21 research outputs found
Russia's geopolitical orientation towards the former Soviet states: was Russia able to discard its imperial legacy?
This thesis analyses Russia's military, economic and diplomatic policies towards the newly
independent states, particularly towards the members of the CIS, during Boris Yeltsin's first
term as President of an independent Russia (December 1991 to July 1996). The objective is to
determine whether after the collapse of the Soviet Union the new Russian state tried to restore
a sphere of influence or informal empire over the former Soviet republics - as the French did
in sub-Saharan Africa after decolonisation - or whether instead Russia's policies reflected a
genuine desire to establish normal state-to-state relations with the new states.
Chapter one analyses the underlying principles of Russia's foreign policy towards the former
Soviet states and examines the debate on Russian foreign policy priorities which took place
during the first years of Russia's independence. This section also overviews Russia's policies
towards the Russian minorities that inhabit the Baltic states, in order to determine whether
Russia attempted to use this diplomatic tool to further its own interests in the area. Chapter
two analyses the peculiar structure of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the
extent to which Russia used this political framework to achieve hegemony over the former
Soviet republics. Chapter three looks at Russia's participation in the wars in Transdniestria,
Abkhazia, Nagorno-Karabagh, and Tajikistan, and Chapter four analyses Russia's energy
trade with Ukraine, Belarus, and the Caspian states.
The thesis reaches the conclusion that during 1992- mid 1996 Russia's policies only partially
reflected an attempt to reassert the country's influence over the republics of the former Soviet
Union and create an informal empire in the post-Soviet space. Russia's behaviour was
particularly assertive in the military field as well as in its attempts to build a Russian dominated
CIS military infrastructure. However, Russia's policies were less aggressive in the
economic sphere, except probably as far as energy policy is concerned, and regarding the fate
of Russians living beyond the new borders. More often than not, though, Russia's policies
followed an ambivalent and incoherent pattern, a result of the weak and fragmented character
of the Russian state