Nőgyógyászati daganatok esetén jelentkező szinkrón tumorok együlésben való ellátása három eset kapcsán

A daganatos betegek kivizsgálása során a második tumor előfordulási esélye 15,2%, a harmadik tumoré 1,3%. A közlemény célja felhívni a figyelmet arra, hogy a szinkrón tumorok együlésben történő sebészi ellátása megfelelő szakmai háttérrel a betegek számára kifejezett előnyökkel jár. Az irodalomban nem találhatók protokollok a többes tumorok ellátására, többségében esetismertetések állnak rendelkezésre iránymutatásul. A dolgozatban részletezésre kerül a betegségek preoperatív stádiuma, a kivizsgálási protokoll, a műtét, valamint a szövettani eredmény. A közlemény bemutatja egy hármas tumor – szeméremtest-, rectum-, sigmatumor –, egy nagy kiterjedésű colontumor és endometrium-adenocarcinoma ellátását nyitott műtét során, valamint egy neoadjuváns kezelésen átesett betegnél rectum- és szinkrón endometrium-adenocarcinoma minimálinvazív műtétjét. A bemutatott három eset is bizonyítja, hogy a betegeknek kifejezetten előnyös az együlésben való műtéti megoldás, nem beszélve a költséghatékonyságról. A közleménynek nem témája a műtét utáni vagy adjuváns kezelés megvitatása, ennek eldöntése egyéni elbírálás alapján a kórházak multidiszciplináris szakbizottságainak feladata

Autologous Dermis Graft Implantation: A Novel Approach to Reinforcement in Giant Hiatal Hernias

Objectives. Nonreinforced tensile repair of giant hiatal hernias is susceptible to recurrence, and the role of mesh graft implantation remains controversial. Creating a new and viable choice without the use of high-cost biological allografts is desirable. This study presents the application of dermis graft reinforcement, a cost-efficient, easily adaptable alternative, in graft reinforcement of giant hiatal hernia repairs. Methods. A 62-year-old female patient with recurrent giant hiatal hernia (9 × 11 cm) and upside down stomach, immediately following the Belsey repair done in another department, was selected for the pilot procedure. The standard three-stitch nonabsorbable reconstruction of diaphragmatic crura was undertaken via laparoscopic approach. A 12 × 6 cm dermis autograft was harvested from the loose abdominal skin. “U” figure onlay reinforcement of diaphragm closure was secured with titanium staples. The procedure was completed with a standard Dor fundoplication. One- and seven-month follow-ups were conducted. Results. No short-term postoperative complications were observed. One-month follow-up showed normal anatomical location of abdominal viscera on computed tomography imaging. High-resolution manometry showed normal lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Preoperative abdominal complaints were resolved. Procedural costs were lower than the average cost following mesh graft reinforcement. Conclusion. Dermis graft reinforcement is a cheap, easily adaptable procedure in the repair of giant hiatal hernias, even in the setting of laparoscopic reoperative procedure

Autologous Dermis Graft Implantation: A Novel Approach to Reinforcement in Giant Hiatal Hernias

Objectives. Nonreinforced tensile repair of giant hiatal hernias is susceptible to recurrence, and the role of mesh graft implantation remains controversial. Creating a new and viable choice without the use of high-cost biological allografts is desirable. This study presents the application of dermis graft reinforcement, a cost-efficient, easily adaptable alternative, in graft reinforcement of giant hiatal hernia repairs. Methods. A 62-year-old female patient with recurrent giant hiatal hernia (9 × 11 cm) and upside down stomach, immediately following the Belsey repair done in another department, was selected for the pilot procedure. The standard three-stitch nonabsorbable reconstruction of diaphragmatic crura was undertaken via laparoscopic approach. A 12 × 6 cm dermis autograft was harvested from the loose abdominal skin. “U” figure onlay reinforcement of diaphragm closure was secured with titanium staples. The procedure was completed with a standard Dor fundoplication. One- and seven-month follow-ups were conducted. Results. No short-term postoperative complications were observed. One-month follow-up showed normal anatomical location of abdominal viscera on computed tomography imaging. High-resolution manometry showed normal lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Preoperative abdominal complaints were resolved. Procedural costs were lower than the average cost following mesh graft reinforcement. Conclusion. Dermis graft reinforcement is a cheap, easily adaptable procedure in the repair of giant hiatal hernias, even in the setting of laparoscopic reoperative procedure