The impact of COVID-19 on myocardial infarctions, strokes and out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrests: an observational retrospective study on time-sensitive disorders in the Friuli Venezia Giulia region (Italy)

The COVID-19 global pandemic has changed considerably the way time-sensitive disorders are treated. Home isolation, people's fear of contracting the virus and hospital reorganisation have led to a significant decrease in contacts between citizens and the healthcare system, with an expected decrease in calls to the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) of the Friuli-Venezia Giulia (FVG) region. However, mortality in clinical emergencies like acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), stroke and out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OHCA) remained high. An observational retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out in FVG, taking into account the period between March 1, 2020, and May 31, 2020, the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and comparing it with the same period in 2019. The flow of calls to the EMS was analysed and COVID-19 impact on time-sensitive disorders (STEMIs, ischemic strokes and OHCPAs) was measured in terms of hospitalisation, treatment and mortality. Despite a -8.01% decrease (p value ˂0.001) in emergency response, a 10.89% increase in calls to the EMS was observed. A lower number of advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitations (CPR) (75.8 vs 45.2%, p=0.000021 in April) and ROSC (39.1 vs 11.6%, p=0.0001 in April) was remarked, and survival rate dropped from 8.5 to 5%. There were less strokes (-27.5%, p value=0.002) despite a more severe onset of symptoms at hospitalisation with NHISS˃10 in 38.47% of cases. Acute myocardial infarctions decreased as well (-20%, p value=0.05), but statistical significances were not determined in the variables considered and in mortality. Despite a lower number of emergency responses, the number of calls to the EMS was considerably higher. The number of cardiac arrests treated with advanced CPR (ALS) was lower, but mortality was higher. The number of strokes decreased as well, but at the time of hospitalisation the clinical picture of the patient was more severe, thus affecting the outcome when the patient was discharged. Finally, STEMI patients decreased; however, no critical issues were observed in the variables taken into account, neither in terms of response times nor in terms of treatment times

Historical Terminology, Classifications, and Present Definition of DCM.

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is defined by the presence of left ventricular (LV) dilation and systolic dysfunction in the absence of abnormal loading conditions or coronary artery disease sufficient to cause the LV systolic impairment. In the last years, advances in pathophysiology, pathology, biomarkers, genetics and molecular medicine, echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance have allowed an evolution from an etiological to a morphological and then to a morphofunctional classification of the disease. Familial forms account for the 40% of cases, and thanks to the recent discoveries in the genetic field, clinicians have the opportunity but also the responsibility to provide an etiological diagnosis, stratify the risk, and treat patients with the best strategy available. Nowadays the etiologic characterization has dramatically improved so that it is possible to understand the etiologic basis of many so-called idiopathic heart muscle disease. A step toward a comprehensive DCM classification and an attempt to reconcile clinic with genetic in the complexity of the disease is genotype-phenotype correlation, with its prognostic implication in clinical practice. In this chapter will be discussed the historical evolution of DCM classification, and an overview of the main issues discussed in the next sections will be given