1,147 research outputs found

    Ferric Gluconate Yields Cost-Savings in Hemodialysis Patients with High Ferritin and Low TSAT: Results from the DRIVE Studies

    Get PDF
    Purpose: One third of hemodialysis patients have high serum ferritin levels and low transferrin saturation (TSAT). The purpose of this analysis was to determine the cost effectiveness of administering 1g of sodium ferric gluconate complex (SFGC: also referred to as ferric gluconate) to patients with serum ferritin \u3e500ng/mL and TSAT ≤25% based on the Dialysis Patients Response to IV Iron with Elevated Ferritin (DRIVE) study and its 6-week observational extension (DRIVE-II). In these studies, IV iron administration resulted in reduced epoetin requirements. Methods: Decision analysis was performed using a time horizon of 12 weeks, consistent with the combined duration of DRIVE and DRIVE II. Treatment effectiveness was based on mean increase in hemoglobin (Hb) for each group (SFGC plus epoetin or epoetin alone) in the intention to treat populations. Costs included drugs (SFGC and epoetin) and hospitalizations due to serious adverse events (SAEs) reported. The primary cost effectiveness measure was cost per g/dL of Hb increase at 12 weeks. Costs were computed from a Medicare perspective using projected 2007 reimbursements. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the impact of using the safety population, median epoetin and SFGC doses, actual 2005 Medicare reimbursements, median increases in Hb, and SAE rate changes. The model was constructed using TreeAge Pro software. Results: Total cost per patient receiving SFGC plus epoetin was 3675perg/dLHbincrease,whilethetotalcostperpatientreceivingepoetinalonewas3675 per g/dL Hb increase, while the total cost per patient receiving epoetin alone was 5065 per g/dL Hb increase. Net savings for SFGC plus epoetin was $1390 per g/dL Hb increase over the 12 week period Sensitivity analyses affirmed the robustness of the model. Conclusion: Administering 1g of SFGC plus epoetin in patients with high ferritin and low TSAT as defined in the DRIVE studies resulted in significant cost-savings compared to epoetin alone

    Diagnostic Utility of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised in Two Samples of Survivors of War

    Get PDF
    The study aimed at examining the diagnostic utility of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) as a screening tool for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in survivors of war. The IES-R was completed by two independent samples that had survived the war in the Balkans: a sample of randomly selected people who had stayed in the area of former conflict (n = 3,313) and a sample of refugees to Western European countries (n = 854). PTSD was diagnosed using the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Prevalence of PTSD was 20.1% in the Balkan sample and 33.1% in the refugee sample. Results revealed that when considering a minimum value of specificity of 0.80, the optimally sensitive cut-off score for screening for PTSD in the Balkan sample was 34. In both the Balkan sample and the refugee sample, this cut-off score provided good values on sensitivity (0.86 and 0.89, respectively) and overall efficiency (0.81 and 0.79, respectively). Further, the kappa coefficients for sensitivity for the cut-off of 34 were 0.80 in both samples. Findings of this study support the clinical utility of the IES-R as a screening tool for PTSD in large-scale research studies and intervention studies if structured diagnostic interviews are regarded as too labor-intensive and too costly

    Getting the most out of remote care: Co‐developing a Toolkit to improve the delivery of remote kidney care appointments for underserved groups

    Get PDF
    Background Telephone and video appointments are still common post-pandemic, with an estimated 25%–50% of kidney appointments in the United Kingdom still conducted remotely. This is important as remote consultations may exacerbate pre-existing inequalities in those from underserved groups. Those from underserved groups are often not represented in health research and include those with learning disability, mental health needs, hearing/sight problems, young/older people, those from ethnic minority groups. Objectives The aim was to develop a Toolkit to improve the quality of remote kidney care appointments for people from different underserved groups. Design A parallel mixed methods approach with semi-structured interviews/focus groups and survey. We also conducted workshops to develop and validate the Toolkit. Participants Seventy-five renal staff members completed the survey and 21 patients participated in the interviews and focus groups. Patients (n = 11) and staff (n = 10) took part in the Toolkit development workshop, and patients (n = 13) took part in the Toolkit validation workshop. Results Four themes from interviews/focus groups suggested areas in which remote appointments could be improved. Themes were quality of appointment, patient empowerment, patient–practitioner relationship and unique needs for underserved groups. Staff reported difficulty building rapport, confidentiality issues, confidence about diagnosis/advice given, technical difficulties and shared decision making. Conclusion This study is the first to explore experiences of remote appointments among both staff and those from underserved groups living with kidney disease in the United Kingdom. While remote appointments can be beneficial, our findings indicate that remote consultations need optimisation to meet the needs of patients. The project findings informed the development of a Toolkit which will be widely promoted and accessible in the United Kingdom during 2024
    corecore