5 research outputs found
Π§ΡΠΎ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π±ΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΌ: ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ
Π‘ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ (ΡΡΠ±)ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡ Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ. ΠΠΎΠ΄ (ΡΡΠ±)ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ/ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΈΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ ΡΠΊΡΠΊΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ β ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠ΅Π·Ρ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΠΏΠ°Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ°Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΡΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ³Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π΄Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ ΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ (ΡΡΠ±)ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ΅. Π‘ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ° ΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΠ° (ΡΡΠ±)ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΠΊΡΠΎ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΌ (ΡΡΠ±)ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡ, Π° ΠΊΡΠΎ β Β«ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π΅ΡΠΎΠΌΒ», ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΌ. ΠΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ (ΡΡΠ±)ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ Π·Π°ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π·Π° Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊ ΡΠ΅Π±Π΅ ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΉΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌΠ°: ΠΊΠΎΠΎΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°, ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΠ»Ρ, ΠΌΠΎΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π² ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅, ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Ρ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ². ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠ±Ρ Π²ΡΠΆΠΈΡΡ, Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΌ (ΡΡΠ±)ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ°ΠΌ (Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ, ΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΊΡ) ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ Β«ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΒ», Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ (Π³ΠΎΡΡ, ΡΠΌΠΎ) ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π° Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π·Π½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΉΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ.
Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Ρ (Π²ΠΎΡ)ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π° Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
(ΡΡΠ±)ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ°Ρ
/ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ
/ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π°Ρ
. ΠΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ Π±Π°Π·Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ Π΄Π²ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠ΅ΠΉΡ-ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈ: Π°Π½Π°ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄Π°ΡΠΊ-ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ. ΠΠ±Π° ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Ρ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ (Π³Π»ΡΠ±ΠΈΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΡ, Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ) Π² Π‘Π°Π½ΠΊΡ-ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ±ΡΡΠ³Π΅. Π§Π΅ΡΠ΅Π· ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ
Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅Π±Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π°Π½Π°ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ², ΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ², Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ², Π½Π΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ², Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ², ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π±ΡΡΡ Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΌ (Π³Π΄Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ»Π΅Π³Π°Π΅Ρ Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Β«Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΒ» ΠΈ Β«ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π΅ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈΒ») ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡ (ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π΅Ρ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΊ) Π²Π»ΠΈΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
(ΡΡΠ±)ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡ
Π‘Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Ρ Π°ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ: Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ, ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π½ΡΡΠ², ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ°
This paper addresses cases of social situations that can be identified as sexual harassment in Russian healthcare. Drawing on the intersectional approach and some prerequisites of the sociology of professions, the article reveals several dimensions of power asymmetry in the context of medical professions and organizations, and analyzes their synergistic effects. In particular, it examines the symbolic inequalities of different medical professions, emphasizing their gendered character. The paper draws on mixed-method data consisting of 20 in-depth semi-structured interviews with nursing staff and 23 interviews with those medical professionals who agreed to share their experiences of sexual harassment. Additionally, results of an online survey (560 responses) on workplace interactions is drawn upon in the analysis. Focusing on the emotional experiences of the research participants, the paper demonstrates that some health professionals find themselves in a vulnerable position on multiple grounds: gender, specialization, position in the professional hierarchy, age (generation), and others. Some local features of Russian healthcare and specific organizational cultures further amplify the effects of structural inequalities, reproducing additional - and mostly informal - dimensions of power. Under such conditions, the experience of sexual harassment is most often silenced both in the organizational context and in the public, yet remains emotionally sensitive for the victims. The article analyzes effects such as the privatization of personal experience, which renders the issue of sexual harassment in medicine methodologically and epistemologically uninvestigable, and in practice - unsolvable
Multiple Vulnerabilities in Medical Settings: Invisible Suffering of Doctors
While there is a substantive amount of literature on vulnerability of different kinds of patients in different settings, medical professionals are usually considered as the ones who possess power and gain a privileged position. In this paper, we aim to demonstrate that in a certain context physicians—a social group which is usually referred to as “powerful”—consider themselves vulnerable, and this positioning may influence patients in turn. This perspective highlights the complexity of interactions within medical organizations and contributes to the studies of sensitive topics and vulnerable groups. We conceptualize vulnerability of doctors and discuss what can be problematic in powerful doctors’ position. We describe some features of the post-Soviet context of Russian healthcare system and maternity care, both of which can be conceptualized as a hybrid of legacy of Soviet paternalism and new neoliberal reforms, managerialism and marketization. Empirical research is based on the ethnographic evidence from the study of a Russian perinatal center. In this article, we explore specific “existential” and “moral” vulnerabilities of medical professionals who routinely have to cope with multiple challenges, such as complicated clinical tasks, rigid control of different state bodies and emotional responses of suffering patients. We argue that there is a bond between the vulnerability of doctors and that of patients, whose position becomes more problematic as professionals become more vulnerable. At the end, we discuss methodological and theoretical implications of our research
Succeeding in Foreign Language Study: Teachers and Students Standpoints
The paper considers views of teachers and international students on effectiveness of language acquisition. The study represents the results of original experiment conducted among international students from the various institutes of Kazan Federal University. Students were requested to determine the priority of the following factors and explain the choice: a role of motivating anxiety for learning foreign language; a role of language abilities and talents of international student; a role of professional and personal characteristics of foreign language teacher; a role of methods, techniques and technologies of teaching; importance of studying within environment of a target language. Views of experts and international students on priority of impact of various factors of the foreign language teaching differed. The only factor where the opinions of teachers and students were the same, turned out to be the role of motivation. However, comparative analysis of factors of effectiveness in studying from the point of view of different and in the same time unified subjects of this process shows that the whole complex of factors must be taken into account. The results of the conducted study inevitably prove the necessity of considering the studentsβ opinion on the process of teaching, and corresponding correction of teachersβ activities