Generation of pralatrexate resistant T-cell lymphoma lines reveals two patterns of acquired drug resistance that is overcome with epigenetic modifiers

While pralatrexate (PDX) has been successfully developed for the treatment of T-cell lymphoma, the mechanistic basis for its T-cell selectivity and acquired resistance remains elusive. In an effort to potentially identify synergistic combinations that might circumnavigate or delay acquired PDX resistance, we generated resistant cells lines over a broad concentration range. PDX-resistant cell lines H9-12 and H9-200 were developed, each exhibiting an IC50 of 35 and over 1000 nM, respectively. These lines were established in vitro from parental H9 cells. Expression analysis of the proteins known to be important determinants of antifolate pharmacology revealed increase expression of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) due to gene amplification, and reduced folate carrier1 downregulation, as the putative mechanisms of resistance in H9-12 and H9-200 cells. Cross resistance was only seen with methotrexate but not with romidepsin, azacitidine (AZA), decitabine, gemcitabine, doxorubicin, or bortezomib. Resistance to PDX was reversed by pretreatment with hypomethylating agents in a concentration-dependent fashion. Comparison of gene expression profiles of parental and resistant cell lines confirmed markedly different patterns of gene expression, and identified the dual specificity phosphatase four (DUSP4) as one of the molecular target of PDX activity. Reduced STAT5 phosphorylation following exposure to PDX was observed in the H9 but not in the H9-12 and H9-200 cells. These data suggest that combination with hypomethylating agents could be potent, and that DUSP4 and STAT5 could represent putative biomarkers of PDX activity

The anti-tumor activity of pralatrexate (PDX) correlates with the expression of RFC and DHFR mRNA in preclinical models of multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy. While major advances have been made in the disease, it is still incurable. Although antifolate-based drugs are not commonly used to treat myeloma, new generation analogs with distinct patterns of preclinical and clinical activity may offer an opportunity to identify new classes of potentially active drugs. Pralatrexate (PDX), which was approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma in 2009, may be one such drug. Pralatrexate exhibits a potency and pattern of activity distinct from its predecessors like methotrexate (MTX). We sought to understand the activity and mechanisms of resistance of multiple myeloma to these drugs, which could also offer potential strategies for selective use of the drug. We demonstrate that PDX and MTX both induce a significant decrease in cell viability in the low nanomolar range, with PDX exhibiting a more potent effect. We identified a series of myeloma cell lines exhibiting markedly different patterns of sensitivity to the drugs, with some lines frankly resistant, and others exquisitely sensitive. These differences were largely attributed to the basal RFC (Reduced Folate Carrier) mRNA expression levels. RFC mRNA expression correlated directly with rates of drug uptake, with the most sensitive lines exhibiting the most significant intracellular accumulation of pralatrexate. This mechanism explains the widely varying patterns of sensitivity and resistance to pralatrexate in multiple myeloma cell lines. These findings could have implications for this class of drugs and their role in the treatment of multiple myeloma