Improving Retail Supply Flexibility using Buyer-Supplier Relational Capabilities

Purpose This study investigates the mediating role of three important relational capabilities - Absorptive Capacity, Transactive Memory Systems, and Organizational Interoperability; on the flexibility of buyer-supplier relationships and performance in retail supply chains. Drawing on the Relational view of strategic management, the impact of relational capabilities on two forms of supply chain flexibility is examined – (a) Configuration Flexibility for switching suppliers with minimal penalties and (b) Planning and Control Flexibility for altering supply schedules, quality, and delivery lead-time. Design/methodology/approach Strategic and tactical level managers from 211 retail stores in the UK were surveyed. We validated a measurement model with structural equation modeling, and tested four hypotheses on the mediating role of relational capabilities on supply chain flexibility and retail performance, controlling for size, duration of relationship and market segment. Findings Results showed that the three relational capabilities partially mediated the positive effect of configuration flexibility and planning and control flexibility on operational performance in big-middle and niche retailers. Examining the interaction effect of the forms of flexibility on the relational capabilities and performance, we found positive interaction effects on Transactive Memory Systems and Organizational Interoperability but a non-significant effect on Absorptive Capacity. Practical Implications In addition to providing novel theoretical insights on supply chain flexibility, our findings have practical implications for supplier selection and buyer-supplier relationship management. Originality/value Overall, the study highlights the impacts of relational capabilities on adopted operational strategies such as flexibility, buyer-supplier relationships, and retail performanc

Regional differences in portion size consumption behaviour: Insights for the global food industry

Abstract: Given the influence of globalization on consumer food behaviour across the world, the purpose of this paper is to contribute to the theoretical discourse around food portion size as a global consumption-related symbol and its underlying socio-economic drivers for food industry strategy. Overall, 25,000 global food consumers were surveyed across 24 countries to elicit insight on portion size consumption behaviour as well as consumer perception on eating and drinking small portion size within selected socio-economic classes. The data was quantitatively analysed to answer the pertinent research objectives. In 20 out of the 24 global markets surveyed, large food portion size was statistically established as a prevalent consumption-related symbol. The paper found that there are regional differences in portion size food consumption behaviour, and further disparities exist across age, gender and income status in 24 countries covering all regions, including Australia, China, Mexico, South Africa, United Kingdom and United States of America. The outlined food industry implications reveal that adaptation and standardisation strategies are still relevant in global food and nutrition strategy as revealed by the variations in the preference for food portion sizes across various countries of the world

Exploring Benefit Transfer: Disamenities of Waste Transfer Stations

The benefit transfer method was developed as an alternative way to value externalities using values from studies of similar circumstances, carried out at similar sites somewhere else, given the challenges and high costs inherent in assessing the actual cost. Specifically, in order to test the performance of the benefit transfer method, employing hedonic price models, this study focused on estimates of disamenities associated with waste transfer stations at four different cities in Israel. The sites were intentionally selected to represent a variety of circumstances. We transferred the estimated benefit function from a “study site” to a “policy site”. The goodness of fit was examined by comparing the calculated value, with actual data from the policy site. To test the sensitivity of the benefit transfer function to socioeconomic and housing characteristics, it was repeatedly applied to different sets of observations. The findings suggest that a relatively large number of alternative benefit functions are transferable. Statistical inequality outcome regarding the degree of similarity between samples does not unequivocally rule out the appropriateness of transferring environmental values across studies. Transfer errors varied between −21% and +29%, and the absolute average error for all transfers was 15.4%. Errors were lower for transfer between relatively similar cities in terms of size and location and between sub-samples that were similar in socioeconomic characteristics and housing type. However, when a site with very dissimilar data was involved, the average absolute error rose to 19%. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007benefit transfer, disamenity, hedonic pricing, valuation, waste management, waste transfer stations,