40,954 research outputs found

    The Search for Supersymmetry at the Tevatron Collider

    Full text link
    We review the status of searches for Supersymmetry at the Tevatron Collider. After discussing the theoretical aspects relevant to the production and decay of supersymmetric particles at the Tevatron, we present the current results for Runs Ia and Ib as of the summer of 1997. To appear in the book "Perspectives in Supersymmetry", edited by G.L. Kane, World Scientific.Comment: 84 pages with 31 figures imbedded using psfig.tex. Uses sprocl.st

    Phase Separation, Competition, and Volume Fraction Control in NaFe1x_{1-x}Cox_xAs

    Full text link
    We report a detailed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) study by combined 23^{23}Na and 75^{75}As measurements over a broad range of doping to map the phase diagram of NaFe1x_{1-x}Cox_xAs. In the underdoped regime (xx \le 0.017), we find a magnetic phase with robust antiferromagnetic (AFM) order, which we denote the {\it s}-AFM phase, cohabiting with a phase of weak and possibly proximity-induced AFM order ({\it w}-AFM) whose volume fraction V8V \simeq 8\% is approximately constant. Near optimal doping, at x=0.0175x = 0.0175, we observe a phase separation between static antiferromagnetism related to the {\it s}-AFM phase and a paramagnetic (PM) phase related to {\it w}-AFM. The volume fraction of AFM phase increases upon cooling, but both the N{\'e}el temperature and the volume fraction can be suppressed systematically by applying a cc-axis magnetic field. On cooling below TcT_c, superconductivity occupies the PM region and its volume fraction grows at the expense of the AFM phase, demonstrating a phase separation of the two types of order based on volume exclusion. At higher dopings, static antiferromagnetism and even critical AFM fluctuations are completely suppressed by superconductivity. Thus the phase diagram we establish contains two distinct types of phase separation and reflects a strong competition between AFM and superconducting phases both in real space and in momentum space. We suggest that both this strict mutual exclusion and the robustness of superconductivity against magnetism are consequences of the extreme two-dimensionality of NaFeAs.Comment: 12 pages, 6 figure

    M(atrix) Theory: Matrix Quantum Mechanics as a Fundamental Theory

    Get PDF
    A self-contained review is given of the matrix model of M-theory. The introductory part of the review is intended to be accessible to the general reader. M-theory is an eleven-dimensional quantum theory of gravity which is believed to underlie all superstring theories. This is the only candidate at present for a theory of fundamental physics which reconciles gravity and quantum field theory in a potentially realistic fashion. Evidence for the existence of M-theory is still only circumstantial---no complete background-independent formulation of the theory yet exists. Matrix theory was first developed as a regularized theory of a supersymmetric quantum membrane. More recently, the theory appeared in a different guise as the discrete light-cone quantization of M-theory in flat space. These two approaches to matrix theory are described in detail and compared. It is shown that matrix theory is a well-defined quantum theory which reduces to a supersymmetric theory of gravity at low energies. Although the fundamental degrees of freedom of matrix theory are essentially pointlike, it is shown that higher-dimensional fluctuating objects (branes) arise through the nonabelian structure of the matrix degrees of freedom. The problem of formulating matrix theory in a general space-time background is discussed, and the connections between matrix theory and other related models are reviewed.Comment: 56 pages, 3 figures, LaTeX, revtex style; v2: references adde
    corecore