33 research outputs found

    Regulation of the Activity of the Dual-Function DnaA Protein in Caulobacter crescentus

    Get PDF
    DnaA is a conserved essential bacterial protein that acts as the initiator of chromosomal replication as well as a master transcriptional regulator in Caulobacter crescentus. Thus, the intracellular levels of active DnaA need to be tightly regulated during the cell cycle. Our previous work suggested that DnaA may be regulated at the level of its activity by the replisome-associated protein HdaA. Here, we describe the construction of a mutant DnaA protein [DnaA(R357A)]. The R357 residue in the AAA+ domain of the C. crescentus DnaA protein is equivalent to the R334 residue of the E. coli DnaA protein, which is required for the Regulatory Inactivation of DnaA (RIDA). We found that the expression of the DnaA(R357A) mutant protein in C. crescentus, but not the expression of the wild-type DnaA protein at similar levels, causes a severe phenotype of over-initiation of chromosomal replication and that it blocks cell division. Thus, the mutant DnaA(R357A) protein is hyper-active to promote the initiation of DNA replication, compared to the wild-type DnaA protein. DnaA(R357A) could not replace DnaA in vivo, indicating that the switch in DnaA activity once chromosomal replication has started may be an essential process in C. crescentus. We propose that the inactivation of DnaA is the main mechanism ensuring that chromosomal replication starts only once per cell cycle. We further observed that the R357A substitution in DnaA does not promote the activity of DnaA as a direct transcriptional activator of four important genes, encoding HdaA, the GcrA master cell cycle regulator, the FtsZ cell division protein and the MipZ spatial regulator of cell division. Thus, the AAA+ domain of DnaA may play a role in temporally regulating the bifunctionality of DnaA by reallocating DnaA molecules from initiating DNA replication to transcribing genes within the unique DnaA regulon of C. crescentus

    The functions of DNA methylation by CcrM in Caulobacter crescentus: a global approach

    Get PDF
    DNA methylation is involved in a diversity of processes in bacteria, including maintenance of genome integrity and regulation of gene expression. Here, using Caulobacter crescentus as a model, we exploit genome-wide experimental methods to uncover the functions of CcrM, a DNA methyltransferase conserved in most Alphaproteobacteria. Using single molecule sequencing, we provide evidence that most CcrM target motifs (GANTC) switch from a fully methylated to a hemi-methylated state when they are replicated, and back to a fully methylated state at the onset of cell division. We show that DNA methylation by CcrM is not required for the control of the initiation of chromosome replication or for DNA mismatch repair. By contrast, our transcriptome analysis shows that >10% of the genes are misexpressed in cells lacking or constitutively over-expressing CcrM. Strikingly, GANTC methylation is needed for the efficient transcription of dozens of genes that are essential for cell cycle progression, in particular for DNA metabolism and cell division. Many of them are controlled by promoters methylated by CcrM and co-regulated by other global cell cycle regulators, demonstrating an extensive cross talk between DNA methylation and the complex regulatory network that controls the cell cycle of C. crescentus and, presumably, of many other Alphaproteobacteri

    Mechanism of Lethal Toxin Neutralization by a Human Monoclonal Antibody Specific for the PA20 Region of Bacillus anthracis Protective Antigen

    Get PDF
    The primary immunogenic component of the currently approved anthrax vaccine is the protective antigen (PA) unit of the binary toxin system. PA-specific antibodies neutralize anthrax toxins and protect against infection. Recent research has determined that in humans, only antibodies specific for particular determinants are capable of effecting toxin neutralization, and that the neutralizing epitopes recognized by these antibodies are distributed throughout the PA monomer. The mechanisms by which the majority of these epitopes effect neutralization remain unknown. In this report we investigate the process by which a human monoclonal antibody specific for the amino-terminal domain of PA neutralizes lethal toxin in an in vitro assay of cytotoxicity, and find that it neutralizes LT by blocking the requisite cleavage of the amino-terminal 20 kD portion of the molecule (PA20) from the remainder of the PA monomer. We also demonstrate that the epitope recognized by this human monoclonal does not encompass the 166RKKR169 furin recognition sequence in domain 1 of PA

    Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome

    Get PDF
    The sequence of the human genome encodes the genetic instructions for human physiology, as well as rich information about human evolution. In 2001, the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium reported a draft sequence of the euchromatic portion of the human genome. Since then, the international collaboration has worked to convert this draft into a genome sequence with high accuracy and nearly complete coverage. Here, we report the result of this finishing process. The current genome sequence (Build 35) contains 2.85 billion nucleotides interrupted by only 341 gaps. It covers ∌99% of the euchromatic genome and is accurate to an error rate of ∌1 event per 100,000 bases. Many of the remaining euchromatic gaps are associated with segmental duplications and will require focused work with new methods. The near-complete sequence, the first for a vertebrate, greatly improves the precision of biological analyses of the human genome including studies of gene number, birth and death. Notably, the human enome seems to encode only 20,000-25,000 protein-coding genes. The genome sequence reported here should serve as a firm foundation for biomedical research in the decades ahead

    Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

    Get PDF
    IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022). INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes. RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570

    DĂ©blocage de ribosomes et Ă©tiquetages de polypeptides par trans-traduction chez Escherichia coli

    Full text link
    L ARNtm et SmpB permettent la libĂ©ration des ribosomes lorsque la traduction est dĂ©fectueuse. Les polypeptides dont la biosynthĂšse est bloquĂ©e sont en mĂȘme temps Ă©tiquetĂ©s, ce qui induit leur Ă©limination par des protĂ©ases. Ce mĂ©canisme est nommĂ© trans-traduction. SmpB et l ARNtm sont ubiquitaires chez les eubactĂ©ries. Nous montrons que les SmpB de plusieurs espĂšces bactĂ©riennes peuvent Ă©tiqueter des polypeptides avec l ARNtm d E. coli in vivo, ce qui illustre la conservation fonctionnelle du systĂšme de trans-traduction. Nous montrons aussi que la trans-traduction n est pas affectĂ©e in vivo Ă  des concentrations sublĂ©tales aminoglycosides nĂ©omycine B ou paromomycine. Elle amĂ©liore mĂȘme la survie d E. coli en prĂ©sence de ces antibiotiques et d Ă©rythromycine, probablement en limitant l accumulation de polypeptides anormaux et la sĂ©questration des ribosomes.Par ailleurs, le gĂšne codant pour l ARNtm a Ă©tĂ© gĂ©nĂ©tiquement modifiĂ© pour identifier des polypeptides prĂ©fĂ©rentiellement Ă©tiquetĂ©s in vivo chez E. coli. Nous montrons que des protĂ©ines complĂštes peuvent ĂȘtre Ă©tiquetĂ©es par l ARNtm, si la terminaison de la traduction de leur messager est dĂ©fectueuse. Enfin, nous montrons que le messager secM est trans-traduit, car il est clivĂ© Ă  un site de blocage traductionnel prĂ©cĂ©demment caractĂ©risĂ©. Nous proposons qu il existe une activitĂ© endoribonuclĂ©asique encore inconnue, qui serait associĂ©e au ribosome et activĂ©e en rĂ©ponse Ă  un blocage traductionnel. Elle agirait en concertation avec la trans-traduction. Elle pourrait intervenir dans certaines voies de rĂ©gulation cellulaire ou limiter certains Ă©vĂšnements de recodage.tmRNA and SmpB can rescue ribosomes stalled on a messenger during translation. Nascent polypeptides are tagged, which induces their degradation by proteases. This mechanism is called trans-translation. First, we show that SmpB from multiple bacterial species can tag polypeptides in vivo, together with E. coli tmRNA. This result illustrates the remarquable functionnal conservation of the trans-translation mechanism. Second, we show that trans-translation is not affected in vivo by sublethal concentrations of the aminoglycosides neomycin B and paromomycin. Moreover, trans-translation conferes a growth advantage in the presence of these antibiotics and erythromycin, probably by limiting accumulation of abnormal polypeptides and stalled ribosomes. Third, the gene encoding tmRNA was genetically modified, in order to identify polypeptides that are preferentially tagged in vivo by trans-translation in E. coli. We show that complete proteins can also be tagged by tmRNA, if translation termination of their messengers is poorly efficient. Finally, we show that secM messenger is trans-translated, because it is cleaved at a site of ribosome pausing during translation elongation. We propose that their is an endonucleolytic activity associated with the ribosome, which is induced in response to ribosome stalling. In cooperation with trans-translation, it could participate in some regulation pathways or could limit some recoding events during translation.ORSAY-PARIS 11-BU Sciences (914712101) / SudocSudocFranceF

    Feedback Control of DnaA-Mediated Replication Initiation by Replisome-Associated HdaA Protein in Caulobacter▿

    Full text link
    Chromosome replication in Caulobacter crescentus is tightly regulated to ensure that initiation occurs at the right time and only once during the cell cycle. The timing of replication initiation is controlled by both CtrA and DnaA. CtrA binds to and silences the origin. Upon the clearance of CtrA from the cell, the DnaA protein accumulates and allows loading of the replisome at the origin. Here, we identify an additional layer of replication initiation control that is mediated by the HdaA protein. In Escherichia coli, the Hda protein inactivates DnaA after replication initiation. We show that the Caulobacter HdaA homologue is necessary to restrict the initiation of DNA replication to only once per cell cycle and that it dynamically colocalizes with the replisome throughout the cell cycle. Moreover, the transcription of hdaA is directly activated by DnaA, providing a robust feedback regulatory mechanism that adjusts the levels of HdaA to inactivate DnaA
    corecore