33 research outputs found
Analysis of misoprostol and chlorhexidine policy gains in Pakistan: the advocacy experience of Mercy Corps Pakistan
Oral misoprostol for third stage of labor: a randomized placebo-controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether orally administered misoprostol during the third stage of labor is efficient in reducing postpartum blood loss. METHODS: In a double-masked trial, during vaginal delivery women were randomly assigned to receive a single oral dose of misoprostol (600 microg) or placebo in third stage of labor, immediately after cord clamping. The third stage of labor was managed routinely by early cord clamping and controlled cord traction; oxytocin was administered only if blood loss seemed more than usual. Blood loss was estimated by the delivering physician and differences in hematocrit were measured before and after delivery. RESULTS: Mean (+/- standard error of the mean) estimated blood loss (345 +/- 19.5 mL versus 417 +/- 25.9 mL, P = .031) and hematocrit difference (4.5 +/- 0.9% versus 7.9 +/- 1.2%, P = .014) were significantly lower in women who received misoprostol than those who received placebo. Fewer women in the misoprostol group had postpartum hemorrhage (blood loss of at least 500 mL), but that difference was not statistically significant (7% versus 15%, P = .43). Additional oxytocin before or after placental separation was used less often in the misoprostol group (16% versus 38%, P = .047). There were no differences in the length of third stage of labor (8 +/- 0.9 minutes versus 9 +/- 1 minutes, P = .947). There were no differences in pain during third stage of labor, postpartum fever, or diarrhea, but shivering was more frequent in the misoprostol group. CONCLUSION: Oral misoprostol administered in the third stage of labor reduced postpartum blood loss and might be effective in reducing incidence of postpartum hemorrhage
In utero transplantation of autologous and allogeneic fetal liver stem cells in ovine fetuses
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of autologous stem cell transplantation in fetal sheep and to compare short-term engraftment of allogeneic and autologous fetal liver stem cells in an immunocompetent large animal model. STUDY DESIGN: Fetal liver stem cells were collected from preimmune sheep fetuses with an open or ultrasound-guided technique. After being labeled with PKH26, the cells were transplanted intraperitoneally into allogeneic and autologous fetal recipients at 48 to 64 days of gestation. Engraftment was determined by flow cytometry and real-time polymerase chain reaction 1 to 2 weeks after transplantation. RESULTS: Fetal loss rate was 29% (allogeneic transplantation) and 73% (autologous transplantation). Engraftment of donor cells was found in all fetuses, with a level of < or =4.7% in fetal liver, spleen, bone marrow, blood and thymus. Overall, there was no difference between allogeneic and autologous grafts. CONCLUSION: Autologous in utero transplantation of fetal liver stem cells in fetal sheep is feasible, but yields a high loss rate. Differences in the major histocompatibility complex between donor and recipient seems not to have a major impact on stem cell engraftment early in gestation; major histocompatibility complex-independent donor/host competition might be responsible for low engraftment in immunocompetent recipients