Fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of chronic pouchitis:A systematic review

The objective was to evaluate available literature on treatment of chronic pouchitis with fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) focusing on clinical outcomes, safety, and different approaches to FMT preparation and delivery. A systematic review of electronic databases was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Library from inception through April 2020. Human studies of all study types reporting results of FMT to treat chronic pouchitis were included. Nine studies, reporting FMT treatment of 69 patients with chronic pouchitis were found eligible for the review. Most studies were case series and cohort studies rated as having fair to poor quality due to high risk of bias and small sample size. Only one randomized controlled trial was included, finding no beneficial effect of FMT. In total clinical response after FMT was reported in 14 (31.8%) out of 44 evaluated patients at various timepoints after FMT, and clinical remission in ten (22.7%) patients. Only minor self-limiting adverse events were reported. FMT varied greatly regarding preparation, length of treatment, and route of delivery. The effects of FMT on symptoms of chronic pouchitis are not established, though some studies show promising results. Future controlled well-designed studies are warranted

Long-Term Safety Following Faecal Microbiota Transplantation as a Treatment for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection Compared with Patients Treated with a Fixed Bacterial Mixture: Results from a Retrospective Cohort Study

Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the recommended treatment for recurrent C. difficile infection (rCDI) following a second recurrence. FMT is considered safe in the short term when procedures for the screening of donors and transferred material are followed. However, the long-term safety profile of FMT treatment is largely unknown. In a retrospective cohort study, we assessed the long-term safety of patients treated for rCDI with FMT or a fixed bacterial mixture, rectal bacteriotherapy (RBT). The overall survival, risk of hospital admission, onset of certain pre-specified diseases (cancer, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and inflammatory bowel disease) and risk of being diagnosed with a multidrug-resistant organism were assessed by undertaking a review of the treated patients’ medical records for up to five years following treatment. A total of 280 patients were treated for rCDI with FMT (n = 145) or RBT (n = 135) between 2016 and 2020. In the five years following treatment, there were no differences in survival (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.03; 95% CI 0.68–1.56), p = 0.89), risk of hospital admission ((aHR 0.92; 95% CI 0.72–1.18), p = 0.5) or onset of any of the analysed diseases. In conclusion, FMT was not associated with increased mortality, risk of hospital admission or onset of disease following treatment when compared with RBT

Systematic review with meta-analysis:encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation - evidence for clinical efficacy

Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken of studies using encapsulated FMT up to 26 October 2020. Data on indication, clinical outcomes, safety, treatment protocol and capsule preparation were collected and reported. Pooled rates of clinical efficacy in rCDI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of single variables on clinical efficacy was evaluated using univariate meta-regression. Results: A total of 35 studies reporting the treatment of 960 patients with encapsulated FMT for eight different indications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies ( n  = 18, 51%) and patients ( n  = 755, 79%) were from studies on rCDI. Cure rates after single and multiple courses of treatments with encapsulated FMT in rCDI were 85% (95% CI: 82%-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 88%-96%) respectively. The treatment outcome was not significantly affected by dose, number of delivered capsules, anaerobic/aerobic processing, single/multi-donor treatment, lyophilisation, or any other single factor in the production or delivery of encapsulated FMT. Promising but non-comparable results from the treatment of ulcerative colitis and multidrug-resistant organisms were reported. Conclusions: Encapsulated FMT is an effective and safe treatment of rCDI, with cure rates comparable to FMT delivered through other routes. The treatment is effective despite variations in donor screening, preparation and treatment protocol. For other indications, the role of FMT capsules is still not sufficiently examined, although some studies show promising results. Plain Language Summary Transfer of faecal material through capsules in the treatment of various diseases. Evidence for clinical efficacy The bacteria and other microorganisms of the gut is different in patient with various diseases in comparison with healthy subjects. Therefore, ways to change the microorganisms of the gut in a beneficial direction has been the subject of various research projects within recent years. Faecal microbiota transplantation often referred as FMT is a method of transferring microorganisms from healthy donors to patients with various diseases and is seen as one way to change the microbial community of the gut in a beneficial direction. Faecal microbiota transplantation can be performed in different ways such as through endoscopy, enemas or capsules. The transfer through capsules is preferred by the patients and has advantages since it can be administered long-term and can be delivered to the patients in their home. In this paper, we evaluated all accessible research reporting treatment with encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of various diseases. We report the following major findings: -Treatment with capsules is safe when guidelines for screening donors and testing faecal material is followed. -The treatment is highly effective in the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection, a disease with high mortality often caused by repeated antibiotic treatments. The treatment was effective in 596 of 723 patients following one course of capsule treatment. -Faecal microbiota transplantation delivered through capsules is as effective as treatment delivered through other routes in the treatment of C. difficile infection. -The treatment is effective in the treatment of C. difficile infection across studies and countries, despite great differences in the ways the capsules were prepared and delivered. -Increasing the amount of faecal material used in the production did not affect the efficacy of the treatment. -There are promising results in the treatment of other diseases such as liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease and the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacteria

Long-Term Safety Following Faecal Microbiota Transplantation as a Treatment for Recurrent<i> Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection Compared with Patients Treated with a Fixed Bacterial Mixture:Results from a Retrospective Cohort Study

Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the recommended treatment for recurrent C. difficile infection (rCDI) following a second recurrence. FMT is considered safe in the short term when procedures for the screening of donors and transferred material are followed. However, the long-term safety profile of FMT treatment is largely unknown. In a retrospective cohort study, we assessed the long-term safety of patients treated for rCDI with FMT or a fixed bacterial mixture, rectal bacteriotherapy (RBT). The overall survival, risk of hospital admission, onset of certain pre-specified diseases (cancer, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and inflammatory bowel disease) and risk of being diagnosed with a multidrug-resistant organism were assessed by undertaking a review of the treated patients’ medical records for up to five years following treatment. A total of 280 patients were treated for rCDI with FMT (n = 145) or RBT (n = 135) between 2016 and 2020. In the five years following treatment, there were no differences in survival (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.03; 95% CI 0.68–1.56), p = 0.89), risk of hospital admission ((aHR 0.92; 95% CI 0.72–1.18), p = 0.5) or onset of any of the analysed diseases. In conclusion, FMT was not associated with increased mortality, risk of hospital admission or onset of disease following treatment when compared with RBT

The Efficacy of Faecal Microbiota Transplant and Rectal Bacteriotherapy in Patients with Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The most effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT); however, the optimal route of administration is thus far unknown. This retrospective cohort study of 343 patients sought to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with FMT capsules, FMT enema, and rectal bacteriotherapy (RBT) during a five-year period. The primary endpoint was clinical resolution from CDI after eight weeks, and secondary endpoints were time to recurrence and death during the follow-up period. The proportion of patients with clinical resolution was 79.9% in the FMT capsule group, 53.3% in the FMT enema group, and 61.8% in the RBT group, corresponding to an adjusted odds ratio of 3.79 (CI: 1.82 to 8.26) in the FMT capsule group compared with FMT enema, and 2.92 (CI: 1.49 to 6.03) compared with RBT. The hazards ratio for recurrence within the first 12 months of follow-up was 0.24 (CI: 0.06 to 0.89) in the FMT capsule group compared with FMT enema, and 0.26 (CI: 0.08 to 0.91) compared with RBT. There was no difference in mortality. In conclusion, FMT capsules were more effective than both FMT enema and RBT as treatment of recurrent CDI and reduced the risk of further recurrences