An Investigation into the Potential of Targeting Escherichia coli rne mRNA with Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) Gapmers as an Antibacterial Strategy

The increase in antibacterial resistance is a serious challenge for both the health and defence sectors and there is a need for both novel antibacterial targets and antibacterial strategies. RNA degradation and ribonucleases, such as the essential endoribonuclease RNase E, encoded by the rne gene, are emerging as potential antibacterial targets while antisense oligonucleotides may provide alternative antibacterial strategies. As rne mRNA has not been previously targeted using an antisense approach, we decided to explore using antisense oligonucleotides to target the translation initiation region of the Escherichia coli rne mRNA. Antisense oligonucleotides were rationally designed and were synthesised as locked nucleic acid (LNA) gapmers to enable inhibition of rne mRNA translation through two mechanisms. Either LNA gapmer binding could sterically block translation and/or LNA gapmer binding could facilitate RNase H-mediated cleavage of the rne mRNA. This may prove to be an advantage over the majority of previous antibacterial antisense oligonucleotide approaches which used oligonucleotide chemistries that restrict the mode-of-action of the antisense oligonucleotide to steric blocking of translation. Using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay, we demonstrate that the LNA gapmers bind to the translation initiation region of E. coli rne mRNA. We then use a cell-free transcription translation reporter assay to show that this binding is capable of inhibiting translation. Finally, in an in vitro RNase H cleavage assay, the LNA gapmers facilitate RNase H-mediated mRNA cleavage. Although the challenges of antisense oligonucleotide delivery remain to be addressed, overall, this work lays the foundations for the development of a novel antibacterial strategy targeting rne mRNA with antisense oligonucleotides

Triple helix formation at (AT)(n) adjacent to an oligopurine tract

We have used DNase I footprinting to investigate the recognition of (AT) n tracts in duplex DNA using GT-containing oligonucleotides designed to form alternating G.TA and T.AT triplets. Previous studies have shown that the formation of these complexes is facilitated by anchoring the triplex with a block of adjacent T.AT triplets, i.e. using T11(TG)6to recognize the target A11(AT)6. (AT)6T11. In the present study we have examined how the stability of these complexes is affected by the length of either the T.AT tract or the region of alternating G.TA and T.AT triplets, using oligonucleotides of type T x (TG) y to recognize the sequence A11(AT)11. We find that successful triplex formation at (AT)n (n = 3, 6 or 11) can be achieved with a stabilizing tail of 11xT.AT triplets. The affinity of the third strand increases with the length of the (GT) n tract, suggesting that the alternating G.TA and T.AT triplets are making a positive contribution to stability. These complexes are stabilized by the presence of manganese or a triplex-specific binding ligand. Shorter oligo-nucleotides, such as T7(TG)5, bind less tightly and require the addition of a triplex-binding ligand. T4(GT)5showed no binding under any conditions. Oligo-nucleotides forming a 3'-terminal T.AT are marginally more stable that those with a terminal G.TA. The stability of these complexes was further increased by replacing two of the T.AT triplets in the T n tail region with two C+.GC triplets

Protein motion from non-specific to specific DNA by three-dimensional routes aided by supercoiling

DNA-binding proteins are generally thought to locate their target sites by first associating with the DNA at random and then translocating to the specific site by one-dimensional (1D) diffusion along the DNA. We report here that non-specific DNA conveys proteins to their target sites just as well when held near the target by catenation as when co-linear with the target. Hence, contrary to the prevalent view, proteins move from random to specific sites primarily by three-dimensional (3D) rather than 1D pathways, by multiple dissociation/re-association events within a single DNA molecule. We also uncover a role for DNA supercoiling in target-site location. Proteins find their sites more readily in supercoiled than in relaxed DNA, again indicating 3D rather than 1D routes

One recognition sequence, seven restriction enzymes, five reaction mechanisms

The diversity of reaction mechanisms employed by Type II restriction enzymes was investigated by analysing the reactions of seven endonucleases at the same DNA sequence. NarI, KasI, Mly113I, SfoI, EgeI, EheI and BbeI cleave DNA at several different positions in the sequence 5′-GGCGCC-3′. Their reactions on plasmids with one or two copies of this sequence revealed five distinct mechanisms. These differ in terms of the number of sites the enzyme binds, and the number of phosphodiester bonds cleaved per turnover. NarI binds two sites, but cleaves only one bond per DNA-binding event. KasI also cuts only one bond per turnover but acts at individual sites, preferring intact to nicked sites. Mly113I cuts both strands of its recognition sites, but shows full activity only when bound to two sites, which are then cleaved concertedly. SfoI, EgeI and EheI cut both strands at individual sites, in the manner historically considered as normal for Type II enzymes. Finally, BbeI displays an absolute requirement for two sites in close physical proximity, which are cleaved concertedly. The range of reaction mechanisms for restriction enzymes is thus larger than commonly imagined, as is the number of enzymes needing two recognition sites

One recognition sequence, seven restriction enzymes, five reaction mechanisms

The diversity of reaction mechanisms employed by Type II restriction enzymes was investigated by analysing the reactions of seven endonucleases at the same DNA sequence. NarI, KasI, Mly113I, SfoI, EgeI, EheI and BbeI cleave DNA at several different positions in the sequence 5′-GGCGCC-3′. Their reactions on plasmids with one or two copies of this sequence revealed five distinct mechanisms. These differ in terms of the number of sites the enzyme binds, and the number of phosphodiester bonds cleaved per turnover. NarI binds two sites, but cleaves only one bond per DNA-binding event. KasI also cuts only one bond per turnover but acts at individual sites, preferring intact to nicked sites. Mly113I cuts both strands of its recognition sites, but shows full activity only when bound to two sites, which are then cleaved concertedly. SfoI, EgeI and EheI cut both strands at individual sites, in the manner historically considered as normal for Type II enzymes. Finally, BbeI displays an absolute requirement for two sites in close physical proximity, which are cleaved concertedly. The range of reaction mechanisms for restriction enzymes is thus larger than commonly imagined, as is the number of enzymes needing two recognition sites

Allosteric inhibition of human exonuclease1 (hExo1) through a novel extended β-sheet conformation

Background: Human Exonuclease1 (hExo1) participates in the resection of DNA double-strand breaks by gen-erating long 3′-single-stranded DNA overhangs, critical for homology-based DNA repair and activation of the ATR-dependent checkpoint. The C-terminal region is essential for modulating the activity of hExo1, containing numerous sites of post-translational modification and binding sites for partner proteins. Methods: Analytical Ultracentrifugation (AUC), Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS), Circular Dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and enzymatic assays. Results: AUC and DLS indicates the C-terminal region has a highly extended structure while CD suggest a ten-dency to adopt a novel left-handed β-sheet structure, together implying the C-terminus may exhibit a transient fluctuating structure that could play a role in binding partner proteins known to regulate the activity of hExo1. Interaction with 14–3-3 protein has a cooperative inhibitory effect upon DNA resection activity, which indicates an allosteric transition occurs upon binding partner proteins. Conclusions: This study has uncovered that hExo1 consist of a folded N-terminal nuclease domain and a highly extended C-terminal region which is known to interact with partner proteins that regulates the activity of hExo1. A positively cooperative mechanism of binding allows for stringent control of hExo1 activity. Such a transition would coordinate the control of hExo1 by hExo1 regulators and hence allow careful coordination of the process of DNA end resection. Significance: The assays presented herein could be readily adapted to rapidly identify and characterise the effects of modulators of the interaction between the 14–3-3 proteins and hExo1. It is conceivable that small molecule modulators of 14–3-3 s-hExo1 interaction may serve as effective chemosensitizers for cancer therapy