Radiologic evaluation of the kidney transplant donor and recipient

The kidney is the most common solid organ transplant globally and rates continue to climb, driven by the increasing prevalence of end stage renal disease (ESRD). Compounded by advancements in surgical techniques and immunosuppression leading to longer graft survival, radiologists evermore commonly evaluate kidney transplant patients and candidates, underscoring their role along the transplant process. Multiphase computed tomography (CT) with multiplanar and 3D reformatting is the primary method for evaluating renal donor candidates, detailing renal size, vascular/collecting system anatomy, and identifying significant pathologies such as renal vascular diseases and nephrolithiasis. Ultrasound is the preferred initial postoperative imaging modality for graft evaluation due to its low cost, accessibility, noninvasiveness, and lack of radiation. CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be useful adjunctive imaging techniques in diagnosing transplant pathology when ultrasound alone is not diagnostic. Kidney transplant complications are categorized by an approximate timeline framework, aiding in differential diagnosis based on onset, duration, and severity and include perinephric fluid collections, graft compression, iatrogenic injuries, vascular compromise, graft rejection, and neoplastic processes. This review discusses imaging strategies and important findings along the transplant timeline, from donor assessment to long-term recipient complications

Is liver transplantation using organs donated after cardiac death cost‐effective or does it decrease waitlist death by increasing recipient death?

AbstractObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the cost‐effectiveness in liver transplantation (LT) of utilizing organs donated after cardiac death (DCD) compared with organs donated after brain death (DBD).MethodsA Markov‐based decision analytic model was created to compare two LT waitlist strategies distinguished by organ type: (i) DBD organs only, and (ii) DBD and DCD organs. The model simulated outcomes for patients over 10 years with annual cycles through one of four health states: survival; ischaemic cholangiopathy; retransplantation, and death. Baseline values and ranges were determined from an extensive literature review. Sensitivity analyses tested model strength and parameter variability.ResultsOverall survival is decreased, and biliary complications and retransplantation are increased in recipients of DCD livers. Recipients of DBD livers gained 5.6 quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) at a cost of US$69 000/QALY, whereas recipients on the DBD + DCD LT waitlist gained 6.0 QALYs at a cost of US$61 000/QALY. The DBD + DCD organ strategy was superior to the DBD organ‐only strategy.conclusionsThe extension of life and quality of life provided by DCD LT to patients on the waiting list who might otherwise not receive a liver transplant makes the continued use of DCD livers cost‐effective

Elements of Weight Management Among Pre-Kidney Transplant Candidates: The Patient Perspective

Obesity and related comorbidities heighten risks for complications in kidney transplant settings. While pre-transplant patients often have access to nutrition counseling and health support, literature is limited on patients' perceptions of weight and motivation to lose weight prior to transplantation. We conducted a survey among ≥18-year-old patients on the kidney transplant waitlist at a single center. Questions addressed weight perception, motivation for weight loss, available resources, and engagement in physical activity. Medical records provided demographic and clinical data. Statistical tests analyzed quantitative data, while free-text responses were thematically grouped and described. Of 1055 patients, 291 responded and were matched with demographic data. Perceived weight changes correlated with actual changes in body mass index (BMI) (<24.9) were more receptive to weight center resources (<30 kg/m2) are most interested in weight loss resources and demonstrate motivation. Furthermore, pre-transplant nutrition counseling correlates with healthier behaviors. Integrating patients’ perspectives enhances pre-transplant protocols by encouraging active involvement in health decisions

Transplant Surgery Pipeline: A Report from the American Society of Transplant Surgeons Pipeline Taskforce

BACKGROUND: Transplant surgery fellowship has evolved over the years and today there are 66 accredited training programs in the US and Canada. There is growing concern, however, about the number of US-trained general surgery residents pursuing transplant surgery. In this study, we examined the transplant surgery pipeline, comparing it with other surgical subspecialty fellowships, and characterized the resident transplantation experience. METHODS: Datasets were compiled and analyzed from surgical fellowship match data obtained from the National Resident Matching Program and ACGME reports and relative fellowship competitiveness was assessed. The surgical resident training experience in transplantation was evaluated. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2018, a total of 1,094 applicants have applied for 946 transplant surgery fellowship positions; 299 (27.3%) were US graduates. During this period, there was a 0.8% decrease per year in US-trained surgical residents matching into transplant surgery (p = 0.042). In addition, transplant surgery was one of the least competitive fellowships compared with other National Resident Matching Program surgical subspeciality fellowships, as measured by the number of US applicants per available fellowship position, average number of fellowship programs listed on each applicant\u27s rank list, and proportion of unfilled fellowship positions (each, p \u3c 0.05). Finally, from 2015 to 2017, there were 57 general surgery residency programs that produced 77 transplant surgery fellows, but nearly one-half of the fellows (n = 36 [46.8%]) came from 16 (28.1%) programs. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant surgery is one of the least competitive and sought after surgical fellowships for US-trained residents. These findings highlight the need for dedicated efforts to increase exposure, mentorship, and interest in transplantation to recruit strong US graduates

Racial-ethnic differences in liver transplant waitlist outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma before and after recent changes to allocation policy

BACKGROUNDIn May 2019, liver transplant (LT) allocation policy changed to limit MELD exception points for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to median MELD at transplant minus three (MMaT-3). We evaluated this policy's impact on waitlist outcomes for HCC candidates, by race and ethnicity, hypothesizing that the introduction of the MMaT-3 reduced inequities in waitlist outcomes.METHODSRetrospective cohort study of the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients, including all adult LT candidates (N = 10 751) who received HCC exception points from May 17, 2017 to May 18, 2019 (pre-policy; N = 6627) to May 19, 2019 to March 1, 2021 (post-policy; N = 4124). We compared incidence of LT and waitlist removal for death or becoming too sick pre- and post-policy for non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and Asian patients using competing risk regression adjusted for candidate characteristics.RESULTSOne-year cumulative incidence of LT decreased significantly pre-/post-policy among White (77.4% vs. 64.5%; p < .01) and Black (76.2% vs. 63.1%; p < .01) candidates only, while a 1-year incidence of death/non-LT waitlist removal decreased significantly only among Hispanics (13.4% vs. 7.5%; p < .01). After covariate adjustment, the effect of the policy change was a significantly decreased incidence of LT for White (SHR: .63 compared to pre-policy; p < .001), Black (SHR: .62; p < .001), and Asian (SHR: .68; p = .002), but no change for Hispanic patients. Only Hispanic patients had a significant decrease in death/waitlist removal after the policy change (SHR: .69; p = .04). Compared to White patients in the pre-policy era, Hispanic (SHR: .88, p < .007) and Asian candidates (SHR: .72; p < .001) had lower unadjusted incidence of LT. This disparity was mitigated in the post-policy era where Hispanic patients had higher likelihood of LT than Whites (SHR: 1.22; p = .002). For the outcome of death/non-LT waitlist removal, the only significant difference was a 42% lower incidence of waitlist removal for Asian compared to White patients in the post-policy era (SHR: .58; p = .03).CONCLUSIONAmong LT recipients with HCC, racial/ethnic subpopulations were differentially affected by the MMAT-3 policy, resulting in a post-policy reduction of some of the previous disparities

Perception of Transplant Surgery and the Pursuit of a Career in Transplant Surgery Among US General Surgery Residents

Background: A recent report by the ASTS Pipeline Taskforce demonstrated that United States (US)-trained general surgery residents are less likely to pursue transplant surgery. We aimed to describe resident perceptions about their transplant surgery experience and factors influencing transplant surgery as a career. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using an anonymous survey composed of multiple choice, closed yes/no, and Likert scale questions. The survey was sent to US general surgery program directors soliciting internal distribution to residents from June to July 2021. Results: A total of 192 surveys were returned from 255 programs. 38% of residents indicated interest in a transplant surgery career or fellowship. Greater than half (59%) answered they were satisfied with operative experience during their transplant rotation, and most (69%) believed transplant surgery attendings had job satisfaction. Rotation factors associated with greater interest in a transplant surgery career included perceived attending and fellow career satisfaction, experience (operative, rounding, teaching) satisfaction, perception of team role importance, identification of an attending mentor, and possible fellowship at home institution (Table 1, Figure 1). Residents with a higher number of surgeries scrubbed and proportion of cases scrubbed as a junior surgeon were more likely to report greater operative satisfaction. Conclusion: In our study, US-trained general surgery residents demonstrated low interest in transplant surgery as a career. Improving the resident transplant rotation experience and the perception of transplant surgery attending satisfaction may improve the transplant pipeline