Leucaena in Northern Australia: A Forage Tree Legume Success Story

Leucaena leucocephala (leucaena) is a long-lived, perennial forage tree legume of very high nutritive value for ruminant production. In northern Australia, leucaena is direct seeded into hedgerows 5-10m apart, with grass species such as buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) planted in the inter-row to form a highly productive and sustainable grass-legume pasture that cattle graze directly. It generally is grown on deep, fertile soils in sub-humid environments with average rainfall of 600-800mm/year. Steer gains of 275-300kg/head per year are achieved, with short-term daily gains over the main growing season \u3e 1kg/head. Being very deep-rooted, leucaena exploits moisture beyond the reach of grasses and remains productive well into the dry season. Once established, leucaena-grass pastures remain productive for \u3e 40 years

Breeding a Psyllid-Resistant Interspecific Hybrid \u3cem\u3eLeucaena\u3c/em\u3e for Beef Cattle Production in Northern Australia

Production of the valuable fodder tree legume Leucaena leucocephala (leucaena) is limited to the subhumid (600-800 mm annual rainfall) areas of northern Australia by the psyllid insect pest Heteropsylla cubana. Defoliation caused by severe psyllid infestations can suppress forage yields of commercial leucaena varieties by 50-80%. Susceptibility to psyllid damage is a major impediment to grazier adoption of leucaena pastures in the more humid tropical areas of Australia. A comprehensive international agronomic evaluation of the entire Leucaena genus (Mullen et al., 2003) revealed that the artificial interspecific F1 hybrid of L. pallida x L. leucocephala ssp. glabrata (called KX2) had a high degree of psyllid resistance, excellent vigour and broad environmental adaptation. The KX2 F1 hybrid also had superior forage quality compared to other psylli-resistant taxa, such as L. pallida, L. trichandra and L. diversifolia. Commercial utilization of the KX2 F1 hybrid by Australian graziers has been prevented by a lack of planting material. To date, seed production of the F1 hybrid has only been possible by laborious hand pollination. The KX2 F1 hybrid has been successfully vegetatively propagated for smallholders in SE Asia, however cloned cuttings are expensive to produce and are not suited to broad acre leucaena planting in Australia. A recurrent selection breeding program was initiated to produce a genetically stable, advanced generation KX2 hybrid that breeds true-to-type and is suitable for commercial release. We anticipate that 4 cycles of selection will be required to achieve this objective. This paper reports the agronomic evaluation of the KX2 F2 generation

Detection of Toxicity in Ruminants Consuming Leucaena (\u3cem\u3eLeucaena leucocephala\u3c/em\u3e) Using a Urine Colorimetric Test

Leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala), a productive leguminous shrub for feeding ruminant livestock, contains the toxic amino acid, mimosine which post- ingestion is converted to 3,4-DHP and 2,3-DHP, isomers of dihydroxy-pyridone. While DHP generally does not exhibit acute toxic symptoms, it has been suggested that it is an appetite suppressant that reduces animal live weight gain (Jones 1994). With no observable symptoms, subclinical toxicity is difficult to detect (Phaikaew et al. 2012). In 1982 the DHP-degrading rumen bacterium named Synergistes jonesii was introduced into Australia as a potential solution to DHP toxicity as it spreads easily throughout cattle herds grazing leucaena (Jones 1994). However, toxicity events reported since the 2003 drought suggest that the toxicity status of herds, previously understood as being protected, may have changed. This may be the result of loss of effective S. jonesii bacteria from the rumen. Widespread subclinical leucaena toxicity has since been confirmed representing a significant economic threat to the beef industry (Dalzell et al. 2012). At present the testing for toxicity requires a sophisticated chemical analysis of urine samples using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Producers, however, require a robust and reliable means to routinely test for toxicity in their herds. A colorimetric urine test protocol is available based on the colour reaction of mimosine and DHP with FeCl3 solution (Jones 1997). When this simpler colorimetric test has been used under a wide range of conditions false negatives have been reported. The aim of this study was to improve the reliability of the FeCL3 urine colour test

Rates of Urinary Toxin Excretion in Unprotected Steers Fed \u3cem\u3eLeucaena leucocephala\u3c/em\u3e

Leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) is a productive, nutritious, leguminous forage tree with high capacity for ruminant live weight gain. The plant does however contain the non-protein amino acid mimosine which is degraded within the rumen to 3-hydroxy-4(1H)-pyridone (3,4-DHP) with potential to cause adverse effects on animal health and production. Stock can be protected via rumen inoculation with the bacterium Synergistes jonesii, which is capable of degrading the toxin. However surveys have demonstrated sub-clinical toxicity is persisting in Queensland herds (Dalzell et al. 2012). Currently, testing for toxicity involves analysis of urine samples using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). A colorimetric urine test protocol has also been developed with the aim of providing a robust and reliable means for routinely testing herds (Graham et al. 2013). A significant problem affecting interpretation of the results from either method is the high variation in the concentrations of toxins excreted among animals on similar diets and by individual animals over time (Dalzell et al. 2012). Factors such as feed intake, water consumption, urine volume, as well as timing of sampling may be the cause of this variation. This research investigated the effect of sample timing by measuring the time taken for mimosine and its breakdown products, to present in the urine following the introduction of leucaena to the ration of cattle naïve to the plant

Diurnal Urinary Excretion of DHP in Steers Fed \u3cem\u3eLeucaena leucocephala\u3c/em\u3e

Leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) contains the toxin mimosine which is quickly degraded by rumen microorganisms to isomers of dihydroxypyridine (DHP). DHP is detrimental to animal production, causing reduced thyroid hormones, reduced weight gain, goiter and severe deficiencies in essential minerals (Tsai and Ling 1971; Hammond 1995). There are several methods of testing for exposure to DHP toxicity but the simplest is the colorimetric urine spot test (Graham et al. 2013). Several researchers have noted high variability in the excretion of DHP among animals on similar leucaena diets (Dalzell et al. 2012; Phaikaew et al. 2012) and even in the same animal over sequential samplings (O\u27Reagain and Shelton 2013). They noted that it was possible to obtain samples with very low DHP in unprotected animals on high leucaena diets, leading to the false conclusion that the animal was successfully degrading DHP in the rumen. This study examined the extent and possible causes of variation of DHP concentration in spot urine samples taken over a 6-week period, including an intensive sampling over a 24 hour period

Toxicity in Beef Cattle Grazing \u3cem\u3eLeucaena leucocephala\u3c/em\u3e in Queensland, Australia

Improved pastures based on the leguminous shrub Leucaena leucocephala (leucaena) are the most productive, profitable and sustainable for beef cattle production in northern Australia. Leucaena forage contains the toxic, non-protein amino acid mimosine, which is rapidly converted to 3-hydroxy-4(1H)-pyridone (DHP) upon ingestion by grazing cattle. This is a potent goitrogen and appetite suppressant. Animals suffering severe DHP toxicity exhibit distinctive symptoms (e.g. hair loss, excessive salivation, goitre and weight loss), while subclinical DHP toxicity can suppress live weight gain by 30-50% without producing any obvious symptoms. Prior to the discovery and introduction of the DHP-degrading rumen bacteria Synergistes jonesii into Australia in 1982, DHP toxicity severely limited animal performance from leucaena pastures and was a major impediment to adoption. Initial rumen inoculation of cattle in Australia with S. jonesii successfully protected them against DHP toxicity and the bacterium appeared to be easily and rapidly transmitted between grazing animals. Consequently many scientists and graziers believed that a single inoculation of a herd with S. jonesii, combined with simple ongoing herd management, was sufficient to overcome the problem of DHP toxicity. However, during the 2003 drought there were several reports of severe leucaena toxicity (including animal deaths) in cattle grazing leucaena in Queensland. Toxicity was evident even in herds that had followed recommended control measures. Preliminary results are presented of a study, designed to ascertain the prevalence and possible causes of leucaena toxicity in Queensland cattle herds. Meat and Livestock Australia Limited funded this research (NBP.340)

The Growth Response of Tropical and Sub-Tropical Forage Species to Increasing Salinity

There is currently a growing coal seam gas (CSG) industry in Queensland, Australia. The industry requires beneficial-use strategies to consume the significant volumes of water released during CSG extraction. Irrigation of tropical and sub-tropical forage species for beef production is one option, however coal seam (CS) water is of varying quality due to moderate to high salinity and alkalinity. The application of chemically amended CS water over time could potentially increase soil salinity, which is known to reduce plant biomass production. While there were studies of salinity tolerance of many tropical and sub-tropical forage species 30 years ago, there is a need to examine the tolerance of more recently released species and cultivars which are suitable for planting in the Queensland CSG area

The Efficacy of \u3cem\u3ein vitro Synergistes jonesii\u3c/em\u3e Inoculum in Preventing DHP Toxicity in Steers Fed Leucaena-Grass Diets

Leucaena leucocephala (leucaena) is a valuable forage tree legume for tropical animal production that contains the toxin mimosine. The breakdown products of mimosine in ruminants (3,4-DHP and 2,3-DHP) can adversely affect their health and limit weight gains (Jones and Hegarty 1984). The rumen bacterium Synergistes jonesii, introduced into Australia in 1983 was shown to completely and rapidly degrade these toxins to safe levels (Jones and Megarrity 1986). Since 1996, an in vitro produced inoculum has been made commercially available to Australian graziers (Klieve et al. 2002). Accordingly, the issue of leucaena toxicity in Australia was thought to be resolved. However, extensive testing in 2004 found that up to 50% of Queensland cattle herds consuming leucaena were excreting high levels of urinary DHP suggesting sub-clinical toxicity remained an issue for graziers (Dalzell et al. 2012). Some of these herds had previously been inoculated with in vitro S. jonesii suggesting the inoculum may not be able to either persist within a herd, or remain effective in degrading DHP. The aim of this study was to assess the capability of the in vitro S. jonesii inoculum to efficiently break down DHP in a controlled feeding trial environment

The Effect of Tree Densities on the Biomass of \u3cem\u3eLeucaena leucocephala\u3c/em\u3e and \u3cem\u3eChloris gayana\u3c/em\u3e Using a Nelder Fan Design

Leucaena leucocephala-grass pastures are widely used for ruminant feeding in tropical and subtropical regions. In Australia, over 200,000 ha of leucaena grass pasture have been planted with more plantings expected as it is recognized as the most productive, profitable and sustainable feeding system (Shelton and Dalzell, 2007). Planting densities and planting configurations for the leucaena component vary, ranging from single or double leucaena hedgerows 3 to 12 m apart (Radrizzani et al., 2010). There is little information about how tree/grass planting configurations and resulting inter- and intraspecific competition affect above and below-ground interactions. We hypothesise that individual leucaena tree biomass will be inversely related to leucaena tree density, with greatest competition at low density, while medium to high leucaena densities will reduce grass biomass production

Selection of Psyllid-Resistant Forage Varieties from an Inter-Specific Breeding Program of \u3cem\u3eLeucaena leucocephala\u3c/em\u3e with \u3cem\u3eL. pallida\u3c/em\u3e

Leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) pastures for beef cattle production are productive and sustainable; however, susceptibility to the psyllid insect (Heteropsylla cubana) has limited expansion of current commercial cultivars into more humid areas (\u3e 800 mm/yr) (Shelton and Dalzell 2007). Psyllids can also cause intermittent damage in lower rainfall regions during humid periods. The psyllid, which arrived in Australia in 1986, is a leaf-sucking insect specific to the Leucaena genus, feeding on the growing tips of susceptible cultivars (Bray 1994). Psyllid damage can reduce production by as much as 50-70% in humid regions and 20-50% in subhumid environments (Bray 1994; Mullen and Shelton 2003). Work on psyllid resistance in the Leucaena genus through the 1990s showed that several Leucaena species, including the tetraploid L. pallida, had good levels of resistance (Mullen et al. 2003). A breeding program to develop psyllid-resistant varieties began in 2002 at The University of Queensland (UQ) based on the F1 inter-specific hybrids between L. leucocephala and L. pallida (known as ‘KX2’), developed at the University of Hawaii (Brewbaker 2008). Between 2002 and 2005, UQ initiated a program of recurrent selection in an attempt to produce stable outcrossed KX2-derived lines but inbreeding depression for yield and poor forage quality led to a change in the breeding strategy, and a backcrossing program was implemented between 2005 and 2008. Two cycles of backcrossing to elite L. leucocephala ssp. glabrata material were completed followed by 2 cycles of progeny testing and selection for self-compatibility to achieve stability and uniformity (2009 - 2012). Forty elite psyllid-resistant lines were then evaluated to identify the most suitable lines for release to industry. This paper describes the results of these trials