5 research outputs found

    Intrauterine Exposure to Biologics in Inflammatory Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review

    Get PDF
    Background: Inflammatory autoimmune diseases are chronic diseases that often affect women of childbearing age. Therefore, detailed knowledge of the safety profile of medications used for management of inflammatory autoimmune diseases during pregnancy is important. However, in many cases the potential harmful effects of medications (especially biologics) during pregnancy (and lactation) on mother and child have not been fully identified. Objective: Our aim was to update the data on the occurrence of miscarriages and (major) congenital malformations when using biologics during pregnancy based on newly published articles. Additionally, we selected several different secondary outcomes that may be of interest for clinicians, especially information on adverse events in the use of a specific biologic during pregnancy. Material and Methods: A search was conducted from 1 January 2015 until 4 July 2019 in Embase.com, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar with specific search terms for each database. Selection of publications was based on title/abstract and followed by full text (double blinded, two researchers). An overview was made based on outcomes of interest. References of the included publications were reviewed to include and minimize the missing publications. Results: A total of 143 publications were included. The total number of cases ranged from nine for canakinumab to 4276 for infliximab. The rates of miscarriages and major congenital malformations did not show relevant differences from those rates in the general population. Conclusion: Despite limitations to our study, no major safety issues were reported and no trend could be identified in the reported malformations

    The pre- and post-authorisation data published by the European medicines agency on the use of biologics during pregnancy and lactation

    Get PDF
    Aims: The effects of biologics on reproduction/lactation are mostly unknown although many patients that receive biologics are women of reproductive age. The first objective of this study was to investigate the publicly available data on pregnancy/lactation before and after marketing authorization in Europe of biologics for the indications of rheumatologic inflammatory autoimmune diseases and inflammatory bowel disease. Secondary objectives included the assessment of the clinical relevance of the provided data and comparison of initial and post-authorization data. Methods: Initial and post-authorization data were extracted from the European Public Assessment Reports and the latest versions of Summary of Product Characteristics using publicly available documents on the European Medicines Agency's website. Four sections were categorized regarding pregnancy outcomes: pre-clinical/animal studies, human female fertility, pregnancy-related outcomes and congenital malformations in the human fetus. Three sections were categorized regarding lactation outcomes: pre-clinical/animal studies, excretion in human breast milk and absorption in children through breastfeeding. The clinical applicability of each category was scored by specified criteria, based on scientific literature, and further as defined by the authors. Results: For the 16 included biologics, post-authorization data were delivered only for adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept and infliximab. For the 12 remaining biologics limited data on pregnancy and lactation during the post-marketing period of 2–21 years were available. Conclusions: In this article several suggestions are provided for improving a multidisciplinary approach to these issues. The initiation of suitable registries by marketing authorization holders and data transparency for clinicians and academics are highly endorsed

    Clopidogrel, a novel antiplatelet agent, and digoxin: Absence of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction

    No full text
    The safety, and the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic compatibility of clopidogrel, 75 mg daily, with the cardiac glycoside digoxin, were assessed in 12 healthy male subjects who took digoxin 0.25 mg once daily for 20 days and, in addition, clopidogrel 75 mg once daily from day 11 to day 20, so as to achieve steady-state conditions with both drugs. The drugs were taken after an overnight fast, and a standardized breakfast was served 30 minutes later. Blood samples for digoxin determination were drawn predose on days 1, 8, 9, 10, 18, 19, and 20 of the schedule, and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postdose on days 10 and 20, Urine samples were collected pre-dose and from 0-4, 4-8, 8-12, and 12-24 hours post-dose on days 10 and 20. Platelet aggregation studies were carried out using ADP at 5 mu mol/L final concentration as an agonist. Establishment of steady-state plasma concentrations of digoxin on days 8-11 and 18-21 was confirmed by application of Dunnett's test on the trough plasma concentrations. The plasma pharmacokinetics and urinary excretions of digoxin for day 10 and day 20 were very similar: the day 20/day 10 ratios (90% CI) were 1.1 (0.99; 1.24) for C-max, 1.0 (0.92; 1.08) for C-min, 1.02 (0.96; 1.07) for AUC(0-24), and 0.99 (0.94; 104) for urinary excretion. Mean inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation at the end of the clopidogrel treatment period was 34%. The clinical, cardiac, and biological evidence from the study indicated that clopidogrel administration does not enhance digoxin's cardiac effects. Overall, the data indicated that there is no reason to anticipate an interaction when clopidogrel is added to digoxin for long-term management of patients with cardiac disease

    Compliance with pregnancy prevention programmes of isotretinoin in Europe: a systematic review

    Get PDF
    P>Most of the publications on isotretinoin, pregnancy and compliance with the pregnancy prevention programme (PPP) originate from North America. Information specific for the European situation is very limited. The aim of this study was to identify publications describing the use of isotretinoin in humans and the compliance with the PPP in Europe, a systematic search in Medline and Embase was conducted using the terms 'isotretinoin, pregnancy (and Europe)'. Furthermore, a manual search in publications was performed. A total of 17 publications were identified. Publications consisted of case reports of exposed pregnancies, surveys among dermatologists or pharmacists and database studies evaluating compliance with the PPP. The studies and surveys dealt with groups of patients exposed to isotretinoin before or during pregnancy and/or compliance with the isotretinoin PPP. Where the information was provided, in 6-26% of cases isotretinoin was prescribed in full accordance with the PPP. Pregnancy incidence was seen in 0 center dot 2-1 center dot 0 per 1000 women of childbearing age using isotretinoin. Between 65% and 87% of these pregnancies were terminated. This review of studies in Europe performed to date shows failures in the implementation of the PPP. Therefore, the isotretinoin PPP must be scrutinized to identify whether new measures should be taken or whether the failures in the implementation need to be corrected. New measures should take into account the definition of the ultimate goal of a PPP and the acceptable burden. In the meantime, stakeholders could make a start with adjustments in the implementation of the PPP by taking responsibility and enhancing the performance by explicit instructions, monitoring the performance and adjusting, if necessary
    corecore