Stratificazione del rischio negli infarti senza onde-Q: ruolo dell'ecocardiografia a riposo e da sforzo

To assess the relation between the extent of myocardial necrosis and the presence of myocardium at risk in myocardial infarction without Q waves (NQMI) we studied by echocardiography the prevalence of jeopardized myocardium in a group of NQMI stratified on the basis of left ventricular wall motion (akinesis, hypokinesis, normal kinesis). We have studied 60 consecutive patients with non-Q myocardial infarction. Patients were examined by 2D echo at rest (V-VI day from the acute episode) and during symptoms limited bicycle ergometric test (ExT) (XX-XXX day). Regional left ventricular wall motion was evaluated as normal or asynergic (severe hypokinetic, akinetic) and the ExT was considered positive in case of new asynergic areas or ECG criteria. 2D echo at rest was technically satisfactory in 56 patients, 19 showed almost an akinetic segment (Aci) 17 had hypokinetic areas (Ipo) and 20 had normal left ventricle kinesis (Norc). Wall motion abnormalities were localized more frequently in the apex and lateral areas. During exercise 2D echo was performed in 46 patients (82%) with 23 positive tests (50%). Stratifying the population on the basis of left ventricle wall motion we observed a major number of positive tests in the group of patients with normal wall motion in comparison with those with asynergic areas at rest (Norc 66.6%, Ipo 35.7%, Aci 42.6% p less than 0.05 Nore vs Ipo and Nore vs Aci) despite the same CAD extension. These data show the heterogeneity of the NQMI that likely includes patients with transmural (asynergy group) and subendocardial MI (normal kinesis group), the latter with a higher degree of myocardium at risk

Influence of residual perfusion within the infarct zone on the natural history of left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction.

This study used myocardial contrast echocardiography to investigate the extent of residual perfusion within the infarct zone in a select group of patients with recently reperfused myocardial infarction and evaluated its influence on the ultimate infarct size. BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the status of myocardial perfusion within postischemic dysfunctional segments at predischarge and on its influence on late regional and global functional recovery. METHODS: Twenty patients with acute myocardial infarction were selected for the study. Patients met the following inclusion criteria: 1) single-vessel coronary artery disease; 2) patency of infarct-related artery with persistent postischemic dysfunctional segments at predischarge; 3) stable clinical condition up to 6 months after hospital discharge. All selected patients underwent coronary angiography and myocardial contrast echocardiography before hospital discharge and repeated the echocardiographic examination 6 months later. Patients were grouped according to the pattern of contrast enhancement in predischarge dysfunctional segments. RESULTS: In nine patients (group I), the length of segments showing abnormal contraction coincided with that of the contrast defect segments. In the remaining 11 patients (group II), postischemic dysfunctional segments were partly or completely reperfused. There was no difference between the two groups in asynergic segment length at predischarge (7.3 +/- 2.5 vs. 7.2 +/- 4.3 cm, p = NS). At follow-up study, asynergic segment length was significantly reduced in group II patients, whereas no changes were observed in group I patients (from 7.2 +/- 4.3 to 4.7 +/- 3.7 cm, p < 0.005; and from 7.3 +/- 2.5 to 7.5 +/- 2.9 cm, p = NS, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with a predischarge patent infarct-related artery, further improvement in regional and global function may be expected during follow-up when residual perfusion in the infarct zone is present

The diagnostic accuracy of pharmacological stress echocardiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines state that "dobutamine stress echo has substantially higher sensitivity than vasodilator stress echo for detection of coronary artery stenosis" while the European Society of Cardiology guidelines and the European Association of Echocardiography recommendations conclude that "the two tests have very similar applications". Who is right?</p> <p>Aim</p> <p>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine versus dipyridamole stress echocardiography through an evidence-based approach.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>From PubMed search, we identified all papers with coronary angiographic verification and head-to-head comparison of dobutamine stress echo (40 mcg/kg/min ± atropine) versus dipyridamole stress echo performed with state-of-the art protocols (either 0.84 mg/kg in 10' plus atropine, or 0.84 mg/kg in 6' without atropine). A total of 5 papers have been found. Pooled weight meta-analysis was performed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>the 5 analyzed papers recruited 435 patients, 299 with and 136 without angiographically assessed coronary artery disease (quantitatively assessed stenosis > 50%). Dipyridamole and dobutamine showed similar accuracy (87%, 95% confidence intervals, CI, 83–90, vs. 84%, CI, 80–88, p = 0.48), sensitivity (85%, CI 80–89, vs. 86%, CI 78–91, p = 0.81) and specificity (89%, CI 82–94 vs. 86%, CI 75–89, p = 0.15).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>When state-of-the art protocols are considered, dipyridamole and dobutamine stress echo have similar accuracy, specificity and – most importantly – sensitivity for detection of CAD. European recommendations concluding that "<it>dobutamine and vasodilators (at appropriately high doses) are equally potent ischemic stressors for inducing wall motion abnormalities in presence of a critical coronary artery stenosis</it>" are evidence-based.</p

Influence of reperfusion induced by thrombolytic treatment on natural history of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormality in acute myocardial infarction.

Although several studies have investigated left ventricular (LV) function after reperfusion interventions, it is still unclear whether benefits result from successful therapy or whether such benefits only reflect the natural history of a subgroup of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study evaluates the unique effect of thrombolytic therapy on the natural history of regional LV wall motion dysfunction. One hundred seventy-six patients with AMI were studied: 82 patients (group A) underwent conventional treatment and 94 (group B) thrombolytic therapy. LV regional improvement, evaluated by changes in echo score between admission and predischarge examination, was present more frequently in group B (28%) than in group A (17%). Furthermore, improved patients in group B had higher admission echo scores (7.5 +/- 3.5 vs 6.3 +/- 3.1), a prevalence of anterior AMI (68 vs 30.1%) and a higher rate of coronary patency (92 vs 58% in patients who had no improvement). In group A patients the rate of coronary patency was similar in those who did (46.1%) and did not have (36.1%) improvement. Observations at 12 to 18 months showed similar data in group A patients and in group B patients without improvement, whereas a marginal additional improvement was observed in group B patients who had in-hospital improvement. These observations demonstrate that LV function recovery is more frequent and marked in treated than in untreated patients. Follow-up results suggest a prolonged beneficial effect of thrombolytic treatment on LV function. The highest rate of coronary patency in improved group B patients underline the role of reperfusion on natural history of LV dysfunction after AMI