Diabetische Kardiomyopathie - Tatsache oder Fiktion? Experimentelle Untersuchungen zu Haemodynamik und Stoffwechsel des diabetischen Rattenherzens

SIGLEAvailable from: Giessen Univ. (Germany, F.R.). Universitaetsbibliothek / FIZ - Fachinformationszzentrum Karlsruhe / TIB - Technische InformationsbibliothekDEGerman

Asymmetric dimethylarginine is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease: Results from the multicenter Coronary Artery Risk Determination investigating the Influence of ADMA Concentration (CARDIAC) study

BACKGROUND: Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) plasma levels have been shown to be elevated in diseases related to endothelial dysfunction such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and others. It has been shown that ADMA predicts cardiovascular mortality in patients who have coronary heart disease (CHD). However, the question whether ADMA is an independent risk factor for CHD still remains unresolved. METHODS: The CARDIAC study is a multicenter case-control study, designed to detect differences in ADMA plasma levels between patients with CHD and controls from the general population. We included in our analysis 131 cases and 131 controls, matched for age, sex, and body mass index. RESULTS: We found that cases had higher ADMA plasma levels than controls (0.70 mumol/L [0.59-0.87 mumol/L] vs 0.60 mumol/L [0.54-0.69 mumol/L], P < .001). To evaluate the predictive power of ADMA regarding CHD, we calculated 2 multivariate logistic regression models including laboratory parameters and traditional risk factors. The odds ratio for ADMA in the multivariate model including the laboratory characteristics was 2.59 (1.61-4.17; P < .001); the odds ratio for the multivariate model including other risk factors was 6.04 (2.56-14.25; P < .001) for the third tertile (>0.72 mumol/L) versus the first (<0.58 mumol/L). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude from the results of our study that ADMA is an independent risk factor for CHD

Determinants of subclinical diabetic heart disease

Aims/hypothesis: Subclinical left ventricular (LV) dysfunction has been shown by tissue Doppler and strain imaging in diabetic patients in the absence of coronary disease or LV hypertrophy, but the prevalence and aetiology of this finding remain unclear. This study sought to identify the prevalence and the determinants of subclinical diabetic heart disease. Methods: A group of 219 unselected patients with type 2 diabetes without known cardiac disease underwent resting and stress echocardiography. After exclusion of coronary artery disease or LV hypertrophy, the remaining 120 patients ( age 57 +/- 10 years, 73 male) were studied with tissue Doppler imaging. Peak systolic strain of each wall and systolic (Sm) and diastolic ( Em) velocity of each basal segment were measured from the three apical views and averaged for each patient. Significant subclinical LV dysfunction was identified according to Sm and Em normal ranges adjusted by age and sex. Strain and Em were correlated with clinical, therapeutic, echocardiographic and biochemical variables, and significant independent associations were sought using a multiple linear regressionmodel. Results: Significant subclinical LV dysfunction was present in 27% diabetic patients. Myocardial systolic dysfunction by peak strain was independently associated with glycosylated haemoglobin level ( p< 0.001) and lack of angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitor treatment ( p= 0.003). Myocardial diastolic function ( Em) was independently predicted by age ( p= 0.013), hypertension ( p= 0.001), insulin ( p= 0.008) and metformin ( p= 0.01) treatment. Conclusions/ interpretation: In patients with diabetes mellitus, subclinical LV dysfunction is common and associated with poor diabetic control, advancing age, hypertension and metformin treatment; ACE inhibitor and insulin therapies appear to be protective