Improvised intracranial pressure monitoring devices for traumatic brain injury management in a low-income environment: A single-centre randomised study demonstrating feasibility

Background: The high cost and non-availability of standard ICP monitoring devices limit their use in low- and middle-income countries like Nigeria. This study aims to demonstrate the use of an improvised intraventricular ICP monitoring device as a feasible alternative. Research question: Are improvised ICP Monitoring devices feasible and effective in resource-constrained settings? Materials and methods: The study was a prospective single-institution investigation involving 54 adult patients that presented with severe TBI (GCS of 3–8) within 72 ​h of injury and required operative intervention. All patients underwent craniotomy or primary decompressive craniectomy (DC) to evacuate traumatic mass lesions. 14-day in-hospital mortality was used as a primary endpoint of the study. 25 patients had ICP monitoring postoperatively using the improvised device. Results: The modified ICP device was replicated using a feeding tube and a manometer with 0.9% saline as a coupling agent. Based on hourly ICP recording (up to 72 ​h), patients were observed as having high ICP (>27 ​cm H2O) and normal ICP (27 ​cm H2O). In the ICP-monitored group, raised ICP was detected more than in the clinically assessed group (84% vs 12% p= <0.001). Discussion and conclusion: There was a 3-time higher mortality rate among the non-ICP monitored participants (31%) compared to the ICP-monitored participants (12%), although this did not reach statistical significance due to the small sample size. This preliminary study has shown that this modified ICP monitoring system is a relatively feasible alternative for diagnosing and treating elevated ICP in severe TBI in resource-constrained environments

The World Neurosurgery Global Champions Program: First-Year Experience of a Model Initiative for Reducing Disparities in Global Neurosurgical Literature.

OBJECTIVE: Most surgical journals are published in English, representing a challenge for researchers from non-Anglophone countries. We describe the implementation, workflow, outcomes, and lessons learned from the WORLD NEUROSURGERY Global Champions Program (GCP), a novel journal-specific English language editing program for articles rejected because of poor English grammar or usage. METHODS: The GCP was advertised via the journal website and social media. Applicants were selected to be a reviewer for the GCP if they demonstrated English proficiency on writing samples supplied in their application. The demographics of GCP members and characteristics and outcomes of articles edited by the GCP during its first year were reviewed. Surveys of GCP members and authors who used the service were conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-one individuals became part of the GCP, representing 8 countries and 16 languages apart from English. A total of 380 manuscripts were peer reviewed by the editor-in-chief, who determined these manuscripts to have potentially worthwhile content but needed to be rejected due to poor language. The authors of these manuscripts were informed of the existence of this language assistance program. Forty-nine articles (12.9%) were edited by the GCP in 41.6 ± 22.8 days. Of 40 articles resubmitted to WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 24 (60.0%) were accepted. GCP members and authors understood the purpose and workflow of the program and recognized improvements in article quality and the probability of acceptance through their participation. CONCLUSIONS: The WORLD NEUROSURGERY Global Champions Program mitigated a critical barrier to publication in an English language journal for authors from non-Anglophone countries. This program promotes research equity by providing a free, largely medical student and trainee operated, English language editing service. This model or a similar service can be replicated by other journals