associated with germline variants in TMG (POT1, ACD, TERF2IP, and TERT) commonly exhibit spitzoid morphology. Methods: In this case series, melanomas were classified as having spitzoid morphology if at least 3 of 4 dermatopathologists reported this finding in ≥25% of tumor cells. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) of spitzoid morphology compared to familial melanomas from unmatched noncarriers that were previously reviewed by a National Cancer Institute dermatopathologist. Results: Spitzoid morphology was observed in 77% (23 of 30), 75% (3 of 4), 50% (2 of 4), and 50% (1 of 2) of melanomas from individuals with germline variants in POT1, TERF2IP, ACD, and TERT, respectively. Compared to noncarriers (n = 139 melanomas), POT1 carriers (OR = 225.1, 95% confidence interval: 51.7-980.5; P < .001) and individuals with TERF2IP, ACD, and TERT variants (OR = 82.4, 95% confidence interval: 21.3-494.6; P < .001) had increased odds of spitzoid morphology. Limitations: Findings may not be generalizable to nonfamilial melanoma cases. Conclusion: Spitzoid morphology in familial melanoma could suggest germline alteration of TMG

Maternal and neonatal outcomes after caesarean delivery in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Maternal and neonatal mortality is high in Africa, but few large, prospective studies have been done to investigate the risk factors associated with these poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: A 7-day, international, prospective, observational cohort study was done in patients having caesarean delivery in 183 hospitals across 22 countries in Africa. The inclusion criteria were all consecutive patients (aged ≥18 years) admitted to participating centres having elective and non-elective caesarean delivery during the 7-day study cohort period. To ensure a representative sample, each hospital had to provide data for 90% of the eligible patients during the recruitment week. The primary outcome was in-hospital maternal mortality and complications, which were assessed by local investigators. The study was registered on the South African National Health Research Database, number KZ_2015RP7_22, and on ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03044899. FINDINGS: Between February, 2016, and May, 2016, 3792 patients were recruited from hospitals across Africa. 3685 were included in the postoperative complications analysis (107 missing data) and 3684 were included in the maternal mortality analysis (108 missing data). These hospitals had a combined number of specialist surgeons, obstetricians, and anaesthetists totalling 0·7 per 100 000 population (IQR 0·2-2·0). Maternal mortality was 20 (0·5%) of 3684 patients (95% CI 0·3-0·8). Complications occurred in 633 (17·4%) of 3636 mothers (16·2-18·6), which were predominantly severe intraoperative and postoperative bleeding (136 [3·8%] of 3612 mothers). Maternal mortality was independently associated with a preoperative presentation of placenta praevia, placental abruption, ruptured uterus, antepartum haemorrhage (odds ratio 4·47 [95% CI 1·46-13·65]), and perioperative severe obstetric haemorrhage (5·87 [1·99-17·34]) or anaesthesia complications (11·47 (1·20-109·20]). Neonatal mortality was 153 (4·4%) of 3506 infants (95% CI 3·7-5·0). INTERPRETATION: Maternal mortality after caesarean delivery in Africa is 50 times higher than that of high-income countries and is driven by peripartum haemorrhage and anaesthesia complications. Neonatal mortality is double the global average. Early identification and appropriate management of mothers at risk of peripartum haemorrhage might improve maternal and neonatal outcomes in Africa. FUNDING: Medical Research Council of South Africa.Medical Research Council of South Africa