3 research outputs found

    Social contexts and moderators of the relationship between parental separation and negative youth outcomes

    Get PDF
    This dissertation examines how characteristics of the various social contexts in which youth live shape their response to parental separation and divorce. Specifically, I explore how the percent of school peers who live in alternative families, the percent of school peers who are conservatively Protestant, and the family and sibling environments modify the influence of a parental separation on youth delinquency and depression. Drawing on social ecological theories, the life course perspective, and theories of social norms, I formulate hypotheses about the modifying roles of these three contexts. Analyses using three waves of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) show that higher percentages of school peers who live in alternative families are associated with lower delinquency rates for those who experience a parental separation only for those who live in higher socioeconomic status areas. Higher percentages of conservative Protestants in an adolescent’s school are associated with higher levels of delinquency and depression for those who experience a parental separation, regardless of socioeconomic status. Higher levels of both family and sibling closeness pre-separation are associated with increased negative outcomes for those who experience a parental separation. Altogether, these findings suggest that the normative, religious, and family contexts in which youth live have the potential to limit or exacerbate possible negative effects or parental separation. Better understanding the role of social context in shaping youth response to parental separation advances the sociological study of youth and families, and informs program and policymakers as to how interventions in the contexts in which youth live can benefit their wellbeing

    NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES: a data set on carnivore distribution in the Neotropics

    No full text
    Mammalian carnivores are considered a key group in maintaining ecological health and can indicate potential ecological integrity in landscapes where they occur. Carnivores also hold high conservation value and their habitat requirements can guide management and conservation plans. The order Carnivora has 84 species from 8 families in the Neotropical region: Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Otariidae; Phocidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae. Herein, we include published and unpublished data on native terrestrial Neotropical carnivores (Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae). NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES is a publicly available data set that includes 99,605 data entries from 35,511 unique georeferenced coordinates. Detection/non-detection and quantitative data were obtained from 1818 to 2018 by researchers, governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and private consultants. Data were collected using several methods including camera trapping, museum collections, roadkill, line transect, and opportunistic records. Literature (peer-reviewed and grey literature) from Portuguese, Spanish and English were incorporated in this compilation. Most of the data set consists of detection data entries (n = 79,343; 79.7%) but also includes non-detection data (n = 20,262; 20.3%). Of those, 43.3% also include count data (n = 43,151). The information available in NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES will contribute to macroecological, ecological, and conservation questions in multiple spatio-temporal perspectives. As carnivores play key roles in trophic interactions, a better understanding of their distribution and habitat requirements are essential to establish conservation management plans and safeguard the future ecological health of Neotropical ecosystems. Our data paper, combined with other large-scale data sets, has great potential to clarify species distribution and related ecological processes within the Neotropics. There are no copyright restrictions and no restriction for using data from this data paper, as long as the data paper is cited as the source of the information used. We also request that users inform us of how they intend to use the data
    corecore