50 research outputs found
Deciding Together?:Best Interests and Shared Decision-Making in Paediatric Intensive Care
In the western healthcare, shared decision making has become the orthodox approach to making healthcare choices as a way of promoting patient autonomy. Despite the fact that the autonomy paradigm is poorly suited to paediatric decision making, such an approach is enshrined in English common law. When reaching moral decisions, for instance when it is unclear whether treatment or non-treatment will serve a child’s best interests, shared decision making is particularly questionable because agreement does not ensure moral validity. With reference to current common law and focusing on intensive care practice, this paper investigates what claims shared decision making may have to legitimacy in a paediatric intensive care setting. Drawing on key texts, I suggest these identify advantages to parents and clinicians but not to the child who is the subject of the decision. Without evidence that shared decision making increases the quality of the decision that is being made, it appears that a focus on the shared nature of a decision does not cohere with the principle that the best interests of the child should remain paramount. In the face of significant pressures toward the displacement of the child’s interests in a shared decision, advantages of a shared decision to decisional quality require elucidation. Although a number of arguments of this nature may have potential, should no such advantages be demonstrable we have cause to revise our commitment to either shared decision making or the paramountcy of the child in these circumstances
Active Packaging Technologies with an Emphasis on Antimicrobial Packaging and its Applications
Active Packaging Technologies with an Emphasis on Antimicrobial Packaging and its Applications
In response to the dynamic changes in current consumer demand and market trends, the area of
Active Packaging (AP) is becoming increasingly significant. Principal AP systems include those that involve
oxygen scavenging, moisture absorption and control, carbon dioxide and ethanol generation, and antimicrobial
(AM) migrating and nonmigrating systems. Of these active packaging systems, the AM version is of great importance.
This article reviews: (1) the different categories of AP concepts with particular regard to the activity of AM
packaging and its effects on food products, (2) the development of AM and AP materials, and (3) the current and
future applications of AM packaging
Comparison of formoterol and terbutaline for as-needed treatment of asthma: a randomised trial
Background Asthma guidelines recommend that long-acting inhaled beta -agonists should be used as maintenance therapy for patients with asthma inadequately controlled on an inhaled corticosteroid. We studied the safety and efficacy of the long acting beta -agonist formoterol compared with terbutaline, each taken as needed, in patients with moderate to severe asthma. Methods Patients were taking an inhaled corticosteroid (mean dose 870 mug daily) and had a forced expiratory volume in 1 a (FEV1) of at least 50% predicted (mean 74%). Those requiring an inhaled beta -agonist three to eight times a day during the study run-in period (362 of 621 who started) were randomly assigned formoterol 4.5 mug or terbutaline 0.5 mg as needed by Turbuhaler in daily doses up to 54 mug and 6 mg, respectively, for 12 weeks in a double-blind, parallel-group study. Analyses were by intention to treat. Findings The 362 randomised patients (157 men, 205 women) had a mean age of 47 years. Patients taking formoterol had a longer time to their first severe asthma exacerbation (relative-risk ratio 0.55 [95% CI 0.34-0 8.9]), took fewer inhalations of study drug, and had larger increases in FEV1 (5%) and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (mean difference in increase 11 L/min and 8 L/min) than those taking terbutaline. No safety issues were identified. Interpretation When taken as needed, formoterol 4.5 mug provided better asthma control than terbutaline 0.5 mg in patients requiring moderate doses of relief medication despite inhaled corticosteroid treatment. Safety studies should be extended to a wider population of patients with asthma
