Response to sunitinib in combination with proton beam radiation in a patient with chondrosarcoma: a case report

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>Chondrosarcoma is well-known to be primarily resistant to conventional radiation and chemotherapy.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We present the case of a 32-year-old Caucasian man with clear cell chondrosarcoma who presented with symptomatic recurrence in his pelvis and metastases to his skull and lungs. Our patient underwent systemic therapy with sunitinib and then consolidation with proton beam radiation to his symptomatic site. He achieved complete symptomatic relief with a significantly improved performance status and had an almost complete and durable metabolic response on fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our findings have important clinical implications and suggest novel clinical trials for this difficult to treat disease.</p

Radiation Induced Mucositis: What the Radiologist Needs to Know

Radiation induced oral mucositis (RIOM) is a common and debilitating complication of radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. RIOM can lead to oral pain, dysphagia, and reduced oral intake, which can be severe enough to necessitate placement of a feeding tube or utilization of total parenteral nutrition. When severe, RIOM can cause premature termination of radiation therapy and can alter treatment plans leading to suboptimal treatment doses. While patient reporting of RIOM symptoms has been the gold standard of documenting RIOM progression, little has been described in the radiology literature concerning the typical imaging findings of RIOM. Herein, we review the pathophysiology and clinical presentation that underlies the development of RIOM with illustrative cases to highlight the relevant imaging findings related to RIOM for the practicing radiologist

Patterns of Progression in Metastatic Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer: An Argument for Local Therapy

Purpose. Despite advances in endocrine therapy (ET), metastatic estrogen receptor positive breast cancer (BrCA) remains incurable. Though the mechanisms of resistance to ET have been studied extensively, the anatomic pattern of disease progression remains poorly characterized. The purpose of this study was to characterize the pattern of progression for patients receiving ET for metastatic BrCA. Methods. The records of 108 patients with metastatic BrCA who progressed on ET were reviewed. Progression was characterized as follows: diffuse progression, progression in greater than 3 sites; oligoprogression, progression in fewer than 3 sites with prior diffuse metastases; and oligometastatic disease with progression, progression in 3 or fewer sites with prior limited metastases. Results. Seventy-four patients (69%) displayed only diffuse disease progression. Conversely, 23 patients (21%) displayed oligoprogression and 11 patients (10%) displayed oligometastases with progression at least once in their disease course. Further analysis of the patients with oligoprogression suggested that in 14 patients the sites of progression would have been amenable to local therapy. Conclusion. Oligoprogressive disease occurs in a significant subset of patients with metastatic BrCA treated with ET. These patients with oligoprogressive disease may be eligible for local therapy, potentially obviating the need to change of systemic therapy

A multi-national report on stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastases: patient selection and follow-up*

Aims Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligometastases is increasingly used with few evidenced-based guidelines. We conducted a survey to determine patient selection and follow-up practice patterns.Materials and methods Seven institutions from US, Canada, Europe, and Australia that recommend SBRT for oligometastases participated in a 72-item survey. Levels of agreement were categorized as strong (6-7 common responses), moderate (4-5), low (2-3), or no agreement.Results There was strong agreement for recommending SBRT for eradication of all detectable oligometastases with most members limiting the number of metastases to five (range 2-5) and three within a single organ (range 2-5). There was moderate agreement for recommending SBRT as consolidative therapy after systemic therapy. There was strong agreement for requiring adequate performance status and no concurrent chemotherapy. Additional areas of strong agreement included staging evaluations, primary diagnosis, target sites, and follow-up recommendations. Several differences emerged, including the use of SBRT for sarcoma oligometastases, treatment response evaluation, and which imaging should be performed during follow-up.Conclusion Significant commonalities and variations exist for patient selection and follow-up recommendations for SBRT for oligometastases. Information from this survey may serve to help clarify the current landscape

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Nonspine Bone Metastases: International Practice Patterns to Guide Treatment Planning

Purpose: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for nonspine bone metastases (NSBM); however, there are limited data informing treatment planning. We surveyed international experts to better understand worldwide practice patterns in delivering NSBM-SBRT. Methods and Materials: Nine international radiation oncologists were invited to participate based on demonstrated expertise with NSBM-SBRT. Experts were sent gross tumor volume contours and planning computed tomography and magnetic resonance images for 11 NSBM cases that covered a range of bony sites, including metastases to long bones (femur, humerus), pelvic bones (ilium, ischium, acetabulum, pubic symphysis), and thoracic bones (rib, sternum, scapula, clavicle). Experts were surveyed regarding treatment planning decisions and dose-fractionation selection. Descriptive analysis was conducted on the survey data. Results: All experts participated and completed the survey. Most (56%) routinely fused magnetic resonance imaging with planning computed tomography imaging for target delineation. Dose fractionation schedules included single-fraction (18-24 Gy/1), 2 fractions (24 Gy/2), 3 fractions (28-30 Gy/3), 5 fractions (30-50 Gy/5), and 10 fractions (42-50 Gy/10). Although doses varied considerably, all had a biological equivalent dose of ≤100 Gy10. Five-fraction schedules were most common, specifically 35 Gy/5, with 56% opting for this dose-fractionation in at least 1 case. Other dose-fractionation schedules used by at least 3 experts were 20 Gy/1, 30 Gy/3, and 30 Gy/5. Three experts prescribed 2 dose volumes using a simultaneous integrated boost. The 2 dose volumes were either the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume (CTV) or a smaller CTV (CTV1) encompassed within a larger CTV (CTV2) (eg, 30 Gy/3 to gross tumor volume or CTV1 and 15-24 Gy/3 to CTV or CTV2). Dose de-escalation was recommended by all experts in the setting of previous SBRT and by most in the context of previous convevoltherapy or in weight-bearing bones, especially if moderate-to-severe cortical erosion was present. Conclusions: Significant heterogeneity exists worldwide in radiation technique and dose-fractionation for NSBM-SBRT, which supports the need for consensus guidelines to inform practice and trial design. Nonetheless, these data demonstrate expert agreement on selecting dose schedules with a biologically effective dose ≤100 Gy10, reasons for dose de-escalation, and in determining acceptable dose schedules based on bony site