The impact of old age on cancer-specific and non-cancer-related survival following elective potentially curative surgery for Dukes A/B colorectal cancer

Previous studies have suggested that survival following surgery for colorectal cancer is poorer in the elderly. However, the findings were inconsistent and none of the studies adjusted for case mix. The aim of this study was to establish whether there were age-related differences in cancer (colorectal)-specific and non-cancer (colorectal)-related survival in patients undergoing elective potentially curative resection for Dukes stage A/B colorectal cancer. One thousand and forty three patients who underwent elective potentially curative resection for Dukes' A/B colorectal cancer between 1991 and 1994 in 11 hospitals in Scotland were included in the study. Ten year cancer-specific and non-cancer-related survival and the hazard ratios were calculated according to age groups (<64; 65–74/>74 years). On follow-up 273 patients died of their cancer and 328 died of non-cancer-related causes. At 10 years, overall survival was 45%, cancer specific was 70% and non-cancer-related survival was 64%. On multivariate analysis of all factors, age (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.18–1.62, P<0.001), sex (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.36–2.23, P<0.001), site (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.11–1.81, P<0.01) and Dukes' stage (HR 1.71, 1.19–2.47, P<0.01) were independently associated with cancer-specific survival. On multivariate analysis of all factors, age (HR 2.14, 1.84–2.49, P<0.001), sex (HR 1.43, 1.15–1.79, P<0.01) and deprivation (HR 1.30, 1.09–1.55, P<0.01) were independently associated with non-cancer-related survival. The results of this study show that increasing age impacts negatively both on cancer-specific and non-cancer-related survival following elective potentially curative resection for node-negative colorectal cancer. However, the effect of increasing age is greater on the non-cancer-related survival. These results suggest that cancer-specific and non-cancer-related mortality should be considered separately in survival analysis of these cancer patients

A clinical risk score to predict 3-, 5- and 10-year survival in patients undergoing surgery for Dukes B colorectal cancer

<p>Background: The prognosis of patients with Dukes stage B colorectal cancer is unpredictable and there is continuing interest in simply and reliably identifying patients at high risk of developing recurrence and dying of their disease. The aim of this study was to devise a clinical risk score to predict 3-, 5- and 10-year survival in patients undergoing surgery for Dukes stage B colorectal cancer.</p> <p>Methods: A total of 1350 patients who underwent surgery for Dukes stage B colorectal cancer between 1991 and 1994 in 11 hospitals in Scotland were included in the analysis.</p> <p>Results: On follow-up, 926 patients died of whom 479 died of their cancer. At 10 years, cancer-specific survival was 61% and overall survival was 38%. On multivariate analysis, age ≥75 (hazard ratio (HR) 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.82, P=0.001), emergency presentation (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.27-1.99, P<0.001) and anastomotic leak (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.24-3.78, P<0.01) were independently associated with cancer-specific survival in colon cancer. On multivariate analysis, only age ≥75 (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.14-2.18, P<0.01) was associated with cancer-specific survival in rectal cancer. Age, presentation and anastomotic leak hazards could be simply added to form a clinical risk score from 0 to 2 in colon cancer. In patients with Dukes B stage colon cancer, the cancer-specific survival at 5 years for patients with a cumulative score 0 was 81%, 1 was 67% and 2 was 63%. The cancer-specific survival rate at 10 years for patients with a clinical risk score of 0 was 72%, 1 was 58% and 2 was 53%.</p> <p>Conclusion: The results of this study, in a mature cohort, introduce a new simple clinical risk score for patients undergoing surgery for Dukes B colon cancer. This provides a solid foundation for the examination of the impact of additional factors and treatment on prediction of 3-, 5- and 10-year cancer-specific survival.</p&gt

The impact of anti-inflammatory agents on the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer

Although there is increasing appreciation of the role of the host inflammatory response in determining outcome in patients in colorectal cancer, there has been little concerted effort to favourably manipulate cancer-associated inflammation, either alone or in combination with current oncological treatment. Epidemiological and cardiovascular disease studies have identified aspirin, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and statins as potential chemotherapeutic agents which may manipulate the host inflammatory response to the benefit of the patient with cancer. Similarly, evidence of a chemotherapeutic effect of histamine-2 receptor antagonists, again mediated by an immunomodulatory effect, has previously led to increased interest in their use in gastrointestinal cancer. Extensive pre-clinical data and a limited number of clinical investigations have proposed a direct effect of these agents on tumour biology, with an anti-tumour effect on several of the hallmarks of cancer, including proliferative capacity, evasion from apoptosis and cell cycle regulation, and invasive capability of tumour cells. Furthermore, clinical evidence has suggested a pertinent role in down-regulating the systemic inflammatory response whilst favourably influencing the local inflammatory response within the tumour microenvironment. Despite such compelling results, the clinical applicability of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statins and histamine-2 receptor antagonists has not been fully realised, particularly in patients identified at high risk on the basis of inflammatory parameters. In the present review, we examine the potential role that these agents may play in improving survival and reducing recurrence in patients with potentially curative colorectal cancer, and in particular focus on their effects on the local and systemic inflammatory response

Outcome in colorectal cancer – tumour, stroma and so much more

No abstract available

Assessment of vitamin E status in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome: plasma, plasma corrected for lipids or red blood cell measurements?

<b>Background:</b> There is some evidence that the plasma vitamin E status is perturbed as part of systemic inflammatory response and correcting this with other plasma markers may not lead to reliable results. The aim of the present study was to examine the longitudinal inter-relationships between plasma and red blood cell vitamin α-tocopherol in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. <b>Methods:</b> α-tocopherol concentrations were measured, by HPLC, in plasma and red blood cells in normal subjects (n = 67) and in critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (n = 82) on admission and on follow-up. <b>Results:</b> Plasma α-tocopherol was significantly lower in the critically ill patients compared with the controls (all p < 0.001) with 41% of patients having concentrations below the 95% confidence interval. In contrast, when corrected for cholesterol, α-tocopherol concentrations were significantly higher in the critically ill patients compared with the control group (p < 0.001, 27% above the 95% confidence interval) and when corrected for triglycerides, α-tocopherol concentrations were significantly lower in the critically ill patients compared with the control group (p < 0.001). Red blood cell α-tocopherol corrected for haemoglobin was similar (p = 0.852) in the critically ill patients compared with control subjects. The longitudinal measurements (n = 53) gave similar results. <b>Conclusions:</b> These results indicate that there is a discrepancy between vitamin E measurements in plasma, in plasma corrected for lipids and in red blood cells. Although the value of correcting vitamin E concentrations by lipids is well established in population studies, the present study indicates that such correction is unreliable in the presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and that vitamin E status should be assessed using red blood cell α-tocopherol measurement

Comparison of the prognostic value of inflammation based pathological and biochemical criteria in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer

<b>Objective</b>: To examine interrelationships between the local inflammatory response (Klintrup and Jass scores) and the systemic inflammatory response (Glasgow prognostic score [GPS]), and compare their prognostic value in patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. <b>Background</b>: Both localized peritumoral inflammatory cell infiltrate and the host systemic inflammatory response are known to have prognostic value in colorectal cancer. However, the interrelationships of biochemical and cellular components of the systemic inflammatory response and the local inflammatory response are poorly understood. <b>Methods</b>: Retrospective study of 287 patients who underwent surgery between 1997 and 2004. Data were collected from routine preoperative blood tests. Routine pathology specimens were scored according to Jass and Klintrup criteria for peritumoral infiltrate. <b>Results</b>: Increased Dukes stage was associated with less peritumoral infiltrate (Jass criteria: P < 0.001, Klintrup criteria: P < 0.01). Increased modified GPS (mGPS) was associated with increased circulating white cell (P < 0.01) and neutrophil (P < 0.01) counts and low lymphocyte counts (P < 0.01). Increased circulating white cell count was associated with increased neutrophil count (P < 0.001) and low-grade peritumoral infiltrate (P < 0.05, Klintrup criteria). Jass and Klintrup criteria for peritumoral infiltrate were directly associated (P < 0.001). On univariate survival analysis of patients with node-negative disease (Dukes A and B), age (P < 0.01), mGPS (P < 0.01), neutrophil count (P < 0.05), and Klintrup criteria (P < 0.05) were associated with cancer-specific survival. On multivariate survival analysis in node-negative disease, the mGPS (hazard ratio: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.27-5.35, P < 0.01) and Klintrup criteria (hazard ratio: 6.31, 95% CI: 1.40-28.44, P < 0.05) were independently associated with cancer-specific survival. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results of the present study suggest low peritumoral infiltrate (Klintrup criteria) and increased systemic inflammation (mGPS criteria) are linked through the cell-mediated immune system. Furthermore, both pathologic (Klintrup) and biochemical (mGPS) measures of the inflammatory response predict survival after colorectal cancer surgery

The impact of age, sex and socioeconomic deprivation on outcomes in a colorectal cancer screening programme

<p>Background: Population-based colorectal cancer screening has been shown to reduce cancer specific mortality and is used across the UK. Despite evidence that older age, male sex and deprivation are associated with an increased incidence of colorectal cancer, uptake of bowel cancer screening varies across demographic groups. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of age, sex and deprivation on outcomes throughout the screening process.</p> <p>Methods: A prospectively maintained database, encompassing the first screening round of a faecal occult blood test screening programme in a single geographical area, was analysed.</p> <p>Results: Overall, 395 096 individuals were invited to screening, 204 139 (52%) participated and 6 079 (3%) tested positive. Of the positive tests, 4 625 (76%) attended for colonoscopy and cancer was detected in 396 individuals (9%). Lower uptake of screening was associated with younger age, male sex and deprivation (all p<0.001). Only deprivation was associated with failure to proceed to colonoscopy following a positive test (p<0.001). Despite higher positivity rates in those that were more deprived (p<0.001), the likelihood of detecting cancer in those attending for colonoscopy was lower (8% most deprived vs 10% least deprived, p = 0.003).</p> <p>Conclusion: Individuals who are deprived are less likely to participate in screening, less likely to undergo colonoscopy and less likely to have cancer identified as a result of a positive test. Therefore, this study suggests that strategies aimed at improving participation of deprived individuals in colorectal cancer screening should be directed at all stages of the screening process and not just uptake of the test.</p&gt

Interdisciplinary care to enhance mental health and social and emotional wellbeing

This chapter discusses and defines the difference between multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary/interprofessional care with a focus on interdisciplinary care as a model of practice which supports equality and interconnectedness of responsibility amongst team members when working in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander contexts. The chapter describes the various professional and para professional practitioners that comprise interdisciplinary teams working in mental health and wellbeing contexts and their roles. The focus is on an interdisciplinary team approach to providing health and wellbeing care as its ethos of equal relationships and interdependent collaboration is more encompassing of social and emotional wellbeing values. Identification of the issues and limitations of interdisciplinary practice and the means to addressing them are explored within the context of how interdisciplinary care fits into mental health best practice and human rights

The relationship between pre-operative psoas and skeletal muscle parameters and survival following endovascular aneurysm repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sarcopenia is characterised by chronically reduced skeletal muscle volume and function, and is determined radiologically by psoas and skeletal muscle measurement. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to examine the relationship between pre-operative CT-derived psoas and skeletal muscle parameters and outcomes in patients undergoing EVAR and F/B-EVAR for aortic aneurysm. The MEDLINE database was interrogated for studies investigating the effect of pre-operative CT-diagnosed sarcopenia on outcomes following EVAR and F/B-EVAR. The systematic review was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was overall mortality. RevMan 5.4.1 was used to perform meta-analysis. PROSPERO Database Registration Number: CRD42021273085. Ten relevant studies were identified, one reporting skeletal muscle parameters, and the remaining nine reporting psoas muscle parameters, which were used for meta-analysis. There were a total of 2563 patients included (2062 EVAR, 501 F/B-EVAR), with mean follow-up ranging from 25 to 101 months. 836 patients (33%) were defined as radiologically sarcopenic. In all studies, the combined HR for all-cause mortality in sarcopenic versus non-sarcopenic patients was 2.61 (1.67–4.08), p < .001. Two studies reported outcomes on patients undergoing F/B-EVAR; the combined HR for all-cause mortality in sarcopenic versus non-sarcopenic patients was 3.08 (1.66–5.71), p = .004. Radiological sarcopenia defined by psoas or skeletal muscle parameters was associated with inferior survival in patients undergoing both EVAR and F/B-EVAR. Current evidence is limited by heterogeneity in assessment of body composition and lack of a consensus definition of radiological sarcopenia

Authors' reply: Effect of preoperative oral antibiotics in combination with mechanical bowel preparation on inflammatory response and short-term outcomes following left-sided colonic and rectal resections

No abstract available