9 research outputs found

    P4533Duration of heart failure and effect of defibrillator implantation in patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure

    Full text link
    Abstract Introduction Patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure have increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and death from progressive pump failure. Whether the risk of SCD changes over time is unknown. We seek to investigate the relationship between duration of heart failure, mode of death, and effect of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Methods We examined the risk of all-cause death and SCD according to the duration of heart failure among patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure enrolled in the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality (DANISH) trial. Patients were divided according to quartiles of heart failure duration (Q1 ≤8 months, Q2 9 ≤18 months, Q3 19 ≤65 months, Q4 ≥66 months). Results A total number of 1116 patients were included. Patients with the longest duration of heart failure were older, more often men, had more comorbidity, and more often received cardiac resynchronizing therapy device. Doubling of heart failure duration was an independent predictor of both all-cause mortality (HR 1.26 95% CI 1.17–1.37, p&lt;0.0001), and SCD (HR 1.29 95% CI 1.11–1.49, p=0.0009). The proportion of deaths caused by SCD was not different between heart failure quartiles (p=0.91), and the effect of ICD implantation on all-cause mortality was not modified by the duration of heart failure (p=0.59). Duration of heart failure and death Conclusions Duration of heart failure predicted both all-cause mortality and risk of SCD independently of other risk indicators. However, the proportion of death caused by SCD did not change with longer duration of heart failure and the effect of ICD was not modified by the duration of heart failure. Acknowledgement/Funding The work was sponsored by The Danish Heart Foundation (Hjerteforeningen) and the Lundbeck Foundation (Lundbeckfonden). The DANISH trial was supported </jats:sec

    P3096The cardioprotective effect of FFR-significant multivessel disease detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Results from DANAMI3

    Full text link
    Abstract Background In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), reperfusion injury accounts for a significant part of the final infarct size, which is directly related to patient prognosis. In animal studies brief periods of ischemia in non-infarct related coronary arteries protects the myocardium via remote ischemic perconditioning. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measures functional significant coronary stenosis which may offer remote ischemic perconditioning of the myocardium. It has not previously been investigated if FFR-significant stenosis in non-culprit myocardium offers cardioprotection following STEMI. Purpose To investigate cardioprotective effect of FFR-significant multivessel disease (MVD) on final infarct size and myocardial salvage in a large contemporary cohort of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods and results We included 509 patients with STEMI from the DANAMI-3 trial, divided into three groups: 388 (76%) patients had single vessel disease (SVD), 34 (7%) had non-FFR-significant MVD and 192 (17%) had FFR-significant MVD. CMR was performed at baseline and three months after primary PCI. There was no difference in final infarct size; mean infarct size (% left ventricular mass) SVD 9±3%; non-FFR-significant MVD 9±3%; and FFR-significant MVD 9±3%, p=0.95, or in myocardial salvage index (MSI) between groups, calculated as (area-at-risk – infarct size)/area-at-risk; mean index (%) SVD 67±23%; non-FFR-significant MVD 68±19%; and FFR-significant MVD 67±21%, p=0,99. In multivariable regression analyses FFR-significant MVD was not associated med larger MSI (p=0.84) or lower infarct size (p=0.60). Figure 1. A. Late gadolinium (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) image of a mid-ventricular short-axis slice. Hyperintense signals (arrow) shows contrast enhancement in the anterior-septal segments, indicating myocardial infarction (MI). B. Same patient. T2-weighted image of the same mid-ventricular short-axis slice. Hyperintense signals (arrows) shows edema in the anterior-septal segments. Conclusions FFR-significant functional MVD of non-culprit myocardium does not offer cardioprotection in patients following STEMI. </jats:sec

    Poster session V * Saturday 11 December 2010, 08:30-12:30

    Full text link

    Poster session II * Thursday 9 December 2010, 14:00-18:00

    Full text link
    corecore