Cognitive and affective perspective-taking in conduct-disordered children high and low on callous-unemotional traits

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Deficits in cognitive and/or affective perspective-taking have been implicated in Conduct-Disorder (CD), but empirical investigations produced equivocal results. Two factors may be implicated: (a) distinct deficits underlying the antisocial conduct of CD subgroups, (b) plausible disjunction between cognitive and affective perspective-taking with subgroups presenting either cognitive or affective-specific deficits.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>This study employed a second-order false-belief paradigm in which the cognitive perspective-taking questions tapped the character's thoughts and the affective perspective-taking questions tapped the emotions generated by these thoughts. Affective and cognitive perspective-taking was compared across three groups of children: (a) CD elevated on Callous-Unemotional traits (<it>CD-high-CU</it>, <it>n </it>= 30), (b) CD low on CU traits (<it>CD-low-CU</it>, <it>n </it>= 42), and (c) a 'typically-developing' comparison group (<it>n </it>= 50), matched in age (7.5 – 10.8), gender and socioeconomic background.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The results revealed deficits in <it>CD-low-CU </it>children for both affective and cognitive perspective-taking. In contrast <it>CD-high-CU </it>children showed relative competency in cognitive, but deficits in affective-perspective taking, a finding that suggests an affective-specific defect and a plausible dissociation of affective and cognitive perspective-taking in <it>CD-high-CU </it>children.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Present findings indicate that deficits in cognitive perspective-taking that have long been implicated in CD appear to be characteristic of a subset of CD children. In contrast affective perspective-taking deficits characterise both CD subgroups, but these defects seem to be following diverse developmental paths that warrant further investigation.</p