The efficacy of interdental brushes on plaque and parameters of periodontal inflammation: a systematic review

Aim: The aim of the study was to asses the effect of the use of interdental brushes (IDB) in patients as an adjunct to toothbrushing compared with toothbrushing alone or other interdental oral hygiene devices on plaque and the clinical parameters of periodontal inflammation. Material and methods: MEDLINE-PubMed and the Cochrane Central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL) were searched through November 2007 to identify appropriate studies. Clinical parameters of periodontal inflammation such as plaque, gingivitis, bleeding and pockets were selected as outcome variables. Results: Independent screening of the titles and abstracts of 218 MEDLINE-PubMed and 116 Cochrane papers resulted in nine publications that met the eligibility criteria. Mean values and standard deviations were collected by data extraction. Descriptive comparisons are presented for brushing alone or brushing and woodsticks; meta-analyses were also performed for the floss comparison. Conclusion: As an adjunct to brushing, the IDB removes more dental plaque than brushing alone. Studies showed a positive significant difference using IDB with respect to the plaque scores, bleeding scores and probing pocket depth. The majority of the studies presented a positive significant difference in the plaque index when using the IDB compared with floss

Current Evidence on Prevention of Gingivitis: Oral Hygiene Devices and Dentifrices

Numerous oral hygiene products are currently available on the market, and dental care providers have to select suitable products for the individual patient. Successful oral hygiene should rely on the current best available evidence; hence, oral care providers should be up to date with the advantages and disadvantages of the available oral hygiene products in order to provide their patients with proper information during oral hygiene instruction sessions

Efficacy of inter-dental mechanical plaque control in managing gingivitis - a meta-review

Focused question What is the effect of mechanical inter-dental plaque removal in addition to toothbrushing, on managing gingivitis using various formats of inter-dental self-care in adults based on evidence gathered from existing systematic reviews? Material & Methods Three Internet sources were searched by a strategy designed to include systematic reviews on inter-dental cleaning devices. Plaque and gingivitis scores were the primary parameters of interest. Characteristics of selected papers were extracted. The potential risk of bias was estimated and the acquired evidence was graded. Results Screening of 395 papers resulted in six systematic reviews. Two papers evaluated the efficacy of dental floss, two of inter-dental brushes (IDB), one of woodsticks and one of the oral irrigator. Weak evidence of unclear or small magnitude was retrieved that supported dental floss, woodsticks and the oral irrigator to reduce gingivitis in addition to toothbrushing. No concomitant evidence for an effect on plaque emerged. There is moderate evidence that IDBs in combination with toothbrushing reduce both plaque and gingivitis. Conclusion Evidence suggests that inter-dental cleaning with IDBs is the most effective method for inter-dental plaque removal. The majority of available studies fail to demonstrate that flossing is generally effective in plaque removal. All investigated devices for inter-dental self-care seem to support the management of gingivitis, however, to a varying extend

Socio-behavioural aspects in the prevention and control of dental caries and periodontal diseases at an individual and population level

AIM: Aim was to systematically review behavioural aspects in the prevention and control of dental caries and periodontal diseases at individual and population level. MATERIAL & METHODS: With regard to caries, MEDLINE/PubMed was searched on three subheadings focusing on early childhood, proximal and root caries. For periodontal diseases, a meta-review on systematic reviews was performed; thus, the search strategy included specific interventions to change behaviour in order to perform a meta-review on systematic reviews. After extraction of data and conclusions, the potential risk of bias was estimated and the emerging evidence was graded. RESULTS: Regarding early childhood, proximal and root caries, 28, 6 and 0 papers, respectively, could be included, which predominantly reported on cohort studies. Regarding periodontal diseases, five systematic reviews were included. High evidence of mostly high magnitude was retrieved for behavioural interventions in early childhood caries (ECC), weak evidence for a small effect in proximal caries and an unclear effect of specific informational/motivational programmes on prevention of periodontal diseases and no evidence of root caries. CONCLUSION: Early childhood caries can be successfully prevented by population-based preventive programmes via aiming at the change in behaviour. The effect of individual specific motivational/informational interventions has not yet been clearly demonstrated neither for the prevention of caries nor for periodontal diseases

Dental implants combined with sinus augmentation: What is the merit of bone grafting? A systematic review

Purpose The aim of the present study was to systematically assess the current evidence on the effect of nongrafted compared to graft-assisted maxillary sinus floor elevation on implant survival/failure, endosinus bone gain, crestal bone loss, and bone density around dental implants. Materials and methods MEDLINE-PubMed, Cochrane-CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases were searched up to November 2015 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials-(CCTs), evaluating dental implants placed in combination with maxillary sinus elevation without and with bone grafting. Implant survival/failure served as the primary outcome, whereas endosinus bone gain, crestal bone loss, and bone density around dental implants were secondary outcomes. To assess possible bias, the Cochrane risk of bias tool was used. Data were extracted and a meta-analysis performed where appropriate. Results Independent screening of 3180 papers resulted in six eligible experiments. Heterogeneity was observed among experiments. One experiment showed low, three unclear, and two a high risk of bias. The assessed outcomes showed no significant long-term differences between groups. Conclusion Within the limit of the current systematic review, nongrafted maxillary sinus floor elevation seems to be characterized by new bone formation and high implant survival rate comparable to bone-graft-assisted maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Further long-term studies are needed before definitive conclusions can be made

Contemporary practices for mechanical oral hygiene to prevent periodontal disease

It is well established that dental plaque on teeth leads to gingivitis and periodontitis, and that several mechanical and chemical methods of plaque control can prevent gingivitis. The aim of the current review is to summarize and synthesize the available scientific evidence supporting practices for mechanical oral hygiene to prevent periodontal diseases. Evidence for contemporary practices of mechanical oral hygiene to prevent periodontal disease relies on studies of gingivitis patients. General recommendations concerning the ideal oral hygiene devices and procedures are still inconclusive. However, toothbrushing and interdental cleaning remain the mainstays of prevention of periodontal diseases. The primary approach requires individually tailored instruction for implementation of a systematic oral hygiene regimen