14 research outputs found

    Clinical Efficacy and Toxicity of Anti-EGFR Therapy in Common Cancers

    Get PDF
    Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a cell surface molecule and member of the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases. Its activation leads to proliferation, antiapoptosis, and metastatic spread, making inhibition of this pathway a compelling target. In recent years, an increasing number of clinical trials in the management of solid malignancies have become available indicating the clinical efficacy of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and oral small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This review addresses frequently used EGFR inhibitors, summarizes clinical efficacy data of these new therapeutic agents, and discusses their associated toxicity and management

    Bladder Cancer: Review Questions

    No full text
    Choose the single best answer for each question. 1. All of the following regarding the epidemiology of bladder cancer in the United States are true EX-CEPT (A) Bladder cancer is the most common malignancy affecting the urinary tract (B) Non-Hispanic whites are at highest risk (C) Smoking is the most important risk factor (D) There is no gender preference (E) Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) is the most common type 2. A 60-year-old man with newly diagnosed high-grade superficial TCC of the bladder presents for a second opinion. One week ago, the patient underwent transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) with multiple random biopsies, which revealed superficial TCC associated with several areas of carcinoma in situ, invasion into lamina propia but not into the muscle, and vascular invasion. He was told by another physician that his only option is a radical cystectomy. He would like to preserve his bladder but is worried about the possible spread of the cancer. What should be recommended to this patient? (A) Combined chemoradiotherapy (B) Radical cystectom

    Rituximab Induced Interstitial Lung Disease.

    No full text

    Phase II trial of second-line erlotinib and digoxin for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

    No full text
    Fadi Kayali, Muhamad A Janjua, Damian A Laber, Donald Miller, Goetz H KloeckerUniversity of Louisville, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, KY, USABackground: In vitro digoxin sensitizes cancer cells to the induction of apoptosis by chemotherapy. Inhibition of the Na/K-ATPase enzyme by ouabain disturbs the intracellular ion composition of cancer cells, altering cellular homeostasis. This suggests that inhibition of the Na/K pump results in cellular sensitization of malignant but not benign cells to the induction of apoptosis. Epidemiologic studies have also shown beneficial effects of digitalis in breast cancer incidence. At ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology) 2007 our group presented a Phase II study showing encouraging results by adding digoxin to biochemotherapy for melanoma. Erlotinib is one of the standard second-line treatments for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with a response rate (RR) of 10%. This study's hypothesis was that adding digoxin to erlotinib will improve the RR and time to progression (TTP) in NSCLC.Methods: Patients with progressive disease (PD) after chemotherapy were enrolled if they had an ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) score from 0 to 2 and good organ function. Daily erlotinib 150 mg and digoxin 0.25 mg were taken by mouth. The digoxin dose was adjusted to keep levels between 1 and 2 ng/mL. Computed tomography scans were done every 6 weeks. Treatment continued until PD or significant toxicity occurred.Results: Patient accrual lasted from March 2006 until August 2008 and was stopped early at the time of interim analysis. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled, and 24 who completed at least 6 weeks of therapy are presented here. All patients had unresectable NSCLC stage III/IV at diagnosis. Median age was 61 (34–78), 14 were female, 17 had prior radiation (not involving the target lesions), 23 had one prior chemotherapy, and one subject had two. Only one patient was a never-smoker. Histologies were 50% adenocarcinoma, 30% squamous, and 20% unspecified. One patient had a partial response, nine had stable disease, and 14 had progressive disease. The median TTP was 61 days (9–366) and median survival 157 days (9–844). Side effects were similar to erlotinib single agent with no treatment-related mortality. There were no unexpected or increased adverse events related to digoxin.Conclusions: Digoxin did not increase the response rate of erlotinib in the treatment of progressive NSCLC. The TTP and survival seen in this study were similar to the published results with erlotinib alone. This combination does not warrant further clinical studies in NSCLC.Keywords: metastatic lung cancer treatment, digitalis, erlotinib&nbsp

    Indolent Course of Thymic Carcinoid

    No full text

    Nivolumab as salvage treatment in a patient with HIV-related relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and liver failure with encephalopathy

    No full text
    Abstract Background We report the first case to our knowledge of a patient with relapsed/refractory classical hodgkin lymphoma and liver failure with encephalopathy along with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome infection, successfully treated with nivolumab without major side effects and encouraging prolonged disease control. Case presentation In December 2015, at the time of the patient’s progression from his Hodgkin lymphoma after fourth line treatment, he developed persistent fevers, abdominal distension, jaundice and worsening of his liver function tests. Magnetic resonance imaging of abdomen/pelvis demonstrated hepatomegaly with innumerable new liver lesions, splenomegaly with multiple splenic nodules and several new mediastinal, intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. In accordance with the patient’s wishes before admission, and after agreement with the family, nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) was given. Of note, antiretroviral therapy was on hold due to liver function tests, his viral load was undectable and cluster of differentiation 4 counts were 103/uL at the time of nivolumab administration. One week after the first dose of nivolumab both his hepatic encephalopathy and constitutional symptoms started to improve, and after 2 doses, (January 2016) his LFTs were almost back to normal. After 5 months of nivolumab treatment (10 doses), restaging (computerized tomography scans of neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis) done on May 2016 showed resolution of hepatosplenomegaly with two residual small hepatic lesions, heterogeneous spleen with no splenic lesions, and stable non-enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes without intraabdominal lymphadenopathy; consistent with partial response. Conclusions We report a case of a patient with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome -related relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and acute liver failure with encephalopathy successfully treated with nivolumab after failing all standard therapeutic options. Unlike classic cytotoxic chemotherapy, which relies on preserved organ function to ameliorate potential severe side effects (i.e. myelosuppression), elimination of monoclonal antibodies is fairly independent of baseline renal and hepatic function since they are usually metabolized by circulating phagocytes and/or by their target antigen-expressing cell

    Insights into the Impact of Hesitancy on Cancer Care and COVID-19

    No full text
    World Health Organization findings indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected cancer diagnosis and management. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the optimal management of outpatient appointments, scheduled treatments, and hospitalizations for cancer patients because of hesitancy among patients and health-care providers. Travel restrictions and other factors likely affected medical, surgical, and radiation treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cancer patients were more likely to be affected by severe illness and complications if they contracted COVID-19. A compromised immune system and comorbidities in cancer patients may have contributed to this increased risk. Hesitancy or reluctance to receive appropriate therapy or vaccination advice might have played a major role for cancer patients, resulting in health-care deficits. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on screening, entry into clinical trials, and hesitancy among patients and health-care professionals, limiting adjuvant and metastatic cancer treatment
    corecore