How future surgery will benefit from SARS-COV-2-related measures: a SPIGC survey conveying the perspective of Italian surgeons

COVID-19 negatively affected surgical activity, but the potential benefits resulting from adopted measures remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in surgical activity and potential benefit from COVID-19 measures in perspective of Italian surgeons on behalf of SPIGC. A nationwide online survey on surgical practice before, during, and after COVID-19 pandemic was conducted in March-April 2022 (NCT:05323851). Effects of COVID-19 hospital-related measures on surgical patients' management and personal professional development across surgical specialties were explored. Data on demographics, pre-operative/peri-operative/post-operative management, and professional development were collected. Outcomes were matched with the corresponding volume. Four hundred and seventy-three respondents were included in final analysis across 14 surgical specialties. Since SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, application of telematic consultations (4.1% vs. 21.6%; p < 0.0001) and diagnostic evaluations (16.4% vs. 42.2%; p < 0.0001) increased. Elective surgical activities significantly reduced and surgeons opted more frequently for conservative management with a possible indication for elective (26.3% vs. 35.7%; p < 0.0001) or urgent (20.4% vs. 38.5%; p < 0.0001) surgery. All new COVID-related measures are perceived to be maintained in the future. Surgeons' personal education online increased from 12.6% (pre-COVID) to 86.6% (post-COVID; p < 0.0001). Online educational activities are considered a beneficial effect from COVID pandemic (56.4%). COVID-19 had a great impact on surgical specialties, with significant reduction of operation volume. However, some forced changes turned out to be benefits. Isolation measures pushed the use of telemedicine and telemetric devices for outpatient practice and favored communication for educational purposes and surgeon-patient/family communication. From the Italian surgeons' perspective, COVID-related measures will continue to influence future surgical clinical practice

Speckle-tracking global longitudinal strain as an early predictor of cardiotoxicity in breast carcinoma

Purpose: Recent development in anticancer therapies for breast carcinoma allowed an improvement in patients\u2019 survival, notwithstanding a parallel increase of cardiovascular morbidity. Cardiotoxicity of anticancer therapies represents a relevant problem due to its insidious onset and potentially irreversible cardiac damage. The aim of the present study was to test whether 2D speckle tracking analysis can help in predicting overt systolic dysfunction. Methods: A \u201creal world\u201d cohort of 69 patients with breast carcinoma undergoing adjuvant and/or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was tested 2D-speckle tracking analysis before the beginning of chemotherapy and every 3 months for 1 year. Clinical data, 12-lead ECGs, and lab tests were collected according to the same visit protocol. Results: Over 1-year follow-up, 19 patients (27 %) developed cardiac dysfunction according to the CREC criteria, with an average onset time from enrolment of 6.8 months. A global longitudinal strain (GLS) threshold 65 1216 % at 3 months from chemotherapy was able to predict subsequent systolic dysfunction development with high sensitivity (80 %) and specificity (90 %) and a negative predictive value of 92 %. After the introduction of cardioprotective drugs, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) progressively recovered, while alterations of GLS persisted at 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: Strain imaging with 2D speckle tracking allows the identification of patients at low-risk for chemotherapy-related systolic dysfunction and can help optimizing resources allocations and improving follow-up quality. GLS can also provide a more accurate prognostic index of resolved systolic dysfunction when compared to standard LVEF