Centerscope

Centerscope, formerly Scope, was published by the Boston University Medical Center "to communicate the concern of the Medical Center for the development and maintenance of improved health care in contemporary society.

The effect of amfonelic acid or nisoxetine in combination with morphine on brain-stimulation reward

Many drugs of abuse, including stimulants such as cocaine and amphetamine, and opioids like morphine and heroin, will lower the threshold at which rats will work to receive electrical stimulation to the medial forebrain bundle-lateral hypothalamic region (MFB-LH). This effect is even greater when the two classes of drugs are coadministered. The underlying mechanisms by which this occurs are not completely understood, however there is considerable evidence suggesting that the catecholamines play a major role in mediating the reinforcing effects of these drugs. The present study was conducted to investigate the effects of amfonelic acid, an indirect dopamine agonist, and nisoxetine, a highly selective norepinephrine uptake blocker, alone and in combination with morphine, on the reward threshold for rewarding electrical intracranial stimulation. As in previous studies, morphine, as well as amfonelic acid, lowered the reward threshold with the amfonelic acid causing greater threshold lowerings than that of morphine. When a low (ineffective) dose of amfonelic acid was administered concomitantly with morphine, the threshold lowerings observed were larger than those seen with either drug alone and were often more than additive. Nisoxetine alone had no effect on the reward threshold and produced inconsistent results when combined with morphine. These findings support the thesis that amfonelic acid has abuse potential, and that its reinforcing effects may, in fact, be even greater than that of the opioids. Further, these results support the hypothesis that dopamine plays a more critical role in mediating brain-stimulation reward than dose norepinephrine

Potentiation of morphine analgesia by d-amphetamine is mediated by norepinephrine and not dopamine

Morphine will raise the threshold for escape from aversive electrical stimulation delivered to the mesencephalic reticular formation and this effect is potentiated by d-amphetamine. In order to study the roles which dopamine and norepinephrine play in modulating opiate analgesia, the effects of amfonelic acid, an indirect dopamine agonist, and nisoxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake blocker, were determined alone and in combination with morphine using this supraspinal model of analgesia. Amfonelic acid alone produced hyperalgesia and completely antagonized the analgesic effect of morphine. Nisoxetine had no effect by itself, however, it potentiated the analgesic effect of morphine when the two drugs were administered concomitantly. These findings suggest that norepinephrine and not dopamine plays a predominant role in the potentiation of opiate analgesia by d-amphetamine

Withdrawal from chronic, intermittent access to a highly palatable food induces depressive-like behavior in compulsive eating rats.

The increased availability of highly palatable foods is a major contributing factor toward the development of compulsive eating in obesity and eating disorders. It has been proposed that compulsive eating may develop as a form of self-medication to alleviate the negative emotional state associated with withdrawal from highly palatable foods. This study was aimed at determining whether withdrawal from chronic, intermittent access to a highly palatable food was responsible for the emergence of depressive-like behavior. For this purpose, a group of male Wistar rats was provided a regular chow diet 7 days a week (Chow/Chow), whereas a second group of rats was provided chow for 5 days a week, followed by a 2-day access to a highly palatable sucrose diet (Chow/Palatable). Following 7 weeks of diet alternation, depressive-like behavior was assessed during withdrawal from the highly palatable diet and following renewed access to it, using the forced swim test, the sucrose consumption test, and the intracranial self-stimulation threshold procedure. It was found that Chow/Palatable rats withdrawn from the highly palatable diet showed increased immobility time in the forced swim test and decreased sucrose intake in the sucrose consumption test compared with the control Chow/Chow rats. Interestingly, the increased immobility in the forced swim test was abolished by renewing access to the highly palatable diet. No changes were observed in the intracranial self-stimulation threshold procedure. These results validate the hypothesis that withdrawal from highly palatable food is responsible for the emergence of depressive-like behavior, and they also show that compulsive eating relieves the withdrawal-induced negative emotional state