67 research outputs found

    Bettelverbote: einige rechtsvergleichende Überlegungen zur Grundrechtskonformität

    Full text link

    Human rights strategies in an age of counter-terrorism

    Full text link

    Racial and Ethnic Profiling

    Full text link

    Völkerrechtliche Grenzen des racial profiling

    Full text link

    Comparative Conclusion

    Full text link

    Immigration law enforcement after 9/11 and human rights

    Full text link

    Das Klima als globales öffentliches Gut

    Full text link

    Wegweisungen und Rayonverbote - ein Überblick

    Full text link

    A Duty to Give Reasons in the Security Council: Making Voting Transparent

    Get PDF
    This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Brill via https://doi.org/ 10.2139/ssrn.2710027In recent years, the U.N. Security Council has repeatedly come under criticism for its inaction in the face of serious violations of international law. As a means to prevent further deadlocks, this article advocates the introduction of a duty to explain votes cast in the Council. In certain situations, such a duty to give reasons already exists today, although it is not implemented. We propose to extend this duty to all votes in the Security Council and to codify it in its Provisional Rules of Procedure. A comprehensive duty to give reasons has three major virtues: it increases the quality of Council decisions, it enhances legal certainty, and it improves the accountability of the Council and of its members. As opposed to structural reforms, our proposal does not necessitate amending the U.N. Charter and thus does not depend on the consent of the Council’s permanent members
    corecore