Safety and feasibility of ultrasound-triggered targeted drug delivery of doxorubicin from thermosensitive liposomes in liver tumours (TARDOX): a single-centre, open-label, phase 1 trial

BACKGROUND: Previous preclinical research has shown that extracorporeal devices can be used to enhance the delivery and distribution of systemically administered anticancer drugs, resulting in increased intratumoural concentrations. We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of targeted release and enhanced delivery of doxorubicin to solid tumours from thermosensitive liposomes triggered by mild hyperthermia, induced non-invasively by focused ultrasound. METHODS: We did an open-label, single-centre, phase 1 trial in a single UK hospital. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with unresectable and non-ablatable primary or secondary liver tumours of any histological subtype were considered for the study. Patients received a single intravenous infusion (50 mg/m2) of lyso-thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin (LTLD), followed by extracorporeal focused ultrasound exposure of a single target liver tumour. The trial had two parts: in part I, patients had a real-time thermometry device implanted intratumourally, whereas patients in part II proceeded without thermometry and we used a patient-specific model to predict optimal exposure parameters. We assessed tumour biopsies obtained before and after focused ultrasound exposure for doxorubicin concentration and distribution. The primary endpoint was at least a doubling of total intratumoural doxorubicin concentration in at least half of the patients treated, on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02181075, and is now closed to recruitment. FINDINGS: Between March 13, 2015, and March 27, 2017, ten patients were enrolled in the study (six patients in part I and four in part II), and received a dose of LTLD followed by focused ultrasound exposure. The treatment resulted in an average increase of 3·7 times in intratumoural biopsy doxorubicin concentrations, from an estimate of 2·34 μg/g (SD 0·93) immediately after drug infusion to 8·56 μg/g (5·69) after focused ultrasound. Increases of two to ten times were observed in seven (70%) of ten patients, satisfying the primary endpoint. Serious adverse events registered were expected grade 4 transient neutropenia in five patients and prolonged hospital stay due to unexpected grade 1 confusion in one patient. Grade 3-4 adverse events recorded were neutropenia (grade 3 in one patient and grade 4 in five patients), and grade 3 anaemia in one patient. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: The combined treatment of LTLD and non-invasive focused ultrasound hyperthermia in this study seemed to be clinically feasible, safe, and able to enhance intratumoural drug delivery, providing targeted chemo-ablative response in human liver tumours that were refractory to standard chemotherapy. FUNDING: Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research

Focused ultrasound hyperthermia for targeted drug release from thermosensitive liposomes: Results from a phase I trial

Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility and safety of using focused ultrasound planning models to determine the treatment parameters needed to deliver volumetric mild hyperthermia for targeted drug delivery without real-time thermometry. Materials and Methods This study was part of the Targeted Doxorubicin, or TARDOX, phase I prospective trial of focused ultrasound-mediated, hyperthermia-triggered drug delivery to solid liver tumors ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02181075). Ten participants (age range, 49-68 years; average age, 60 years; four women) were treated from March 2015 to March 2017 by using a clinically approved focused ultrasound system to release doxorubicin from lyso-thermosensitive liposomes. Ultrasonic heating of target tumors (treated volume: 11-73 cm3 [mean ± standard deviation, 50 cm3 ± 26]) was monitored in six participants by using a minimally invasive temperature sensor; four participants were treated without real-time thermometry. For all participants, CT images were used with a patient-specific hyperthermia model to define focused ultrasound treatment plans. Feasibility was assessed by comparing model-prescribed focused ultrasound powers to those implemented for treatment. Safety was assessed by evaluating MR images and biopsy specimens for evidence of thermal ablation and monitoring adverse events. Results The mean difference between predicted and implemented treatment powers was -0.1 W ± 17.7 (n = 10). No evidence of focused ultrasound-related adverse effects, including thermal ablation, was found. Conclusion In this 10-participant study, the authors confirmed the feasibility of using focused ultrasound-mediated hyperthermia planning models to define treatment parameters that safely enabled targeted, noninvasive drug delivery to liver tumors while monitored with B-mode guidance and without real-time thermometry. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Dickey and Levi-Polyachenko in this issue

Focused ultrasound hyperthermia for targeted drug release from thermosensitive liposomes: results from a phase I trial

Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility and safety of using focused ultrasound planning models to determine the treatment parameters needed to deliver volumetric mild hyperthermia for targeted drug delivery without real-time thermometry. Materials and Methods This study was part of the Targeted Doxorubicin, or TARDOX, phase I prospective trial of focused ultrasound–mediated, hyperthermia-triggered drug delivery to solid liver tumors (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02181075). Ten participants (age range, 49–68 years; average age, 60 years; four women) were treated from March 2015 to March 2017 by using a clinically approved focused ultrasound system to release doxorubicin from lyso-thermosensitive liposomes. Ultrasonic heating of target tumors (treated volume: 11–73 cm3 [mean ± standard deviation, 50 cm3 ± 26]) was monitored in six participants by using a minimally invasive temperature sensor; four participants were treated without real-time thermometry. For all participants, CT images were used with a patient-specific hyperthermia model to define focused ultrasound treatment plans. Feasibility was assessed by comparing model-prescribed focused ultrasound powers to those implemented for treatment. Safety was assessed by evaluating MR images and biopsy specimens for evidence of thermal ablation and monitoring adverse events. Results The mean difference between predicted and implemented treatment powers was −0.1 W ± 17.7 (n = 10). No evidence of focused ultrasound–related adverse effects, including thermal ablation, was found. Conclusion In this 10-participant study, the authors confirmed the feasibility of using focused ultrasound–mediated hyperthermia planning models to define treatment parameters that safely enabled targeted, noninvasive drug delivery to liver tumors while monitored with B-mode guidance and without real-time thermometry