Supporting Families at Risk: Social Workers Experiences of a Family Safeguarding Model and the Effectiveness of Parent Infant Psychotherapy

This thesis reviews and synthesises the evidence-base for parent-infant psychotherapy (PIP) and directly explores social workers experiences working with families in within a Family Safeguarding Model in child protection services. Chapter one is a literature review, critically appraising the effectiveness of parent-infant psychotherapy. PIP was found to be effective in improving parental mental health and mixed results were found for child development and attachment relationship outcomes. Improvements were observed in those with complex trauma histories and in those with poor predicted prognosis (e.g. >4 previous traumas). To improve validity and reliability further research should focus on larger samples including fathers, other comparison groups and robust measurement. Clinical implications such as the importance of trauma-informed assessment and access to intervention are discussed. Chapter two is an empirical paper designed to explore social workers’ experiences of working within the Family Safeguarding Model. Six social workers were recruited and engaged with semi-structured interviews. Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis was used to analysis the transcripts. Three group experiential themes emerged: fighting to work with families, feeling held and protected and we’re breaking at the seams. The results illustrate that when the model works as it’s intended that social workers feel able to connect with families, develop a shared understanding and feel less alone in managing risk. However, with increasing caseloads and a reduction in resources, workers are left feeling alone, powerless and hopeless. Clinical implications for family services are discussed. Chapter three is an executive summary of the empirical paper written for professionals working within family safeguarding services, such as social workers or anyone else involved with this type of work. The aim of this is to make the research outcomes more accessible

A fight to work with families, rather than against them: exploring social workers’ experiences of working within the Family Safeguarding Model; an IPA analysis

The Family Safeguarding Model is a strength-based framework within Child Protection Services in the UK. Given the emotional toll of traditional social work practice that seems to work ‘against’ families, it is important to understand how social workers experience this way of working. To date, there has not been any research exploring social workers’ experiences within this framework. This qualitative study explores social workers’ experiences of working within this model and its implications for relationships with families and professionals. Semi-structured interviews were completed with six social workers. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) was used. Three Group Experiential Themes (GET’s) were identified: fighting to work with families, feeling held and protected and breaking at the seams. The model enabled social workers to develop meaningful relationships with families and consider risk in the context of parents’ early trauma. The MDT offered a ‘secure base’ from which they were able to take positive risks and manage anxiety. However, these experiences were diluted by increased service demands, leaving social workers feeling disempowered. Findings suggest value in consistent in-house multi-agency support, enabling shared responsibility for complex cases. Further research is required on social workers who have worked in other strengthening family frameworks. Keywords: child safeguarding, family safeguarding model, child protectio