Angiosperm Phylogeny: 17 Genes, 640 Taxa

• Premise of the study : Recent analyses employing up to fi ve genes have provided numerous insights into angiosperm phylogeny, but many relationships have remained unresolved or poorly supported. In the hope of improving our understanding of angiosperm phylogeny, we expanded sampling of taxa and genes beyond previous analyses. • Methods : We conducted two primary analyses based on 640 species representing 330 families. The fi rst included 25 260 aligned base pairs (bp) from 17 genes (representing all three plant genomes, i.e., nucleus, plastid, and mitochondrion). The second included 19 846 aligned bp from 13 genes (representing only the nucleus and plastid). • Key results : Many important questions of deep-level relationships in the nonmonocot angiosperms have now been resolved with strong support. Amborellaceae, Nymphaeales, and Austrobaileyales are successive sisters to the remaining angiosperms ( Mesangiospermae ), which are resolved into Chloranthales + Magnoliidae as sister to Monocotyledoneae + [Ceratophyllaceae + Eudicotyledoneae ]. Eudicotyledoneae contains a basal grade subtending Gunneridae . Within Gunneridae , Gunnerales are sister to the remainder ( Pentapetalae ), which comprises (1) Superrosidae , consisting of Rosidae (including Vitaceae) and Saxifragales; and (2) Superasteridae , comprising Berberidopsidales, Santalales, Caryophyllales , Asteridae , and, based on this study, Dilleniaceae (although other recent analyses disagree with this placement). Within the major subclades of Pentapetalae , most deep-level relationships are resolved with strong support. • Conclusions : Our analyses confi rm that with large amounts of sequence data, most deep-level relationships within the angiosperms can be resolved. We anticipate that this well-resolved angiosperm tree will be of broad utility for many areas of biology, including physiology, ecology, paleobiology, and genomics

Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/1/ajb20704-sup-0010.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/2/ajb20704.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/3/ajb20704-sup-0001.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/4/ajb20704-sup-0016.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/5/ajb20704-sup-0017.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/6/ajb20704-sup-0021.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/7/ajb20704-sup-0003.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/8/ajb20704-sup-0002.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/9/ajb20704-sup-0011.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/10/ajb20704-sup-0019.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/11/ajb20704-sup-0015.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/12/ajb20704-sup-0006.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/13/ajb20704-sup-0020.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/14/ajb20704-sup-0013.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/15/ajb20704-sup-0004.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/16/ajb20704-sup-0012.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/17/ajb20704-sup-0005.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/18/ajb20704-sup-0018.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/19/ajb20704-sup-0009.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/20/ajb20704-sup-0014.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/21/ajb20704-sup-0007.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/22/ajb20704-sup-0008.pd

Phylogeny of the Caryophyllales Sensu Lato: Revisiting Hypotheses on Pollination Biology and Perianth Differentiation in the Core Caryophyllales

Molecular phylogenetics has revolutionized our understanding of the Caryophyllales, and yet many relationships have remained uncertain, particularly at deeper levels. We have performed parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses on separate and combined data sets comprising nine plastid genes (∼12,000 bp), two nuclear genes (∼5000 bp), and the plastid inverted repeat (∼24,000 bp), giving a combined analyzed length of 42,006 bp for 36 species of Caryophyllales and four outgroups. We have recovered strong support for deep-level relationships across the order. Two major subclades are well supported, the noncore and core Caryophyllales; Rhabdodendron followed by Simmondsia are sisters to the core Caryophyllales, Limeum and Stegnosperma are successive sisters to the "globular inclusion" clade, Gisekia is a distinct lineage well separated from Rivina within the "raphide" clade, and Rivina and Phytolaccaceae are disparate lineages, with Rivina sister to Nyctaginaceae. The placement of Sarcobatus and relationships within the portulacaceous cohort remain problematic. Within the latter, Halophytum is sister to Basellaceae and Didiereaceae, and the clade comprising Portulaca, Talinum, and Cactaceae is well supported. Classical hypotheses argued that the early Caryophyllales had evolved in open, dry, marginal environments at a time when pollinators were scarce, and, as such, the ancestral caryophyllid flower was wind pollinated with an undifferentiated perianth. We reevaluated these hypotheses in light of our phylogeny and find little support for anemophily as the ancestral condition; however, the early caryophyllid flower is suggested to have possessed an undifferentiated perianth. A subsequent minimum of nine origins of differentiated perianth is inferred. We discuss the evidence for independent origins of differentiated perianth and highlight the research opportunities that this pattern offers to the field of evolutionary developmental genetics