Y-Chromosomal Diversity in Lebanon Is Structured by Recent Historical Events

Lebanon is an eastern Mediterranean country inhabited by approximately four million people with a wide variety of ethnicities and religions, including Muslim, Christian, and Druze. In the present study, 926 Lebanese men were typed with Y-chromosomal SNP and STR markers, and unusually, male genetic variation within Lebanon was found to be more strongly structured by religious affiliation than by geography. We therefore tested the hypothesis that migrations within historical times could have contributed to this situation. Y-haplogroup J∗(xJ2) was more frequent in the putative Muslim source region (the Arabian Peninsula) than in Lebanon, and it was also more frequent in Lebanese Muslims than in Lebanese non-Muslims. Conversely, haplogroup R1b was more frequent in the putative Christian source region (western Europe) than in Lebanon and was also more frequent in Lebanese Christians than in Lebanese non-Christians. The most common R1b STR-haplotype in Lebanese Christians was otherwise highly specific for western Europe and was unlikely to have reached its current frequency in Lebanese Christians without admixture. We therefore suggest that the Islamic expansion from the Arabian Peninsula beginning in the seventh century CE introduced lineages typical of this area into those who subsequently became Lebanese Muslims, whereas the Crusader activity in the 11th–13th centuries CE introduced western European lineages into Lebanese Christians

Use of a covered self-expanding metal airway stent for severe dynamic collapse within a bronchial aortic graft conduit in a post-lung transplant patient

We present a novel case in which a self-expanding, covered metal airway stent was utilized for severe dynamic collapse within a cadaveric aortic bronchial graft conduit in a post-lung transplant recipient with thoracic situs inversus

Semideterministic global optimization method: Application to a control problem of the Burgers equation

This paper has two objectives. We introduce a new global optimization algorithm reformulating optimization problems in terms of boundary-value problems. Then, we apply this algorithm to a pointwise control problem of the viscous Burgers equation, where the control weight coefficient is progressively decreased. The results are compared with those obtained with a genetic algorithm and an LM-BFGS algorithm in order to check the efficiency of our method and the necessity of using global optimization techniques

The impact of gravity vs suction-driven therapeutic thoracentesis on pressure-related complications: the GRAVITAS multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Thoracentesis can be accomplished by active aspiration or drainage with gravity. We investigated whether gravity drainage could protect against negative-pressure related complications, such as chest discomfort, re-expansion pulmonary edema or pneumothorax, compared to active aspiration. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter single blinded randomized controlled trial allocated patients with large free-flowing effusions estimated ≥ 500 mL 1:1 to active aspiration or gravity drainage. Patients rated chest discomfort on 100 mm visual analog scales before, during, and after drainage. Thoracentesis was halted at complete evacuation or for persistent chest discomfort, intractable cough, or other complication. The primary outcome was overall procedural chest discomfort scored five minutes post-procedure. Secondary outcomes included measures of discomfort and breathlessness through 48 hours post-procedure. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two patients were randomized with 140 in the final analysis. Groups did not differ for the primary outcome (mean VAS score difference 5.3 mm, 95% CI -2.4 to 13.0, p = 0.17). Secondary outcomes of discomfort and dyspnea did not differ between groups. Comparable volumes were drained in both groups but procedure duration was significantly longer in the gravity arm (mean difference 7.4 minutes, 95% CI 10.2 to 4.6, p<0.001). There were no serious complications. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracentesis via active aspiration and gravity drainage both appear safe and result in comparable levels of procedural comfort and dyspnea improvement. Active aspiration requires less total procedural time

The impact of gravity vs suction-driven therapeutic thoracentesis on pressure-related complications: the GRAVITAS multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Thoracentesis can be accomplished by active aspiration or drainage with gravity. We investigated whether gravity drainage could protect against negative-pressure related complications, such as chest discomfort, re-expansion pulmonary edema or pneumothorax, compared to active aspiration. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter single blinded randomized controlled trial allocated patients with large free-flowing effusions estimated ≥ 500 mL 1:1 to active aspiration or gravity drainage. Patients rated chest discomfort on 100 mm visual analog scales before, during, and after drainage. Thoracentesis was halted at complete evacuation or for persistent chest discomfort, intractable cough, or other complication. The primary outcome was overall procedural chest discomfort scored five minutes post-procedure. Secondary outcomes included measures of discomfort and breathlessness through 48 hours post-procedure. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two patients were randomized with 140 in the final analysis. Groups did not differ for the primary outcome (mean VAS score difference 5.3 mm, 95% CI -2.4 to 13.0, p = 0.17). Secondary outcomes of discomfort and dyspnea did not differ between groups. Comparable volumes were drained in both groups but procedure duration was significantly longer in the gravity arm (mean difference 7.4 minutes, 95% CI 10.2 to 4.6, p<0.001). There were no serious complications. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracentesis via active aspiration and gravity drainage both appear safe and result in comparable levels of procedural comfort and dyspnea improvement. Active aspiration requires less total procedural time

Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Prospective External and Temporal Validation of the HAL and HOMER Models

BACKGROUND: Two models, the Help with the Assessment of Adenopathy in Lung cancer (HAL) and Help with Oncologic Mediastinal Evaluation for Radiation (HOMER), were recently developed to estimate the probability of nodal disease in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as determined by endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). The objective of this study was to prospectively externally validate both models at multiple centers. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are the HAL and HOMER models valid across multiple centers? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This multicenter prospective observational cohort study enrolled consecutive patients with PET-CT clinical-radiographic stages T1-3, N0-3, M0 NSCLC undergoing EBUS-TBNA staging. HOMER was used to predict the probability of N0 vs N1 vs N2 or N3 (N2|3) disease, and HAL was used to predict the probability of N2|3 (vs N0 or N1) disease. Model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC), and calibration was assessed using the Brier score, calibration plots, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS: Thirteen centers enrolled 1,799 patients. HAL and HOMER demonstrated good discrimination: HAL ROC-AUC = 0.873 (95%CI, 0.856-0.891) and HOMER ROC-AUC = 0.837 (95%CI, 0.814-0.859) for predicting N1 disease or higher (N1|2|3) and 0.876 (95%CI, 0.855-0.897) for predicting N2|3 disease. Brier scores were 0.117 and 0.349, respectively. Calibration plots demonstrated good calibration for both models. For HAL, the difference between forecast and observed probability of N2|3 disease was +0.012; for HOMER, the difference for N1|2|3 was -0.018 and for N2|3 was +0.002. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was significant for both models (P = .034 and .002), indicating a small but statistically significant calibration error. INTERPRETATION: HAL and HOMER demonstrated good discrimination and calibration in multiple centers. Although calibration error was present, the magnitude of the error is small, such that the models are informative