Improving Water Quality in Four Austin Area Streams

This Working paper provides brief information on a project to improve the water quality of four Austin creeks, including Waller Creek, by reducing the amount of bacteria in the water. The aim of this project is to protect contact recreation in the creeks.Waller Creek Working Grou

Scope of Practice for Rehabilitation Counseling

[Excerpt] The Scope of Practice Statement identifies knowledge and skills required for the provision of effective rehabilitation counseling services to persons with physical, mental, developmental, cognitive, and emotional disabilities as embodied in the standards of the profession\u27s credentialing organizations

Assessment Summary

This document provides context for the 2006 Texas Water Quality Inventory Waller Creek data sheetWaller Creek Working Grou

Executive Summary

This document provides context for the 2006 Texas Water Quality Inventory Waller Creek data sheetWaller Creek Working Grou

University of Alaska Southeast Juneau, Sitka, and Ketchikan, Alaska, Year One Review Report, Fall, 2011

A Confidential Peer-Evaluation Report Prepared for the Northwest Commission of Colleges and UniversitiesEvaluation Committee -- Introduction -- Eligibility Requirements -- Standard 1.A Mission -- Standard 1.B Core Themes -- Commendations and Recommendations -- Addendum - Response to Recommendation

Toward a social compact for digital privacy and security

Executive summary The Global Commission on Internet Governance (GCIG) was established in January 2014 to articulate and advance a strategic vision for the future of Internet governance. In recent deliberations, the Commission discussed the potential for a damaging erosion of trust in the absence of a broad social agreement on norms for digital privacy and security. The Commission considers that, for the Internet to remain a global engine of social and economic progress that reflects the world’s cultural diversity, confidence must be restored in the Internet because trust is eroding. The Internet should be open, freely available to all, secure and safe. The Commission thus agrees that all stakeholders must collaborate together to adopt norms for responsible behaviour on the Internet. On the occasion of the April 2015 Global Conference on Cyberspace meeting in The Hague, the Commission calls on the global community to build a new social compact between citizens and their elected representatives, the judiciary, law enforcement and intelligence agencies, business, civil society and the Internet technical community, with the goal of restoring trust and enhancing confidence in the Internet. It is now essential that governments, collaborating with all other stakeholders, take steps to build confidence that the right to privacy of all people is respected on the Internet. It is essential at the same time to ensure the rule of law is upheld. The two goals are not exclusive; indeed, they are mutually reinforcing. Individuals and businesses must be protected both from the misuse of the Internet by terrorists, cyber criminal groups and the overreach of governments and businesses that collect and use private data. A social compact must be built on a shared commitment by all stakeholders in developed and less developed countries to take concrete action in their own jurisdictions to build trust and confidence in the Internet. A commitment to the concept of collaborative security and to privacy must replace lengthy and over-politicized negotiations and conferences

Raising Our Sights: The Need for Ethics Training in Government

Reporthttps://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/feerick_integrity_commission_reports/1014/thumbnail.jp

Raising Our Sights: The Need for Ethics Training in Government

Reporthttps://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/feerick_integrity_commission_reports/1014/thumbnail.jp

Crime Shouldn\u27t Pay: A Pension Forfeiture Statute for New York

Reporthttps://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/feerick_integrity_commission_reports/1004/thumbnail.jp

Rereading the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: plurality and contestation, not consensus

In this paper I examine the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. My analysis counters conventional narratives of consensus and imposition that characterize the development of the UN human rights regime. The central argument is that within the founding text of the contemporary human rights movement there is an ambiguous account of rights, which exceeds easy categorization of international rights as universal moral principles or merely an ideological imposition by liberal powers. Acknowledging this ambiguous history, I argue, opens the way to an understanding of human rights as an ongoing politics, a contestation over the terms of legitimate political authority and the meaning of “humanity” as a political identity