Delayed evaluation of combat-related penetrating neck trauma

ObjectiveThe approach to penetrating trauma of the head and neck has undergone significant evolution and offers unique challenges during wartime. Military munitions produce complex injury patterns that challenge conventional diagnosis and management. Mass casualties may not allow for routine exploration of all stable cervical blast injuries. The objective of this study was to review the delayed evaluation of combat-related penetrating neck trauma in patients after evacuation to the United States.MethodFrom February 2003 through April 2005, a series of patients with military-associated penetrating cervical trauma were evacuated to a single institution, prospectively entered into a database, and retrospectively reviewed.ResultsSuspected vascular injury from penetrating neck trauma occurred in 63 patients. Injuries were to zone II in 33%, zone III in 33%, and zone I in 11%. The remaining injuries involved multiple zones, including the lower face or posterior neck. Explosive devices wounded 50 patients (79%), 13 (21%) had high-velocity gunshot wounds, and 19 (30%) had associated intracranial or cervical spine injury. Of the 39 patients (62%) who underwent emergent neck exploration in Iraq or Afghanistan, 21 had 24 injuries requiring ligation (18), vein interposition or primary repair (4), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft interposition (1), or patch angioplasty (1). Injuries occurred to the carotid, vertebral, or innominate arteries, or the jugular vein. After evacuation to the United States, all patients underwent radiologic evaluation of the head and neck vasculature. Computed tomography angiography was performed in 45 patients (71%), including six zone II injuries without prior exploration. Forty (63%) underwent diagnostic arteriography that detected pseudoaneurysms (5) or occlusions (8) of the carotid and vertebral arteries. No occult venous injuries were noted. Delayed evaluation resulted in the detection of 12 additional occult injuries and one graft thrombosis in 11 patients. Management included observation (5), vein or PTFE graft repair (3), coil embolization (2), or ligation (1).ConclusionsPenetrating multiple fragment injury to the head and neck is common during wartime. Computed tomography angiography is useful in the delayed evaluation of stable patients, but retained fragments produce suboptimal imaging in the zone of injury. Arteriography remains the imaging study of choice to evaluate for cervical vascular trauma, and its use should be liberalized for combat injuries. Stable injuries may not require immediate neck exploration; however, the high prevalence of occult injuries discovered in this review underscores the need for a complete re-evaluation upon return to the United States

Measuring the Impact of a Formalized Surgical Patient Signout System

Objective: Routine patient signout within medical teams is an integral component of patient care. Standardized signout systems have shown lowered risks of harm and adverse outcomes to patients, however, many of these systems are difficult to utilize with surgical patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if a standardized surgical signout model would improve resident satisfaction of the signout process and improve resident preparedness for cross-covered services. Design: A 16-question survey was administered to the surgical residents at a single general surgery residency program. A standardized signout using the mnemonic “CUTS” (Core problem, Updates, Things-to-do, Setbacks) was then implemented in the program. Residents retook the survey at 1, 3, and 6-month intervals to compare resident satisfaction on signout before and after the standardized signout implementation. The descriptive statistics of the survey were analyzed for trends over time, trends by resident training year, and for inferential statistics utilizing subscales. Results: The descriptive statistics showed that there was an overall trend towards greater resident satisfaction with signout over time with satisfaction increasing from 41.1% to 80% in the general resident cohort. While there were no statistically significant differences, subscale analysis demonstrated greatest trends for improved satisfaction with the CUTS signout model for the PGY1 and PGY5 classes. There was additionally an increased resident preparedness for overnight events and calls, with a 27% increase in perceived preparedness “75% of the time” and a 5.5% increase in perceived preparedness “Always”. There was no difference in time spent on signout after the implementation of the model. Conclusions: The surgical standardized signout model, CUTS, demonstrated that residents within a single program were more satisfied with signouts, had improved patient understanding and knowledge, and felt increased preparedness for overnight events on cross-covered patients. Further research is needed to determine the impact of the CUTS signout system on patient outcomes.</p

Measuring the Impact of a Formalized Surgical Patient Signout System

Objective: Routine patient signout within medical teams is an integral component of patient care. Standardized signout systems have shown lowered risks of harm and adverse outcomes to patients, however, many of these systems are difficult to utilize with surgical patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if a standardized surgical signout model would improve resident satisfaction of the signout process and improve resident preparedness for cross-covered services. Design: A 16-question survey was administered to the surgical residents at a single general surgery residency program. A standardized signout using the mnemonic “CUTS” (Core problem, Updates, Things-to-do, Setbacks) was then implemented in the program. Residents retook the survey at 1, 3, and 6-month intervals to compare resident satisfaction on signout before and after the standardized signout implementation. The descriptive statistics of the survey were analyzed for trends over time, trends by resident training year, and for inferential statistics utilizing subscales. Results: The descriptive statistics showed that there was an overall trend towards greater resident satisfaction with signout over time with satisfaction increasing from 41.1% to 80% in the general resident cohort. While there were no statistically significant differences, subscale analysis demonstrated greatest trends for improved satisfaction with the CUTS signout model for the PGY1 and PGY5 classes. There was additionally an increased resident preparedness for overnight events and calls, with a 27% increase in perceived preparedness “75% of the time” and a 5.5% increase in perceived preparedness “Always”. There was no difference in time spent on signout after the implementation of the model. Conclusions: The surgical standardized signout model, CUTS, demonstrated that residents within a single program were more satisfied with signouts, had improved patient understanding and knowledge, and felt increased preparedness for overnight events on cross-covered patients. Further research is needed to determine the impact of the CUTS signout system on patient outcomes.</p