Cobalamin in inflammation III — glutathionylcobalamin and methylcobalamin/adenosylcobalamin coenzymes: the sword in the stone? How cobalamin may directly regulate the nitric oxide synthases

Several mysteries surround the structure and function of the nitric oxide synthases (NOS). The NOS oxygenase domain structure is unusually open with a large area of solvent that could accommodate an unidentified ligand. The exact mechanism of the two-step five-electron monoxygenation of arginine to NG-hydroxy-L-arginine, thence to citrulline and nitric oxide (NO), is not clear, particularly as arginine/NG-hydroxy-L-arginine is bound at a great distance to the supposed catalytic heme Fe [III], as the anti-stereoisomer. The Return of the Scarlet Pimpernel Paper proposed that cobalamin is a primary indirect regulator of the NOS. An additional direct regulatory effect of the ‘base-off’ dimethylbenzimidazole of glutathionylcobalamin (GSCbl), which may act as a sixth ligand to the heme iron, promote Co-oriented, BH4/BH3 radical catalysed oxidation of L-arginine to NO, and possibly regulate the rate of inducible NOS/NO production by the NOS dimers, is further advanced. The absence of homology between the NOS and methionine synthase/methylmalonyl CoA mutase may enable GSCbl to regulate both sets of enzymes simultaneously by completely separate mechanisms. Thus, cobalamin may exert central control over both pro-and anti-inflammatory systems

Potential of nintedanib in treatment of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases

A proportion of patients with fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) develop a progressive phenotype characterised by decline in lung function, worsening quality of life and early mortality. Other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), there are no approved drugs for fibrosing ILDs and a poor evidence base to support current treatments. Fibrosing ILDs with a progressive phenotype show commonalities in clinical behaviour and in the pathogenic mechanisms that drive disease worsening. Nintedanib is an intracellular inhibitor of tyrosine kinases that has been approved for treatment of IPF and has recently been shown to reduce the rate of lung function decline in patients with ILD associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD). In vitro data demonstrate that nintedanib inhibits several steps in the initiation and progression of lung fibrosis, including the release of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic mediators, migration and differentiation of fibrocytes and fibroblasts, and deposition of extracellular matrix. Nintedanib also inhibits the proliferation of vascular cells. Studies in animal models with features of fibrosing ILDs such as IPF, SSc-ILD, rheumatoid arthritis-ILD, hypersensitivity pneumonitis and silicosis demonstrate that nintedanib has anti-fibrotic activity irrespective of the trigger for the lung pathology. This suggests that nintedanib inhibits fundamental processes in the pathogenesis of fibrosis. A trial of nintedanib in patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs other than IPF (INBUILD) will report results in 2019

Chemokines produced by mesothelial cells: huGRO-α, IP-10, MCP-1 and RANTES

Recently we showed the in vivo relevance of chemokines in cases of bacterial peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. Mesothelial cells, the most numerous cells in the peritoneal cavity, are hypothesized to function as a main source of chemokine production. We investigated the time- and dose-dependent expression patterns of four chemokines by mesothelial cells at the mRNA and protein level in response to stimulation with physiological doses of proinflammatory mediators that are present at the site of bacterial inflammation. Besides the chemokines huGRO-α (attractant for neutrophils), MCP-1 and RANTES (monocyte attractants), the expression and production of IP-10 was analysed. Mesothelial cells were cultured and stimulated with either IL-1β, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) or IFN-γ or combinations of these. The time- and dose-dependent mRNA expression of the chemokines was determined by Northern blot analysis and the protein production by ELISA. It was concluded that mesothelial cells could indeed be triggered by the mentioned stimuli to induce mRNA and protein production (huGRO-α and IP-10) or to augment constitutive protein production (MCP-1). However, RANTES mRNA and protein production could only be induced in some cases and only in small amounts. The chemokine response of mesothelial cells was regulated differentially, depending on the stimulus and the chemokine measured. In distinct cases, combination of the stimuli led to synergy in mRNA expression and protein production. The presented in vitro data support our hypothesis that mesothelial cells in vivo are the main source of relevant chemokines in response to proinflammatory mediators, suggesting an important role for mesothelial cells in host defence