13 research outputs found
Explaining interviewer effects and respondent behavior: Theoretical models and empirical analysis
Theory of reasoned action, interviewer effects, respondent behavior, need for social approval, structural equation models, multiple group comparison,
Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking
Understanding the extent and limits of non-conscious processing is an important step on the road to a thorough understanding of the cognitive and cerebral correlates of conscious perception. In this article, we present a critical review of research on subliminal perception during masking and other related experimental conditions. Although initially controversial, the possibility that a broad variety of processes can be activated by a non-reportable stimulus is now well established. Behavioural findings of subliminal priming indicate that a masked word or digit can have an influence on perceptual, lexical and semantic levels, while neuroimaging directly visualizes the brain activation that it evokes in several cortical areas. This activation is often attenuated under subliminal presentation conditions compared to consciously reportable conditions, but there are sufficiently many exceptions, in paradigms such as the attentional blink, to indicate that high activation, per se, is not a sufficient condition for conscious access to occur. We conclude by arguing that for a stimulus to reach consciousness, two factors are jointly needed: (i) the input stimulus must have enough strength (which can be prevented by masking) and (ii) it must receive top-down attention (which can be prevented by drawing attention to another stimulus or task). This view leads to a distinction between two types of non-conscious processes, which we call subliminal and preconscious. According to us, maintaining this distinction is essential in order to make sense of the growing neuroimaging data on the neural correlates of consciousness
Cognitive Science and Phenomenal Consciousness: A Dilemma, and How to Avoid It
When it comes to applying computational theory to the problem of phenomenal consciousness, cognitive scientists appear to face a dilemma. The only
strategy that seems to be available is one that explains consciousness in terms of special kinds of computational processes. But such theories, while
they dominate the field, have counter-intuitive consequences; in particular, they force one to accept that phenomenal experience is composed of
information processing effects. For cognitive scientists, therefore, it seems to come down to a choice between a counter-intuitive theory or no theory at
all. We offer a way out of this dilemma. We argue that the computational theory of mind doesn't force cognitive scientists to explain consciousness in
terms of computational processes, as there is an alternative strategy available: one that focuses on the representational vehicles that encode information
in the brain. This alternative approach to consciousness allows us to do justice to the standard intuitions about phenomenal experience, yet remain
within the confines of cognitive science
The role of pragmatic rules in the conjunction fallacy
Conjunction fallacy, probabilistic reasoning, pragmatics, frequency format,