Il recepimento italiano della Direttiva 2004/80/CE. Brevi note di carattere pratico relative all’indennizzo delle vittime di reato

La Direttiva 2004/80/CE stabilisce che gli Stati membri dell’Unione Europea mettano in atto sistemi normativi volti a prevedere forme di indennizzo a favore delle vittime di reati violenti e dolosi, quando l’autore del fatto criminale sia sconosciuto o insolvente. Il presente articolo pone l’attenzione sul recepimento nell’ordinamento italiano della norma europea, operato con la Legge n. 122 del 6 luglio 2016,evidenziando gli aspetti critici e le problematiche sollevati dalla dottrina e dalla giurisprudenza. Appare, infatti, concorde la dottrina nel ritenere che tale norma rappresenta una lettura riduzionistica della disciplina europea. I punti critici della legge italiana sono sintetizzabili in particolare: nella generale restrizione del concetto di indennizzo (inteso prevalentemente come rimborso spese), nella limitazione dei reati per i quali è prevista la possibilità di ottenere un ristoro e nelle condizioni previste in capo alla vittima per accedere al beneficio. La Directive n°2004/80/CE prévoit que les États membres mettent en vigueur les dispositions législatives, réglementaires et administratives nécessaires pour indemniser les victimes de délits violents et intentionnels lorsque le contrevenant ne peut pas être identifié ou est insolvable. Cet article porte sur l’intégration de cette Directive dans le système légal italien, par la Loi n°122 du 6 juillet 2016, mettant en relief les aspects les plus critiques et les problèmes envisagés par la littérature et la jurisprudence. La littérature sur le sujet semble, en effet, indiquer que cette loi est réductionniste en comparaison avec la Directive européenne. Les points critiques de la loi italienne peuvent être résumés comme suit : la restriction du concept d’indemnisation (dans la loi italienne il ne couvre que les dépenses) ; le nombre restreint de délits pour lesquels l’indemnisation est prévue ; les caractéristiques de la victime nécessaires à l’obtention de l’indemnisation. The Directive no. 2004/80/CE stipulates that Member States shall bring into force the laws about compensation to violent and intentional crime victims where the offender cannot be identified or is insolvent. This article focuses on the incorporation of this Directive into the Italian legal system, through the law no. 122 of 6 July 2016, highlighting the most critical aspects and the problems unveiled by literature and justice case-law. The literature seems to agree that such a law is reductionist in comparison with the European regulation. The critical points of the Italian law may be summarised as follows: the restriction of the concept of compensation (in the Italian law it is intended as a mere cover expenditure); the few number of crimes for which a compensation can be envisaged; the underlying conditions of the victims for asking for the compensation

Il recepimento italiano della Direttiva 2004/80/CE. Brevi note di carattere pratico relative all’indennizzo delle vittime di reato/L’intégration de la Directive n°2004/80/CE dans le système légal italien. Brefs aperçus sur l’indemnisations des victimes de délits/The incorporation of Directive no. 2004/80/CE into the Italian legal system. Brief outline about compensation to crime victims

La Direttiva 2004/80/CE stabilisce che gli Stati membri dell’Unione Europea mettano in atto sistemi normativi volti a prevedere forme di indennizzo a favore delle vittime di reati violenti e dolosi, quando l’autore del fatto criminale sia sconosciuto o insolvente. Il presente articolo pone l’attenzione sul recepimento nell’ordinamento italiano della norma europea, operato con la Legge n. 122 del 6 luglio 2016,evidenziando gli aspetti critici e le problematiche sollevati dalla dottrina e dalla giurisprudenza. Appare, infatti, concorde la dottrina nel ritenere che tale norma rappresenta una lettura riduzionistica della disciplina europea. I punti critici della legge italiana sono sintetizzabili in particolare: nella generale restrizione del concetto di indennizzo (inteso prevalentemente come rimborso spese), nella limitazione dei reati per i quali è prevista la possibilità di ottenere un ristoro e nelle condizioni previste in capo alla vittima per accedere al beneficio. La Directive n°2004/80/CE prévoit que les États membres mettent en vigueur les dispositions législatives, réglementaires et administratives nécessaires pour indemniser les victimes de délits violents et intentionnels lorsque le contrevenant ne peut pas être identifié ou est insolvable. Cet article porte sur l’intégration de cette Directive dans le système légal italien, par la Loi n°122 du 6 juillet 2016, mettant en relief les aspects les plus critiques et les problèmes envisagés par la littérature et la jurisprudence. La littérature sur le sujet semble, en effet, indiquer que cette loi est réductionniste en comparaison avec la Directive européenne. Les points critiques de la loi italienne peuvent être résumés comme suit : la restriction du concept d’indemnisation (dans la loi italienne il ne couvre que les dépenses) ; le nombre restreint de délits pour lesquels l’indemnisation est prévue ; les caractéristiques de la victime nécessaires à l’obtention de l’indemnisation. The Directive no. 2004/80/CE stipulates that Member States shall bring into force the laws about compensation to violent and intentional crime victims where the offender cannot be identified or is insolvent. This article focuses on the incorporation of this Directive into the Italian legal system, through the law no. 122 of 6 July 2016, highlighting the most critical aspects and the problems unveiled by literature and justice case-law. The literature seems to agree that such a law is reductionist in comparison with the European regulation. The critical points of the Italian law may be summarised as follows: the restriction of the concept of compensation (in the Italian law it is intended as a mere cover expenditure); the few number of crimes for which a compensation can be envisaged; the underlying conditions of the victims for asking for the compensation

EU online child safety: what does the literature say?

The purpose of this review is to introduce both the research and political context of the European Commission?s ISEC Illegal Use of the Internet work programme and the EU Online Child Safety investigation. This includes examining the social, psychological and legal contexts of online crimes perpetrated against children, inclusive of a holistic engagement with the relevant policy, legislation and law enforcement procedures within the European Union. The primary aim of this study is to explore the prevalence of online childhood sexual abuse (online CSA) including the production, distribution and collection of childhood indecent images, online grooming and elements of ?sexting? from the perspective of law enforcement and industry. The study covers four European countries and their associated practices: UK, Netherlands, Italy and Ireland, all of which will provide a comparative perspective of cross-cultural procedures and processes in law enforcement, industry practice and victimisation. This paper will address a summary of the key findings from the scoping phase covering all elements of the criminal justice process. Specifically, key summaries and themes emerging from the literature consulted are presented and recommendations are made for progress and as indicators for the project as it develops

The Synergistic Impacts of Anthropogenic Stressors and COVID-19 on Aquaculture: A Current Global Perspective

The rapid, global spread of COVID-19, and the measures intended to limit or slow its propagation, are having major impacts on diverse sectors of society. Notably, these impacts are occurring in the context of other anthropogenic-driven threats including global climate change. Both anthropogenic stressors and the COVID-19 pandemic represent significant economic challenges to aquaculture systems across the globe, threatening the supply chain of one of the most important sources of animal protein, with potential disproportionate impacts on vulnerable communities. A web survey was conducted in 47 countries in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic to assess how aquaculture activities have been affected by the pandemic, and to explore how these impacts compare to those from climate change. A positive correlation between the effects of the two categories of drivers was detected, but analysis suggests that the pandemic and the anthropogenic stressors affect different parts of the supply chain. The immediate measurable reported losses varied with aquaculture typology (land vs. marine, and intensive vs. extensive). A comparably lower impact on farmers reporting the use of integrated multitrophic aquaculture (IMTA) methods suggests that IMTA might enhance resilience to multiple stressors by providing different market options under the COVID-19 pandemic. Results emphasize the importance of assessing detrimental effects of COVID-19 under a multiple stressor lens, focusing on areas that have already locally experienced economic loss due to anthropogenic stressors in the last decade. Holistic policies that simultaneously address other ongoing anthropogenic stressors, rather than focusing solely on the acute impacts of COVID-19, are needed to maximize the long-term resilience of the aquaculture sector.publishedVersio

Parental presence in Italian pediatric intensive care units: a reappraisal of current visiting policies

Parental presence in Italian pediatric intensive care units: a reappraisal of current visiting policie

The aquaculture supply chain in the time of covid-19 pandemic: Vulnerability, resilience, solutions and priorities at the global scale

The COVID-19 global pandemic has had severe, unpredictable and synchronous impacts on all levels of perishable food supply chains (PFSC), across multiple sectors and spatial scales. Aquaculture plays a vital and rapidly expanding role in food security, in some cases overtaking wild caught fisheries in the production of high-quality animal protein in this PFSC. We performed a rapid global assessment to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and related emerging control measures on the aquaculture supply chain. Socio-economic effects of the pandemic were analysed by surveying the perceptions of stakeholders, who were asked to describe potential supply-side disruption, vulnerabilities and resilience patterns along the production pipeline with four main supply chain components: a) hatchery, b) production/processing, c) distribution/logistics and d) market. We also assessed different farming strategies, comparing land- vs. sea-based systems; extensive vs. intensive methods; and with and without integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, IMTA. In addition to evaluating levels and sources of economic distress, interviewees were asked to identify mitigation solutions adopted at local / internal (i.e., farm-site) scales, and to express their preference on national / external scale mitigation measures among a set of a priori options. Survey responses identified the potential causes of disruption, ripple effects, sources of food insecurity, and socio-economic conflicts. They also pointed to various levels of mitigation strategies. The collated evidence represents a first baseline useful to address future disaster-driven responses, to reinforce the resilience of the sector and to facilitate the design reconstruction plans and mitigation measures, such as financial aid strategies

The Synergistic Impacts of Anthropogenic Stressors and COVID-19 on Aquaculture: A Current Global Perspective

The rapid, global spread of COVID-19, and the measures intended to limit or slow its propagation, are having major impacts on diverse sectors of society. Notably, these impacts are occurring in the context of other anthropogenic-driven threats including global climate change. Both anthropogenic stressors and the COVID-19 pandemic represent significant economic challenges to aquaculture systems across the globe, threatening the supply chain of one of the most important sources of animal protein, with potential disproportionate impacts on vulnerable communities. A web survey was conducted in 47 countries in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic to assess how aquaculture activities have been affected by the pandemic, and to explore how these impacts compare to those from climate change. A positive correlation between the effects of the two categories of drivers was detected, but analysis suggests that the pandemic and the anthropogenic stressors affect different parts of the supply chain. The immediate measurable reported losses varied with aquaculture typology (land vs. marine, and intensive vs. extensive). A comparably lower impact on farmers reporting the use of integrated multitrophic aquaculture (IMTA) methods suggests that IMTA might enhance resilience to multiple stressors by providing different market options under the COVID-19 pandemic. Results emphasize the importance of assessing detrimental effects of COVID-19 under a multiple stressor lens, focusing on areas that have already locally experienced economic loss due to anthropogenic stressors in the last decade. Holistic policies that simultaneously address other ongoing anthropogenic stressors, rather than focusing solely on the acute impacts of COVID-19, are needed to maximize the long-term resilience of the aquaculture sector