The role of positron-emission tomography in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis

Abstract Background: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an inflammatory disease of the larger vessels, typically affecting the temporal arteries, but involvement of the carotid and thoracic arteries is not uncommon. Serious complications such as blindness can occur if the disease is left untreated. Currently, the gold standard test for GCA is a temporal biopsy, but this invasive technique is not without risks and frequently inaccurate. We investigate the use of 18-fluoro-desoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) as a new diagnostic means in GCA. Methods: We performed a literature search in the MEDLINE database for original research articles written in the English language that discussed the use of PET in diagnosing GCA. After applying selection criteria, 9 articles were included for literature review and 4 of these were incorporated in a meta-analysis. Results: 18-FDG uptake in the extracranial arteries is correlated to the presence GCA within patients suspected for vasculitis. In our meta-analysis we found the following results: sensitivity 85% (95% CI; 74-92%, I2=0.0%), specificity 91% (95% CI; 82-96%, I2=31.2%), positive likelihood ratio 7.18 (95% CI; 3.43-15.06, I2 =10.1%) and negative likelihood ratio 0.19 (95% CI; 0.11-0.33, I2= 0.0%). Discussion: 18F-FDG-PET cannot replace temporal artery biopsy at the present time, because of its limited ability to visualise the cranial arteries. However, PET may be provide valuable information when extracranial involvement is suspected, specifically in biopsy-negative patients who are strongly suspected of having GCA

Endovascular Treatment The Role of Dominant Caliber M2 Segment Occlusion in Ischemic Stroke

Background and Purpose—It is unclear whether endovascular treatment (EVT) is beneficial for patient

Follow-up infarct volume as a mediator of endovascular treatment effect on functional outcome in ischaemic stroke

Objective: The putative mechanism for the favourable effect of endovascular treatment (EVT) on functional outcome after acute ischaemic stroke is preventing follow-up infarct volume (FIV) progression. We aimed to assess to what extent difference in FIV explains the effect of EVT on functional outcome in a randomised trial of EVT versus no EVT (MR CLEAN). Methods: FIV was assessed on non-contrast CT scan 5–7 days after stroke. Functional outcome was the score on the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months. We tested the causal pathway from intervention, via FIV to functional outcome with a mediation model, using linear and ordinal regression, adjusted for relevant baseline covariates, including stroke severity. Explained effect was assessed by taking the ratio of the log odds ratios of treatment with and without adjustment for FIV. Results: Of the 500 patients included in MR CLEAN, 60 died and four patients underwent hemicraniectomy before FIV was assessed, leaving 436 patients for analysis. Patients in the intervention group had better functional outcomes (adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) 2.30 (95% CI 1.62–3.26) than controls and smaller FIV (median 53 vs. 81 ml) (difference 28 ml; 95% CI 13–41). Smaller FIV was associated with better outcome (acOR per 10 ml 0.60, 95% CI 0.52–0.68). After adjustment for FIV the effect of intervention on functional outcome decreased but remained substantial (acOR 2.05, 95% CI 1.44–2.91). This implies that preventing FIV progression explains 14% (95% CI 0–34) of the beneficial effect of EVT on outcome. Conclusion: The effect of EVT on FIV explains only part of the treatment effect on functional outcome. Key Points: • Endovascular treatment in acute ischaemic stroke patients prevents progression of follow-up infarct volume on non-contrast CT at 5–7 days.• Follow-up infarct volume was related to functional outcome, but only explained a modest part of the effect of intervention on functional outcome.• A large proportion of treatment effect on functional outcome remains unexplained, suggesting FIV alone cannot be used as an early surrogate imaging marker of functional outcome

Acute Endovascular Treatment of Patients With lschemic Stroke From Intracranial Large Vessel Occlusion and Extracranial Carotid Dissection

Introduction: Carotid artery dissection (CAD) and atherosclerotic carotid artery occlusion (ACAO) are major causes of a tandem occlusion in patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO). Presence of tandem occlusions may hamper intracranial access and potentially increases the risk of procedural complications of endovascular treatment (EVT). Our aim was to assess neurological, functional and technical outcome and complications of EVT for intracranial LVO in patients with CAD in comparison to patients with ACAO and to patients without CAD or ACAO. Methods: We analyzed data of the MR CLEAN trial intervention arm and MR CLEAN Registry, acquired in 16 Dutch EVT-centers. Primary outcome was the change in stroke severity by comparing the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at 24–48 h after treatment vs. baseline. Secondary outcomes included reperfusion rate and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). We compared outcomes and complications between patients with CAD vs. patients with ACAO and patients without CAD or ACAO. Results: In total, we identified 74 (4.7%) patients with CAD, 92 (5.9%) patients with ACAO and 1398 (89.4%) patients without CAD or ACAO. Neurological improvement at short-term after EVT in patients with CAD was significantly better compared to ACAO (resp. mean −5 vs. mean −1 NIHSS point; p = 0.03) and did not differ compared to patients without CAD or ACAO (−4 NIHSS points; p = 0.62). Rates of successful reperfusion in patients with CAD (47%) was comparable to patients with ACAO (47%; p = 1.00), but was less often achieved compared to patients without CAD or ACAO (58%; p = 0.08). Occurrence of sICH did not differ significantly between CAD patients (5%) and ACAO (11%; p = 0.33) or without CAD/ACAO (6%; p = 1.00). Conclusion: EVT in patients with intracranial LVO due to CAD results in neurological improvement comparable to patients without tandem occlusions. Therefore, carotid artery dissection by itself should not be a contraindicati