16 research outputs found

    Molecular Mechanisms Governing Muscle Wasting in Cancer

    Get PDF
    Pancreatic cancer is the third-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. About 80 percent of the pancreatic cancer patients suffer from cachexia and, about one-third die due to complexities related to the syndrome. Cachexia leads to a loss in body weight and cachectic patients are refractory to chemotherapy. Despite recent advances, the mechanisms of pancreatic cancer- cachexia and the potential therapeutic interventions remain poorly evaluated. Sirtuins represent a class of proteins that are regulated by metabolic fluctuations in tissues. We observed a reduced expression of Sirt1 in spontaneous PDAC mice muscles, human pancreatic cancer muscles, and myotubes treated by cancer cell-conditioned media. We further observed that cancer cell-conditioned media upregulated the NF-ÎșB and FoxO transcription factor pathways. NF-ÎșB regulated the expression of NADPH Oxidase (Nox4) in cachectic muscles, thereby increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS). We also observed a negative correlation between Nox4 expression and muscle cross-sectional area in the cachectic muscles of PDAC patients. Inducible genetic knockout of Nox4 gene in muscles of tumor-bearing mice rescued the cachectic phenotype. Moreover, pharmacological blockade of Nox4 activity was successful in attenuating loss in body weight and muscle mass in tumor-bearing mice. Therefore, we concluded that the Sirt1-Nox4 axis plays an important role in the manifestation of pancreatic cancer cachexia. Studies have shown that chemotherapy in addition to tumor burden can induce body weight loss in cancer patients. We performed a single-center retrospective study of 162 patients at our institution by measuring muscle mass among patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer at initial diagnosis and eight-week follow up post treatment. We found a significant improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with modest or no reduction in skeletal muscle index after eight weeks of chemotherapy. Furthermore, we treated mice with Gemcitabine and FOLFIRINOX, and observed a decrease in body weight, gastrocnemius muscle weight, grip-strength, and rotarod performance. We also observed an increase in chemotherapy-induced ROS in the mice. We observed that utilizing BMX-001, a SOD mimetic rescued the decrease in body weight, muscle weight, grip-strength, and rotarod performance in mice treated with chemotherapy. BMX-001 was also successful in rescuing chemotherapy-induced muscle wasting in tumor-bearing mice. We concluded that targeting ROS production in skeletal muscles could prevent chemotherapy-induced muscle wasting

    Metabolic Alterations in Pancreatic Cancer Progression

    Get PDF
    Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the USA. Pancreatic tumors are characterized by enhanced glycolytic metabolism promoted by a hypoxic tumor microenvironment and a resultant acidic milieu. The metabolic reprogramming allows cancer cells to survive hostile microenvironments. Through the analysis of the principal metabolic pathways, we identified the specific metabolites that are altered during pancreatic cancer progression in the spontaneous progression (KPC) mouse model. Genetically engineered mice exhibited metabolic alterations during PanINs formation, even before the tumor development. To account for other cells in the tumor microenvironment and to focus on metabolic adaptations concerning tumorigenic cells only, we compared the metabolic profile of KPC and orthotopic tumors with those obtained from KPC-tumor derived cell lines. We observed significant upregulation of glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway metabolites even at the early stages of pathogenesis. Other biosynthetic pathways also demonstrated a few common perturbations. While some of the metabolic changes in tumor cells are not detectable in orthotopic and spontaneous tumors, a significant number of tumor cell-intrinsic metabolic alterations are readily detectable in the animal models. Overall, we identified that metabolic alterations in precancerous lesions are maintained during cancer development and are largely mirrored by cancer cells in culture conditions

    Silibinin-mediated metabolic reprogramming attenuates pancreatic cancer-induced cachexia and tumor growth.

    Get PDF
    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. Cancer-associated cachexia is present in up to 80% of PDAC patients and is associated with aggressive disease and poor prognosis. In the present studies we evaluated an anti-cancer natural product silibinin for its effectiveness in targeting pancreatic cancer aggressiveness and the cachectic properties of pancreatic cancer cells and tumors. Our results demonstrate that silibinin inhibits pancreatic cancer cell growth in a dose-dependent manner and reduces glycolytic activity of cancer cells. Our LC-MS/MS based metabolomics data demonstrates that silibinin treatment induces global metabolic reprogramming in pancreatic cancer cells. Silibinin treatment diminishes c-MYC expression, a key regulator of cancer metabolism. Furthermore, we observed reduced STAT3 signaling in silibinin-treated cancer cells. Overexpression of constitutively active STAT3 was sufficient to substantially revert the silibinin-induced downregulation of c-MYC and the metabolic phenotype. Our in vivo investigations demonstrate that silibinin reduces tumor growth and proliferation in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer and prevents the loss of body weight and muscle. It also improves physical activity including grip strength and latency to fall in tumor-bearing mice. In conclusion, silibinin-induced metabolic reprogramming diminishes cell growth and cachectic properties of pancreatic cancer cells and animal models

    SIRT1-NOX4 signaling axis regulates cancer cachexia.

    No full text

    Non-Viral Vectors for Delivery of Nucleic Acid Therapies for Cancer

    No full text
    The research and development of non-viral gene therapy has been extensive over the past decade and has received a big push thanks to the recent successful approval of non-viral nucleic acid therapy products. Despite these developments, nucleic acid therapy applications in cancer have been limited. One of the main causes of this has been the imbalance in development of delivery vectors as compared with sophisticated nucleic acid payloads, such as siRNA, mRNA, etc. This paper reviews non-viral vectors that can be used to deliver nucleic acids for cancer treatment. It discusses various types of vectors and highlights their current applications. Additionally, it discusses a perspective on the current regulatory landscape to facilitate the commercial translation of gene therapy

    Muscle stem cells contribute to long‐term tissue repletion following surgical sepsis

    No full text
    Abstract Background Over the past decade, advances in sepsis identification and management have resulted in decreased sepsis mortality. This increase in survivorship has highlighted a new clinical obstacle: chronic critical illness (CCI), for which there are no effective treatment options. Up to half of sepsis survivors suffer from CCI, which can include multi‐organ dysfunction, chronic inflammation, muscle wasting, physical and mental disabilities, and enhanced frailty. These symptoms prevent survivors from returning to regular day‐to‐day activities and are directly associated with poor quality of life. Methods Mice were subjected to cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) with daily chronic stress (DCS) as an in vivo model to study sepsis late‐effects/sequelae on skeletal muscle components. Longitudinal monitoring was performed via magnetic resonance imaging, skeletal muscle and/or muscle stem cell (MuSCs) assays (e.g., post‐necropsy wet muscle weights, minimum Feret diameter measurements, in vitro MuSC proliferation and differentiation, number of regenerating myofibres and numbers of Pax7‐positive nuclei per myofibre), post‐sepsis whole muscle metabolomics and MuSC isolation and high‐content transcriptional profiling. Results We report several findings supporting the hypothesis that MuSCs/muscle regeneration are critically involved in post‐sepsis muscle recovery. First, we show that genetic ablation of muscle stem cells (MuSCs) impairs post‐sepsis muscle recovery (maintenance of 5–8% average lean mass loss compared with controls). Second, we observe impaired MuSCs expansion capacity and morphological defects at 26 days post‐sepsis compared with control MuSCs (P < 0.001). Third, when subjected to an experimental muscle injury, sepsis‐recovered mice exhibited evidence of impaired muscle regeneration compared with non‐septic mice receiving the same muscle injury (CLP/DCS injured mean minimum Feret is 92.1% of control injured, P < 0.01). Fourth, we performed a longitudinal RNA sequencing study on MuSCs isolated from post‐sepsis mice and found clear transcriptional differences in all post‐sepsis samples compared with controls. At Day 28, CLP/DCS mice satellite cells have multiple altered metabolic pathways, such as oxidative phosphorylation, mitochondrial dysfunction, sirtuin signalling and oestrogen receptor signalling, compared with controls (P < 0.001). Conclusions Our data show that MuSCs and muscle regeneration are required for effective post‐sepsis muscle recovery and that sepsis triggers morphological, functional, and transcriptional changes in MuSCs. Moving forward, we strive to leverage a more complete understanding of post‐sepsis MuSC/regenerative defects to identify and test novel therapies that promote muscle recovery and improve quality of life in sepsis survivors

    Metabolic Alterations in Pancreatic Cancer Progression

    No full text
    Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the USA. Pancreatic tumors are characterized by enhanced glycolytic metabolism promoted by a hypoxic tumor microenvironment and a resultant acidic milieu. The metabolic reprogramming allows cancer cells to survive hostile microenvironments. Through the analysis of the principal metabolic pathways, we identified the specific metabolites that are altered during pancreatic cancer progression in the spontaneous progression (KPC) mouse model. Genetically engineered mice exhibited metabolic alterations during PanINs formation, even before the tumor development. To account for other cells in the tumor microenvironment and to focus on metabolic adaptations concerning tumorigenic cells only, we compared the metabolic profile of KPC and orthotopic tumors with those obtained from KPC-tumor derived cell lines. We observed significant upregulation of glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway metabolites even at the early stages of pathogenesis. Other biosynthetic pathways also demonstrated a few common perturbations. While some of the metabolic changes in tumor cells are not detectable in orthotopic and spontaneous tumors, a significant number of tumor cell-intrinsic metabolic alterations are readily detectable in the animal models. Overall, we identified that metabolic alterations in precancerous lesions are maintained during cancer development and are largely mirrored by cancer cells in culture conditions

    Selective Inhibition of Histone Deacetylases 1/2/6 in Combination with Gemcitabine: A Promising Combination for Pancreatic Cancer Therapy

    No full text
    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a five-year survival rate of \u3c10% due in part to a lack of effective therapies. Pan-histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have shown preclinical efficacy against PDAC but have failed in the clinic due to toxicity. Selective HDAC inhibitors may reduce toxicity while retaining therapeutic efficacy. However, their use requires identification of the specific HDACs that mediate the therapeutic effects of HDAC inhibitors in PDAC. We determined that the HDAC1/2/3 inhibitor Mocetinostat synergizes with the HDAC4/5/6 inhibitor LMK-235 in a panel of PDAC cell lines. Furthermore, while neither drug alone synergizes with gemcitabine, the combination of Mocetinostat, LMK-235, and gemcitabine showed strong synergy. Using small interfering (si)RNA-mediated knockdown, this synergy was attributed to inhibition of HDACs 1, 2, and 6. Pharmacological inhibition of HDACs 1 and 2 with Romidepsin and HDAC6 with ACY-1215 also potently synergized with gemcitabine in a panel of PDAC cell lines, and this drug combination potentiated the antitumor effects of gemcitabine against PDAC xenografts in vivo. Collectively, our data show that inhibition of multiple HDACs is required for therapeutic effects of HDAC inhibitors and support the development of novel strategies to inhibit HDACs 1, 2, and 6 for PDAC therapy

    Selective Inhibition of Histone Deacetylases 1/2/6 in Combination with Gemcitabine: A Promising Combination for Pancreatic Cancer Therapy

    No full text
    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a five-year survival rate of &lt;10% due in part to a lack of effective therapies. Pan-histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have shown preclinical efficacy against PDAC but have failed in the clinic due to toxicity. Selective HDAC inhibitors may reduce toxicity while retaining therapeutic efficacy. However, their use requires identification of the specific HDACs that mediate the therapeutic effects of HDAC inhibitors in PDAC. We determined that the HDAC1/2/3 inhibitor Mocetinostat synergizes with the HDAC4/5/6 inhibitor LMK-235 in a panel of PDAC cell lines. Furthermore, while neither drug alone synergizes with gemcitabine, the combination of Mocetinostat, LMK-235, and gemcitabine showed strong synergy. Using small interfering (si)RNA-mediated knockdown, this synergy was attributed to inhibition of HDACs 1, 2, and 6. Pharmacological inhibition of HDACs 1 and 2 with Romidepsin and HDAC6 with ACY-1215 also potently synergized with gemcitabine in a panel of PDAC cell lines, and this drug combination potentiated the antitumor effects of gemcitabine against PDAC xenografts in vivo. Collectively, our data show that inhibition of multiple HDACs is required for therapeutic effects of HDAC inhibitors and support the development of novel strategies to inhibit HDACs 1, 2, and 6 for PDAC therapy
    corecore